Re: Workeffort Bug vs New Feature

Posted by Ean Schuessler on Jun 15, 2007; 6:34am
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Workeffort-Bug-vs-New-Feature-tp181847p181850.html

On Thursday 14 June 2007 04:14:18 pm Adrian Crum wrote:
> In other words, it's okay for the system to function incorrectly, as long
> as it consistently functions incorrectly.
>
> ;)
>
> If you prefer to keep the Workeffort calendar broken, that's fine with me.
> When new users ask why release version 4 has only 29 days in November, I
> can point them to this discussion and let them know that November 30th was
> a new feature that didn't make it into the release.

Ha! Ha ha! Well played.

I haven't read this patch but it seems like this bug makes us look rather
foolish. I'd vote +1 for that going in even though we are in a freeze, if I
was the voting type.

Seems like the screen already exists so this isn't "new" even if the
implementation is moves around a little. Any new bugs would have to do be
pretty significant to compete with a 29 day November.

--
Ean Schuessler, CTO
[hidden email]
214-720-0700 x 315
Brainfood, Inc.
http://www.brainfood.com