Re: Dev - No more LGPL jars under the base, application and framework folders

Posted by Hans Bakker on May 27, 2006; 8:07am
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Dev-this-week-s-development-blog-is-done-tp168137p168143.html

On Saturday 27 May 2006 12:52, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> I agree that it's very important that someone (David Jones) has admin
> privileges on the ASF SVN server so that he can manage permissions and
> the migration of the source code from our current server to the new one.
> As soon as David has these rights (Yoav, David W., do you have any hints
> about this subject?) everything will be easier.
> About the structure, what about the following one:
>
> trunk/ofbiz
> trunk/website
>

I would appreciate if a third could be added, currently called the
opentravelsystem, but now evolved into a shared ofbiz system addon where more
customers/sites can share the same physical installation. The first sites
will go in production the next few months.

Is this possible?

Congratulations with the fact that LGPL packages are now removed!

> ?
>
> It has been recently suggested by Andy in the thread "specialized and
> website folders in SVN tree" in this list.
>
> About the ASF Jira server: it would be really nice to setup things to
> get a mailing list for jira issues (Yoav, David W. do you think it is
> possible to set up it?)
>
> Have a nice weekend,
>
> Jacopo
>
> David E. Jones wrote:
> > Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> >> Now that JOTM has been replaced with Geronimo TM I think that all the
> >> dependencies to LGPLed jars has been resolved (the jars are now optional
> >> components under the specialized folder). Is this true?
> >
> > Yes, I think this is true at this point and we can now put something in
> > the ASF SVN server without LGPL jars that will build and run straight
> > from SVN (which has been the goal of course).
> >
> >> If so, should we move the code to the ASF SVN? When? During this
> >> weekend, the next one, or later on?
> >
> > I think this depends on what needs to be done and who can do it, and I'm
> > not totally clear on this yet. It look like (from INFRA-741) that the
> > repository already exists and we should all have commit privileges.
> >
> > Of course, there are some issues still with who can commit where, and I'm
> > not sure if it's possible to configure that given the way the ASF server
> > is setup, and if so then who could do it (would you have permissions for
> > this David Welton?).
> >
> > Also, it would be better to wait until we have done the Jira move as well
> > (which should be soon, I want to make sure at least Si also has his
> > account setup there; both Jacopo and I have dev access setup).
> >
> >> Should we discuss about the new SVN layout? I.e. what to do with the
> >> website and specialized folders etc...
> >
> > I don't think we should change the structure at all. I propose that
> > everything except the specialized directory in the current SVN should be
> > put in the ASF SVN server and then removed from the current SVN server
> > (though of course they will still be available if revisions previous to
> > the removal are checked out).
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

--
Regards,
Hans Bakker
ANT Websystems Co.,Ltd (http://www.antwebsystems.com)

If you want to verify that this message really originates from
from the above person, download the public key from:
http://www.antwebsystems.com/hbakkerAntwebsystems.asc
 
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev