Re: svn propchange: r920213 - svn:log

Posted by Adam Heath-2 on Mar 08, 2010; 2:33pm
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Re-svn-propchange-r920213-svn-log-tp1584254p1584556.html

Tim Ruppert wrote:
> You have seen the email from Jacopo telling you why this can and should be revered.  If you'd like me to resend that again, I can do it - but this commit has been turned down by many other committers - not just me, Hans.  I have also modeled the appropriate behavior here on the Service Providers Page - that's the right place to point to your home page or your twitter feed - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/jwBk - or really I would say it could just be on your own marketing material, but I was trying to compromise here.
>
> Please don't get into a commit war - we've discussed this one to death and it was time to revert it.  This isn't about legal at this point - we have a place for this kind of thing and you having a twitter feed is not news - especially when the link is completely obfuscated to make it seem like it's a project resource.
>
> Again, as I've said in this commit message and on this list like a thousand times - once the PMC decides we need a twitter feed AND all committers are provided with the credentials AND we update the Bio and information to show that this is not a certain companies, but being done by all of us, then I for one and in favor of putting this back the original way you envisioned.  This has been echoed as something that many other PMC members and committers want to have happen - is this something that you are not in favor of any longer (that is following thru on the process of getting buy in)?
>
> OFBiz having an official sanctioned Twitter feed IS news - can't wait until we get to that point - if that's what gets decided.

We don't need a twitter feed.  We already have a 'notification' system
 of things that change/happen in ofbiz.

It's called this list.