http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Any-quick-and-comprehensive-reference-for-the-widget-xmls-tp143745p143749.html
No, not expecting a more detailed answer. Umbrella answers like "you can go ahead to publish any
engineer's manual" is fine by me. :)
But seriously, if you have any objections, please do let me know before I dash my face bloody
David E. Jones wrote:
>
> On Jan 26, 2007, at 2:16 AM, Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
>
>> David (Jones),
>>
>> I just came across
>>
http://www.undersunconsulting.com/ecommerce/control/category/~category_id=OFBDOCREF
>> .
>>
>> I didn't realize those references are there. Do you have an electronic
>> version of those references we can help ourselves to?
>
> No.
>
>> If not, would I get in trouble for reverse-engineering the Widget XML
>> engine and publishing an "engineer's manual" of sorts?
>
> No.
>
> If you were expected more detailed answers please let me know which and
> I'd be happy to elaborate.
>
> -David
>
>
>> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
>>> David,
>>> I had wanted to let this slide, seeing how there's no response for
>>> past 5 days. Would've been a simple answer like "go here for
>>> references".
>>> Not that I need this anymore, but for the newcomers at large, I
>>> thought I'd ask this again.
>>> Perhaps I REALLY missed a spot on the internet and didn't see the
>>> references you wrote and published. If so, please do let me know.
>>> I'm ok with Andrew Sykes' comment about a foible: we ask a question,
>>> only to figure out the answer ourselves just when the community
>>> responds to question.
>>> But at least let me be the LAST victim of such unfortunate
>>> circumstance? Let the next newbie like me not have to ask this same
>>> question?
>>> Jonathon
>>> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
>>>> Or do I have to go through the widget Java sources to learn all
>>>> about them?
>>>>
>>>> Jonathon
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>