Posted by
Jacques Le Roux on
Sep 18, 2006; 4:25pm
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/i10n-properties-and-iCLA-tp172561p172562.html
I finally found the answer here :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-157___________________________________________________
Si Chen [17/août/06 05:40 PM]
David,
Would Rodrigo and Victor need to add the ASL header and re-submit them, or is it OK if Jacques or I added them. Technically, when
you add files to this JIRA, it already asks that you agree to contribute under the ASL, so is that technically enough?
Si
[ Show » ]
Si Chen [17/août/06 05:40 PM] David, Would Rodrigo and Victor need to add the ASL header and re-submit them, or is it OK if Jacques
or I added them. Technically, when you add files to this JIRA, it already asks that you agree to contribute under the ASL, so is
that technically enough? Si
[ Lien permanent | Supprimer | « Hide ]
David E. Jones [17/août/06 10:54 PM]
In general all patches submitted with new files and all new files attached to an issue should have the ASL header in place to make
it clear. We should make a practice of rejecting new files without the header and just ask the contributor to re-submit the patch
with the proper header, explaining where they can get it and such (ie the APACHE2_HEADERS file).
Still, that practice is really mostly an extra precaution type of thing and while it clarifies things I don't think it's totally
necessary, so in a case like this where the contributor has acknowledged that it will be ASL2 licensed, we can just throw in the
header.
___________________________________________________
So it seems that it only need that the person check the case "ASL2" in Jira, is that right ?
Jacques
> Hi,
>
> Is it mandatory to have an iCLA for new i10n properties files ?
>
> I guess I have already asked this question, but I can't remember or find the reponse in Jira.
>
> Jacques
>