> OpenJDK IS the official JDK this time around. So while a particular
> platform may not be built/completed yet, its open source so anyone
> can contribute.
>
> On the timing, I would suggest that making sure that ofbiz is
> Java 7 tolerant is the first priority, then when you want new
> features think about whether you can justify locking users of the
> old Java 6 out of ofbiz. Unfortunately some enterprises are very
> slow to move - and forcing people to move is what MS are always
> accused of.
>
> David
>
> On Wednesday 05 Oct 2011, Scott Gray wrote:
>> You can't even get Java 7 for OSX currently (and no I'm not talking
>> OpenJDK), as far as I can tell it's not expected until sometime in 2012.
>>
>> Regards
>> Scott
>>
>> On 6/10/2011, at 12:47 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> It seems to me that standard support (not payable) for Java 6 bug fixes
>>> is ending in July 2012, a bit more than 8 months...
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <
[hidden email]>
>>>
>>>>>> When is the EOL for java 6?
>>>>
>>>>
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html>>>> <
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html>-- One table
>>>> inside "Java SE Support Roadmap" is saying "Jul 2012" as EOL for Java
>>>> 6. -- Another table inside "Java for Business Support Roadmap" is
>>>> saying "Dec 2016" as EOL for Java 6.
>>>> I think for now and more then one year we can keep continuing to support
>>>> Java 6 for all development and production deployments purpose.
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> --
>>>> Ashish
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Scott Gray
> <
[hidden email]>wrote:
>>>>> -1
>>>>>
>>>>> When is the EOL for java 6? What is the rush? By switching to Java 7
>>>>> you are telling everyone who wants to use the latest OFBiz that they
>>>>> MUST use Java 7, there needs to be a good reason for that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Scott
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/10/2011, at 9:26 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>> Since, with java.nio.file, most important changes introduced by Java
>>>>>> 7
>>>>>
>>>>> are syntactic sugar (Coin project), I was more thinking about
>>>>>
>>>>>> a continued effort, not limited in time, hence no need for a branch.
>>>>>> It would just require a decision and to turn OFBiz development to
>>>>>> Java 7.
>>>>>
>>>>> But of course this is a community choice and we need neeed more people
>>>>> interested before taking any decision...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_version_history#Java_SE_7_.28July_28.
>>>>> 2C_2011.29
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Sascha Rodekamp" <
[hidden email]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for java 7
>>>>>>> But i think when updating the java version there are some parts of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>
>>>>> code
>>>>>
>>>>>>> we can improve with the new java features. I.e the try catch with
>>>>>
>>>>> resources
>>>>>
>>>>>>> or the new diamond operator for generics ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So why not creating a jira ticket and a separate branch, do some
>>>>>>> changes testing everything properly and merge back.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have a good day
>>>>>>> Sascha
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2011/10/4 Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As soon as we change things maybe. Not even sure it's really
>>>>>>>> needed, at least last updated were done in trunk. Java 7 does not
>>>>>>>> introduce much changes anyway...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: "BJ Freeman" <
[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think a branch would be appropriate
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 10/3/2011 3:50 AM:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> One day or another we will have to move to Java 7, I believe.
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://www.eclipse.org/jdt/ui/**r3_8/Java7news/whats-new-java-**7.html<
>>>>>
http://www.eclipse.org/jdt/ui/r3_8/Java7news/whats-new-java-7.html>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sascha Rodekamp
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Visit the new german OFBiz Blog:
http://www.ofbiz.biz>>>>>>> Lynx-Consulting GmbH
>>>>>>> Johanniskirchplatz 6
>>>>>>> D-33615 Bielefeld
>>>>>>>
http://www.lynx.de>