http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/OFBiz-GWT-Projects-for-bulding-user-interface-with-GWT-tp1570621p1589564.html
I would happy to wait an extra few minutes of compile to save a few hours of
> From: "Wickersheimer Jeremy" <
[hidden email]>
>
> Yes we only compile for one browser and one locale.
>>
>> Also there are various modules and only the modified modules are rebuilt
>> although when working on the common module this still triggers the
>> rebuilding of all the depending modules.
>>
>> This is obviously slower than modifying the js code in-line in your page
>> of course, but a typical rebuild cycle in development is just a few minutes.
>>
>
> Great, but mmm... few minutes is much...
>
> Jacques
>
>
> --
>> Wickersheimer Jeremy
>> On Friday 12 March 2010 00:06:22 chris snow wrote:
>>
>>> >From the GWT FAQ
>>>
>>>
>>>
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/1.6/FAQ_DebuggingAndCompiling.html#Ca>>> n_I_speed_up_the_GWT_compiler ?:
>>>
>>> If you are compiling a large application, you may find that compiling to
>>> web mode takes a long time. One issue is that the compiler actually
>>> builds
>>> several versions of your application based on client properties for
>>> locale
>>> and browser. For deployment, this is crucial, but for everyday
>>> development, you are probably only using a single browser and locale. If
>>> that is the case, then you can take a shortcut and compile only a single
>>> permutation during the development cycle.
>>>
>>> I don't know if OpenTaps are doing this development optimisation.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Tim Ruppert
>>>
>>> <
[hidden email]>wrote:
>>> > The compilation steps, the model of usage, the weight it put on the
>>> > system, etc, etc - in fact I can only say that I don't think it's very
>>> > usage for anyone - although it does have some pretty slick tools. We
>>> > use prototype and the tools around - but we've got people who throw
>>> that
>>> > stuff around pretty easily. I would prefer not to be forced into going
>>> > the GWT route - so what I was saying, is let's keep it out of regular
>>> > usage for as long as possible.
>>> > > Cheers,
>>> > Ruppert
>>> > --
>>> > Tim Ruppert
>>> > HotWax Media
>>> >
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com>>> > > o:801.649.6594
>>> > f:801.649.6595
>>> > > On Mar 10, 2010, at 4:13 PM, chris snow wrote:
>>> > > Hi Tim,
>>> > > > > Just out of interest, which bits suck with GWT - developing, or
>>> end
>>> > > user usability?
>>> > > > > One reason that got me interested in using GWT with ofbiz is the
>>> amount
>>> > > of
>>> > > > time that it took to add some interactivity to some of my ftl pages
>>> > > using prototype. (I have some previous experience with jQuery, but
>>> > > not with prototype, so learning curve was a moderately big part of my
>>> > > pain).
>>> > > > > Cheers,
>>> > > > > Chris
>>> > > --
>>> > > > View this message in context:
>>> >
>>>
http://n4.nabble.com/OFBiz-GWT-Projects-for-bulding-user-interface-with-G>>> > WT-tp1570621p1588195.html
>>> > > > Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>
>>
>