http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/AW-Re-OFBiz-Dev-Question-on-i18n-of-Entity-labels-tp165701p165703.html
Sorry, maybe I misunderstand you. What exactly do you mean with core data?
> Thanks Tapio for you suggestion. I was thinking about core data, and I don't
> think that it's user job to do that, don't you ?
>
> Although I agree that it will be less pain to delegate localization tasks to
> other people than developper. Only localization skill is involved with a
> solution like yours, no more is needed ! But before that we need to develop
> something, egg and hen problem...
>
> Let's see what others think about it, and if my intuition is worth
> something.
>
> Jacques
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tapio Reisinger" <
[hidden email]>
> To: <
[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 4:51 PM
> Subject: AW: Re: [OFBiz] Dev - Question on i18n of Entity labels
>
>
>
>>Jacques,
>>
>>I agree with you. For me it would be much better to maintain descriptions
>
> by the user in the screen and not by the developer in the property files.
>
>>My suggestion is to create for each entity which needs localized data, a
>
> text entity extension. Thist text entity consists the key from the entity,
> which needs the localized data, the language key (DE or FR) and the
> description.
>
>>Regards
>>Tapio
>>
>>
>>>Thanks Peter for this explanation, I must admit that I was not clear. I
>
> was
>
>>>asking myself if it will not be easier to maintain localized data at a
>
> root
>
>>>level in the futur. I was not thinking about demo datas but core datas. I
>>>have no solution to propose, it was just an inner question (intuitive),
>
> with
>
>>>a little argument for others thought... I feel that there is something
>
> there
>
>>>but I can't argue more for the moment, perhaps I'm wrong ;o)
>>>
>>>Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Peter Goron"
>>>To: "OFBiz Project Development Discussion"
>>>Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 3:07 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Dev - Question on i18n of Entity labels
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi David,
>>>>
>>>>I will complete Jacques message about i18n of entity data in neogia
>>>>project.
>>>>
>>>>In order to localized demo data, we have extended entity engine to
>
> allow
>
>>>>loading of localized data files instead of original ones.
>>>>
>>>>Example :
>>>>java -jar ofbiz.jar -install -locale=fr_FR
>>>>
>>>>When Entity data loader will load DemoProduct.xml :
>>>>First it will try to load DemoProduct_fr_FR.xml if present,
>>>>else it will try to load DemoProduct_fr.xml if present,
>>>>else it will fallback to DemoProduct.xml
>>>>
>>>>This extension is not intended to replace existing solutions to
>>>>localized entity data because this solution is not applicable to a
>>>>multi-locale site.
>>>>
>>>>Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Jacques, cvs and branches are not related to i18n stuff. It's a better
>>>>way to track ofbiz evolution instead of keeping a lot of synchronized
>>>>patches.
>>>>
>>>>Le mardi 19 juillet 2005 à 07:09 -0500, David E. Jones a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>>Hmmm... You lost me. What is it that you are proposing?
>>>>>
>>>>>-David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Jul 19, 2005, at 1:33 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Some days before, I asked this question on Jira. Without any
>>>>>>comment, I ask
>>>>>>it one more time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>After have done this job (Jira OFBIZ-356), I asked myself if it was
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>right way to manage i18n of Entity. I think we should manage i18n
>>>>>>and l10n
>>>>>>of this data at root. Entity datas in DB came initially from xml
>>>>>>data files
>>>>>>which are in data directory of each component. I think we shoud
>>>>>>create a new
>>>>>>(even replacement) mechanism (or even an architecture) that takes
>>>>>>account of
>>>>>>this fact.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>For example, people of Néréides (France) have already taken this
>
> into
>
>>>>>>account and have created branchs in CVS for Neogia to manage it in
>>>>>>their own
>>>>>>global ant job which merges their components with OFBiz components
>>>>>>(OFBiz
>>>>>>components remain most part of Neogia actually).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What do you think about that ? Any idea, objection ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Dev mailing list
>>>>
[hidden email]
>>>><a
>>
>>href="
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev">
http://lists.ofbiz.org/m>
> ailm
>
>>>an/listinfo/dev</a>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Dev mailing list
>>>
[hidden email]
>>><a
>>
>>href="
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev">
http://lists.ofbiz.org/m>
> ailm
>
>>>an/listinfo/dev</a>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Dev mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>>
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev>