Re: Proposal for some changes to the fields of AcctgTrans/AcctgTransEntry

Posted by Anil Patel-3 on
URL: http://ofbiz.116.s1.nabble.com/Proposal-for-some-changes-to-the-fields-of-AcctgTrans-AcctgTransEntry-tp785982p786059.html

Jacopo,
Thanks for thinking through this. Makes sense to me.

Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2009/sponsors/sponsors

On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:36 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> I would like to introduce the following changes to the entity definitions of AcctgTrans and AcctgTransEntry:
>
> 1) move the field AcctgTransEntry.currencyUomId to AcctgTrans.currencyUomId (but keeping the AcctgTransEntry.origCurrencyUomId as is now)
> 2) add the new field AcctgTrans.totalAmount: for a valid transaction the field (its absolute value) will have to match with absolute value of the sum of all credits (or debits); before a transaction it is posted, the system will check that AcctgTrans.totalAmount = sum of all credits (AcctgTransEntry) = sum of all debits (AcctgTransEntry)
>
> Main reasons for this:
> a) since the records in AcctgTrans actually represents the lines of a Journal, it makes sense to have in them all the fields required by journals (type/description of the transaction, date and amount)
> b) the user workflow will be improved: when the AcctgTrans is created (before the entries) the user already know the amount to be posted (and split into the different Ledgers)
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jacopo
>