http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1311214-ofbiz-trunk-framework-base-config-test-containers-xml-tp4543699p4545781.html
> It may be completely unrelated to this... but I have two tests failing
> now; does it work for you? It could be as I am doing some local tests
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Apr 10, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
> > Pierre,
> >
> > I think you did not get my point. I don't want to restrict the use of
> the Geronimo approach I suggested (please read
> >
http://markmail.org/message/i4u5pijlclgtzwrm as I said in
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794) to the test-containers.
> > But want to be able to use it on all ports (like also url.properties and
> so on)
> >
> > For the Geronimo we need to use ports below 10000 since we will add
> 10000 to 50000 with this approach (having at most 5 instances of
> > OFBiz and test on the same machine seems acceptable to me).
> > So I suggest you to randomly pick some other ports for your own setting.
> >
> > If you see another way of doing (like proposed in
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4763 following
> >
http://markmail.org/message/mgmhrqchjjmo776q) please share your
> thoughts;
> >
> > We could have a specific shift for the test component for instance, like
> +28 or what not. Would be better to quickly find a right
> > setting for all ports than +1 harcoded like I did or +10000 like you
> did.... Then please contribute the mechanism, because your
> > OFBIZ-4794 patch would prevent the generalised Geronimo way, as I see it
> (ie +10000 to +50000, max 5 instances ) ...
> >
> > I must say I did not put a lot of thoughts in this yet. There are maybe
> more clever ways of doing, I just picked the easiest one
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > From: "Pierre Smits" <
[hidden email]>
> >> Hi Jacques,
> >>
> >> What annoyed me was that you bluntly upped the port numbers in
> >> test-containers.xml with +1, while I was under the impression that we
> were
> >> still discussing what ports to use. Especially when you mentioned in a
> >> previous message the Geronimo approach. Which is totally suitable for
> me.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, now I see a lot of statements in my Jenkins build jobs
> that
> >> ports 8010,9081 and 8445 are already in use by other application
> servers.
> >> Like many others I also have these these ports used by other servers.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Pierre
> >>
> >> Op 10 april 2012 12:16 schreef Jacques Le Roux <
>
[hidden email]
> >>> het volgende:
> >>
> >>> Mmm sorry Pierre,
> >>>
> >>> Not sure to get you, does something annoy you there? I'm open for
> >>> discussion, of course...
> >>>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>> From: "Pierre Smits" <
[hidden email]>
> >>>
> >>> Jee, Jacques,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for seeking consensus and NOT pushing your own agenda!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Op 9 april 2012 15:08 schreef <
[hidden email]> het volgende:
> >>>>
> >>>> Author: jleroux
> >>>>> Date: Mon Apr 9 13:08:37 2012
> >>>>> New Revision: 1311214
> >>>>>
> >>>>> URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1311214&view=rev<
>
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1311214&view=rev>
> >>>>> Log:
> >>>>> Adds 1 to all ports in order to be able to run concurrently an OFBiz
> >>>>> instance and a test instance on the same machine.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This closes "set different ports for testing in a CI environment
> (e.g.
> >>>>> Jenkins)"
https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794<
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Modified:
> >>>>> ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**config/test-containers.xml
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**config/test-containers.xml
> >>>>> URL:
> >>>>>
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**> >>>>> config/test-containers.xml?**rev=1311214&r1=1311213&r2=**
> >>>>> 1311214&view=diff<
>
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1311214&r1=1311213&r2=1311214&view=diff> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ==============================**==============================**
> >>>>> ==================
> >>>>> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**config/test-containers.xml
> (original)
> >>>>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**config/test-containers.xml Mon Apr
> 9
> >>>>> 13:08:37 2012
> >>>>> @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
> >>>>> <container name="naming-container"
> >>>>> class="org.ofbiz.base.**container.**NamingServiceContainer">
> >>>>> - <property name="port" value="1099"/>
> >>>>> + <property name="port" value="1100"/>
> >>>>> </container>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <!-- RMI Service Dispatcher -->
> >>>>> <container name="rmi-dispatcher"
> >>>>> class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**RmiServiceContainer">
> >>>>> <property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/>
> >>>>> <property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/>
> >>>>> - <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/>
> >>>>> + <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/>
> >>>>> <property name="delegator-name" value="test"/>
> >>>>> <property name="client-factory"
> >>>>> value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**socket.ssl.**SSLClientSocketFactory"/>
> >>>>> <property name="server-factory"
> >>>>> value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**socket.ssl.**SSLServerSocketFactory"/>
> >>>>> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ under the License.
> >>>>> <property name="admin-user" value="system"/>
> >>>>> <property name="admin-pass" value="ofbiz"/>
> >>>>> <property name="iiop-host" value="127.0.0.1"/>
> >>>>> - <property name="iiop-port" value="2000"/>
> >>>>> + <property name="iiop-port" value="2001"/>
> >>>>> </container>
> >>>>> -->
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ under the License.
> >>>>> <property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/>
> >>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="200"/>
> >>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
> >>>>> - <property name="port" value="8009"/>
> >>>>> + <property name="port" value="8010"/>
> >>>>> <property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/>
> >>>>> <property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/>
> >>>>> <property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/>
> >>>>> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ under the License.
> >>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
> >>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
> >>>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
> >>>>> - <property name="port" value="8080"/>
> >>>>> + <property name="port" value="8081"/>
> >>>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
> >>>>> <property name="server" value=""/>
> >>>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
> >>>>> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ under the License.
> >>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
> >>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
> >>>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
> >>>>> - <property name="port" value="8443"/>
> >>>>> + <property name="port" value="8444"/>
> >>>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
> >>>>> <property name="server" value=""/>
> >>>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
>