[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-149) Better describe complex party relationships

Posted by Nicolas Malin (Jira) on Sep 01, 2011; 5:34pm
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/jira-Commented-OFBIZ-149-Better-describe-complex-party-relationships-tp3784269.html


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13095450#comment-13095450 ]

BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-149:
----------------------------------

there has been a lot of changes since this issue.
can this be closed and use
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3851

> Better describe complex party relationships
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-149
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-149
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: party
>            Reporter: Chris Howe
>            Assignee: David E. Jones
>         Attachments: PartyRelationship.patch, necessaryChangeLog.txt
>
>
> Change to the party data model to support relationships where parties act in several capacities (roles) and allowing polynary relationships.
> If someone could describe a situation where the direcition of the role matters (partyIdTo/partyIdFrom) and  where the roleType is insuficient to understand the direction I will try to come up with a solution.  I'm trying to understand if simply better role designations would alleviate ambiguity or if there is a real need to support direction.
> I began a discussion on this topic, there has yet to be any response
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ofbiz-dev/200608.mbox/%3c20060809155147.18528.qmail@...%3e

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira