> Hi Scott,
>
> Inline..
>
> From: "Scott Gray" <
[hidden email]>
>> Hi Jacques,
>>
>> Have you tested this? Changing the relationship from one to many
>> implies that there is a contactMechId on the GeoPoint entity but
>> that isn't the case right?
>
> Why would we need contactMechId on GeoPoint ? The relation is
> established through geoPointId and that's enough. Same for Facility.
>
> > Also was it your intention that the relationship name now becomes
>> PointGeoPoint?
>
> Erwan did not like to call getRelated("Geo pointGeoPoint"), and I
> agree it's not beautiful, even if it works (see Jira for more...).
>
>
> Jacques
>
>> Regards
>> Scott
>>
>> HotWax Media
>>
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com>>
>> On 6/11/2009, at 7:26 AM,
[hidden email] wrote:
>>
>>> Author: jleroux
>>> Date: Thu Nov 5 18:26:27 2009
>>> New Revision: 833113
>>>
>>> URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=833113&view=rev>>> Log:
>>> Change "Geo Point" title to "Point"
>>> Change the type of relation for Postal Address to GeoPoint from
>>> one to many. Because of the elevation field in GeoPoint. A bit
>>> scifi for now, but maybe useful one day...)
>>> Thanks to a discussion with Erwan "Relation title not needed on
>>> Facility entity" at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
>>> OFBIZ-3153 - OFBIZ-3153
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>>>
>>> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>>> URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=833113&r1=833112&r2=833113&view=diff>>> = = = = = = = =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> ====================================================================
>>> --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>>> (original)
>>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Thu
>>> Nov 5 18:26:27 2009
>>> @@ -1171,7 +1171,7 @@
>>> <relation type="one" fk-name="POST_ADDR_PCGEO"
>>> title="PostalCode" rel-entity-name="Geo">
>>> <key-map field-name="postalCodeGeoId" rel-field-
>>> name="geoId"/>
>>> </relation>
>>> - <relation type="one" fk-name="POST_ADDR_GEOPT" title="Geo
>>> Point" rel-entity-name="GeoPoint">
>>> + <relation type="many" fk-name="POST_ADDR_GEOPT"
>>> title="Point" rel-entity-name="GeoPoint"> <!-- because of the
>>> elevation field in GeoPoint we may face a many relationship in
>>> future -->
>>> <key-map field-name="geoPointId"/>
>>> </relation>
>>> <index name="ADDRESS1_IDX">
>>>
>>> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>>> URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=833113&r1=833112&r2=833113&view=diff>>> = = = = = = = =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> ====================================================================
>>> --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>>> (original)
>>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>>> Thu Nov 5 18:26:27 2009
>>> @@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@
>>> <relation type="many" rel-entity-name="FacilityTypeAttr">
>>> <key-map field-name="facilityTypeId"/>
>>> </relation>
>>> - <relation type="one" fk-name="FACILITY_GEOPT" title="Geo
>>> Point" rel-entity-name="GeoPoint">
>>> + <relation type="one" fk-name="FACILITY_GEOPT"
>>> title="Point" rel-entity-name="GeoPoint">
>>> <key-map field-name="geoPointId"/>
>>> </relation>
>>> </entity>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>