Re: [OFBiz] Dev - Why Work Order?

Posted by David E. Jones on
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/OFBiz-Dev-Why-Work-Order-tp166129p166131.html


This is now out, as of rev 5946.

-David


On Oct 11, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Si Chen wrote:

> I've always wondered about that one.  Sure, let's get rid of it.
> David E. Jones wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Why do we have a work order? I think it was put in originally due  
>> to  a misunderstanding, but I see some newer artifacts that use  
>> the  OrderType of Work Order.
>>
>> What does this mean? It seems like from the code that it is just  
>> a  sales order, but I don't think it makes any sense to have a  
>> work  order separate from a sales order, and it is more flexible  
>> in general  to just have sales orders and we can always use the  
>> Work Order Item  OrderItemType.
>>
>> Does anyone have any issues with just removing the Work Order  
>> OrderType? I think it would be less confusing...
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>

 
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev