Re: Any quick and comprehensive reference for the widget xmls?

Posted by cjhowe on
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Any-quick-and-comprehensive-reference-for-the-widget-xmls-tp143745p143750.html

http://www.opensourcestrategies.com/ofbiz/tutorials.php

read the section of "Cookbooks"


--- Jonathon -- Improov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> David,
>
> No, not expecting a more detailed answer. Umbrella answers like "you
> can go ahead to publish any
> engineer's manual" is fine by me. :)
>
> But seriously, if you have any objections, please do let me know
> before I dash my face bloody
> against unseen barriers (legal or otherwise).
>
> Jonathon
>
> David E. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 26, 2007, at 2:16 AM, Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
> >
> >> David (Jones),
> >>
> >> I just came across
> >>
>

http://www.undersunconsulting.com/ecommerce/control/category/~category_id=OFBDOCREF

>
> >> .
> >>
> >> I didn't realize those references are there. Do you have an
> electronic
> >> version of those references we can help ourselves to?
> >
> > No.
> >
> >> If not, would I get in trouble for reverse-engineering the Widget
> XML
> >> engine and publishing an "engineer's manual" of sorts?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > If you were expected more detailed answers please let me know which
> and
> > I'd be happy to elaborate.
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> >> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
> >>> David,
> >>> I had wanted to let this slide, seeing how there's no response
> for
> >>> past 5 days. Would've been a simple answer like "go here for
> >>> references".
> >>> Not that I need this anymore, but for the newcomers at large, I
> >>> thought I'd ask this again.
> >>> Perhaps I REALLY missed a spot on the internet and didn't see the
>
> >>> references you wrote and published. If so, please do let me know.
> >>> I'm ok with Andrew Sykes' comment about a foible: we ask a
> question,
> >>> only to figure out the answer ourselves just when the community
> >>> responds to question.
> >>> But at least let me be the LAST victim of such unfortunate
> >>> circumstance? Let the next newbie like me not have to ask this
> same
> >>> question?
> >>> Jonathon
> >>> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
> >>>> Or do I have to go through the widget Java sources to learn all
> >>>> about them?
> >>>>
> >>>> Jonathon
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>
>