Re: Dev - Replacing JOTM and Carol...

Posted by Vinay Agarwal on
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Dev-Replacing-JOTM-and-Carol-tp167754p167765.html

David,

 

My two cents are that it may be OK to lose some flexibility (as you mentioned earlier in March) and move on since a lot depends upon this change (license, JDK version etc.).

 

Regards,

Vinay Agarwal

 

So, we could ship with Geronimo instead of the container stuff, but we have various classpath issues to resolve. We could take all of the third party libraries we use and put them under the geronimo/ repository directory using their directory organization conventions, and then in the OFBiz build have it drop all jars it makes under the geronimo/repository directory, and then refer to those in probably 2 EARs (one for framework, one for application that would depend on the framework EAR).

 

There is some more unpleasantness... If we can't find a way to refer to certain directories in their current locations but instead are forced to put them in a jar file, we are going to lose some convenient change and retry stuff we can do now, mainly with the scripts on the classpath (all files in each component/script directory, mostly simple-method XML files).

 

 


 
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev