Login  Register

Re: XSD schema conversion anyone?

Posted by Iain Fogg on Aug 08, 2006; 7:59am
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/XSD-schema-conversion-anyone-tp170452p170462.html

David,

You probably worked out that I've only been playing with OFBiz for a few
weeks :-)

Yep, I've got the SVN from a day or two back.

Thanks for the pointer to being able to create new product content types
- I'll have to look into those.

Cheers, Iain

David E Jones wrote:

>
> That's a little bit different then...
>
> What you probably need/want is some code to take in the incoming ONIX  
> files and map the information to existing OFBiz entities rather than  
> creating new ones.
>
> As you're doing the mapping you'll get into the issue you brought up  
> here about what should go where. Different things will most likely be  
> best handled in different ways. For example, the "publisher" would be  
> handled well by a ProductFeature, but the title and ISBN would not as  
> they are unique to each book. Those could be put into ProductContent  
> records (with new ProductContentTypes) and handled with existing  
> code, or perhaps even just added as fields to the Product entity, and  
> then only small changes would be needed in the ProductSearch code (or  
> no changes... it's been a while since I wrote it so I don't remember  
> exactly).
>
> In any case, I think you'll find pretty flexible and efficient  
> performing search capabilities in the ProductSearch stuff. Make sure  
> you're looking at a moderately recent version of OFBiz (ie not one of  
> the ancient releases, like 3.0.0 or something).
>
> -David
>
>
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:43 AM, Iain Fogg wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>> Basically I'm looking to augment the standard OFBiz functionality  
>> with functionality specifically required in the book selling  
>> business. As an absolute minimum, I need to be able to periodically  
>> refresh the OFBiz product and supplier data with a subset of the  
>> ONIX data (new titles, price changes, supplier info, etc).  I also  
>> want to look at ways of providing a richer set of search options  
>> specific to the book trade (eg, title, publisher, ISBN, etc), and  to
>> have all of the ONIX data available for back-office (and  sometimes
>> front-of-house) enquiries.
>>
>> I've seen it suggested that one of the ways to provide richer  
>> content in the OFBiz Product database is to use the Feature  
>> mechanism. I've played around with this a little bit, and it might  
>> work, but I'd need to be convinced about performance and  
>> maintainability. The ONIX dataset can contain hundreds of thousands  
>> of records, and modelling these with the OFBiz Feature feature  seems
>> a bit clumsy. I'm not sure what the impact would be on search  queries.
>>
>> I'm still exploring  my requirements, and at this stage about the  
>> only thing I know for sure is that I need to synch ONIX data with  
>> OFBiz to ensure OFBiz is using up-to-date info. Probably the other  
>> thing I know for sure is that I need richer search options, and  
>> response needs to be  reasonable.
>>
>> At the end of the day, one of the things I need to work out is how  
>> to "integrate" (and I use the term loosely), ONIX and OFBiz.
>>
>> Cheers, Iain
>>
>>
>> David E. Jones wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Is the intent to map it to the OFBiz data model or services? I'm  
>>> guessing that's not the case if you're trying to create entities  
>>> to  represent it.
>>>
>>> If you're trying to create a data model for an XML Schema and not  
>>> mapping it to an existing data model, then you'll have to design  a  
>>> data model to match it. XML is an hierarchical data structure  
>>> which  is very different from a relational (table-based) one. Some  
>>> design  will have to be done to decide how to structure things  
>>> because there  are no natural equivalencies. There are, of course,  
>>> some common  patterns for dealing with hierarchical and other  
>>> structures in SQL,  but doing an effective mapping requires more  of
>>> an understanding of  the data model so that the same data can  be
>>> captured in both places  and this is very difficult to  automate.
>>> You might find some  commercial tools that give you a  good first
>>> pass though... ie to go  from XSD to SQL DDL.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 7, 2006, at 6:51 PM, Iain Fogg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Chris,
>>>>
>>>> Good question, and this probably exposes my ignorance of XST.  
>>>> Maybe  it's not the right technology. Maybe I need to find a tool  
>>>> that can  translate from XSD -> SQL. Then it would be  
>>>> straightforward to map  the relational table defs to the OFBiz  
>>>> entity def. My small brain  can't get round the mapping of the  
>>>> hierarchical XML Schema to a  relational one - at least not given  
>>>> it's size. Maybe when I was  younger :-)
>>>>
>>>> In case anyone is interested, the schema I want to map is the  
>>>> ONIX  schema (used in the book trade).
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Iain
>>>>
>>>> Chris Howe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't you need to know
>>>>> what the source elements are in order to make an XST
>>>>> to entity def?  Absent knowing the structure of your
>>>>> source it wouldn't matter what someone else's XST
>>>>> looks like, it wouldn't work with yours.
>>>>>
>>>>> --- Iain Fogg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> That's my question...has anyone already buit an XST
>>>>>> to do the conversion to OFBiz Entity defs?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the XSD defines the layout.
>>>>>>> the XML is where the Entities definitions are.
>>>>>>> you can try using an XST file to convert.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Iain Fogg sent the following on 8/7/2006 7:53 AM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have a slightly complicated XML Schema (.xsd)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> that I would like to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> import into OFBiz.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Has anyone written a tool to convert XML schemas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> into OFBiz  entity
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> definitions?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers, Iain
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/411 -
>>>>>> Release Date: 7/08/2006
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/411 - Release Date:  
>>>> 7/08/2006
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/411 - Release Date:  
>> 7/08/2006
>>
>
>
>



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/411 - Release Date: 7/08/2006