Re: Dev - No more LGPL jars under the base, application and framework folders

Posted by Jacopo Cappellato on May 29, 2006; 6:09am
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Dev-this-week-s-development-blog-is-done-tp168137p168156.html

David,

the only reason I've proposed this is that the website directory is not
needed to run or customize OFBiz... by the way this is a detail and is
not urgent at all.
Maybe it's better to keep things as they are now and go on with the
migration to ASF.

Jacopo



David E. Jones wrote:

> I commented in another message about the opentravelsystem component stuff. This is the course that we discussed quite a while back, and I'd rather stick to it than expand the scope of the OFBiz to ASF move before we're even done...
>
> Anyway, on the directory organization...
>
> It sounds like you're proposing that the website directory be moved out from under the main OFBiz directory. Is that correct? Is there a particular reason for this?
>
> I've thought about splitting out the applications directory in a similar way, and perhaps even creating a "framework" directory that would contain everything except the applications directory, but in a way it's a pain to have that be a peer to the framework directory, and if we did it with that we should do it with the "hot-deploy" and "specialized" directories too...
>
> Anyone have any thoughts on this?
>
> BTW, _if_ we do any directory reorganization it will happen in the current SVN repository and be before the ASF move. I want the initial ASF SVN check-in to be the same (as much as possible...) to a specific SVN revision in the current repository...
>
> -David
>
>
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> Hans,
>>
>> I think that you have introduced an interesting point about the
>> opentravelsystem component: should we move some of the specialized
>> components to the ASF together with the core OFBiz?
>>
>> For me it's ok to move the OTS component to the ASF, by the way I'd
>> prefer a structure like this:
>>
>> trunk/ofbiz
>> trunk/website
>> trunk/specialized/opentravelsystem
>>
>> What others think about this?
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> Hans Bakker wrote:
>>> On Saturday 27 May 2006 12:52, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>> I agree that it's very important that someone (David Jones) has admin
>>>> privileges on the ASF SVN server so that he can manage permissions and
>>>> the migration of the source code from our current server to the new one.
>>>> As soon as David has these rights (Yoav, David W., do you have any hints
>>>> about this subject?) everything will be easier.
>>>> About the structure, what about the following one:
>>>>
>>>> trunk/ofbiz
>>>> trunk/website
>>>>
>>> I would appreciate if a third could be added, currently called the
>>> opentravelsystem, but now evolved into a shared ofbiz system addon where more
>>> customers/sites can share the same physical installation. The first sites
>>> will go in production the next few months.
>>>
>>> Is this possible?
>>>
>>> Congratulations with the fact that LGPL packages are now removed!
>>>
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>

 
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev