Re: Dev - LGPL Issues

Posted by Jacopo Cappellato on
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Dev-LGPL-Issues-tp166670p166671.html

David,

about your first and third point, I think this is interesting:

http://mail-archive.objectweb.org/geronimo/2003-12/msg00001.html

Jacopo

PS: I think that another annoying library is the jcalendar.jar (LGPL)...


David E. Jones wrote:

>
> In this effort to isolate libraries with certain licenses most of the
> critical ones are just fine in the license area, with one rather
> annoying exception: Carol.
>
> This is used by JOTM for the underlying communication and such, and is
> LGPL. This is a pain because we can't really run anything without a
> transaction manager... So, creatively thinking of a few options:
>
> 1. is it possible to use JOTM without this?
> 2. we could see if they would be willing to change the license, or do a
> multiple license with something like MPL
> 3. we could look into using whatever Geronimo uses...
>
> Some other annoying ones, but not quite so critical: JasperReports and
> Shark. We don't rely on these too much right now, but we have things for
> both of them, and it would be nice in some areas to do more with both...
>
> -David
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

 
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev