Re: too much problems with new functions was: Re: ofbiz twitter account was: Re: svn commit: r918926 - in /ofbiz/site: images/follow_us-b.png index.html

Posted by Adam Heath-2 on Mar 11, 2010; 4:57pm
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r918926-in-ofbiz-site-images-follow-us-b-png-index-html-tp1578166p1589289.html

Tim Ruppert wrote:
> +1 - and thanks for laying it out Ean. I guess the only question remains is what stops us from moving in this direction if we can achieve exactly what Ean's talking about?  This sounds like something that would allow all of us the ability to manage the pieces we want to without polluting the code base with internal initiatives.
>
> Alas, I do feel like this might be a huge departure for many - but this seems like it might fix many of the contentious issues that waste a ton of time around here.

It's unfortunate, but even tho Ean and I have be evangelizing ofbiz, I
can't recommend at the time it's use for managing ofbiz code.

Right now, ofbiz has a single source for any changes.  svn on apache.
 If suddenly we start going the distributed route, then were will
official changes come from?  Who will step up to be responsible for
pulling code from everyone else?  I don't think there is anyone in
this community who is willing to spend this huge amount of time, just
being a code aggregator.  It's an expensive position.