> +1 beta
>
> probably the only way it will ever get any attention.
>
> David E Jones sent the following on 11/26/2007 11:44 AM:
>>
>> On Nov 26, 2007, at 9:19 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> BTW I think the time is coming to answer questions like in
>>>
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Demo+and+Test+Setup+Guide?focusedCommentId=2604#comment-2604>>>
>>>
>>> What to you think, you developpers ?
>>
>> I think first things first...
>>
>> The first question for the release4.0 branch is: is it ready from a
>> code, etc perspective to be released?
>>
>> I asked a question a few weeks ago to try to determine how many
>> people
>> are using the release branch and have found it sufficient for even a
>> "beta" label (which technically even the trunk SHOULD have, ie no one
>> should commit anything that isn't at least point tested)?
>>
>> It only takes a couple of hours to build the release and get it
>> uploaded
>> and such. I pretty much have to do that as I'm the one who has been
>> signing the releases and such (it is my signature in the KEYS file,
>> etc).
>>
>> Before that happens we need to make sure we're ready for a release
>> as a
>> community, and then the PMC needs to vote on a candidate revision
>> in the
>> branch for a binary release.
>>
>> Right now I personally haven't tested it much, and I realistically
>> won't
>> be able to, but I am willing to vote for it if there is enough
>> community
>> feedback that it is in a good state for release. In fact, I'd be
>> ecstatic to see this happen! Each PMC member needs to consider
>> their own
>> criteria for the binary release being ready, and right now this is
>> mine.
>>
>> So, that gets us back to the first things first thingy mentioned
>> above...
>>
>> Please comment everyone so we can get this moving forward!
>>
>> I'll leave this on the dev list for now and we can start something
>> in a
>> bit on the user list if there isn't enough feedback here.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>