Re: Dev - No more LGPL jars under the base, application and framework folders

Posted by David E. Jones on May 31, 2006; 8:06am
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Dev-this-week-s-development-blog-is-done-tp168137p168152.html


This is taken care of in SVN rev 7721.

For anyone watching in: I didn't test this new code as I'm not sure of a good example, so if anyone runs into an issue with it let me know...

-David


Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> As pointed out by crisg in
> http://ofbizwiki.go-integral.com/Wiki.jsp?page=LibrariesIncludedInOFBiz
>
> the xom-1.0d25.jar in the framework/webapp component is licensed under
> the LGPL license.
>
> After a quick review it seems that the code that is using it is in the
> we webapp component: org.ofbiz.webapp.barcode.*
>
> The three classes there define an OFBiz transform ("barcodeTransform")
> that is initiated in the FreeMarkerWorker class; however the tag is not
> really used in the system.
>
> So I think we should move this stuff under the specialized folder.
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> Andrew Sykes wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> I can imagine that having a split applications and framework layout
>> would lead to lots of posts to the mailing list asking why a specific
>> combination of the two weren't working. Obviously an increase in the
>> number of people generating content that says OFBiz doesn't work isn't
>> really good for the brand profile.
>>
>> Although it would make downloading quicker!
>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

 
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev