Posted by
Scott Gray on
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Dev-keep-postgresql-jdbc-driver-in-ofbiz-tp166639p166650.html
Why not just include the jars and add a readme disclaimer stating that
included jars are for convenience and may not be compatible with your db
version?
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From:
[hidden email] [mailto:
[hidden email]] On
Behalf Of Jacopo Cappellato
Sent: Saturday, 28 January 2006 10:45 p.m.
To: OFBiz Project Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Dev - keep postgresql jdbc driver in ofbiz?
Hi Jacques,
these are good points.
Well, both your two questions are already addressed by the ASF policies
(see the link in my previous post for more details), but here we are not
still so formal ;-)
The idea is that there are binding and non-binding votes: everyone in
the list can express a non-binding vote; only the contributors and
developers of the project can express binding votes.
Votes are represented by a number between -1 and +1. Even if formally
only the binding votes are considered, all the votes are important to
get the community feeling about a decision.
But I think that now, for the postgresql jdbc issue, we could all
express a vote without worrying too much about binding/non-binding ones...
Jacopo
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
> I agree, that's the essence of democracy !
> Some questions arise :
> 1) But who can vote and why ?
> 2) May someone (or a group) has a veto ? (like in UNO security council or
else)
> etc., to be continued...
>
> Jacques
>
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev