version 11.4 or 10.4 most stable?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
27 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: version 11.4 or 10.4 most stable?

Heidi Dehaes - Olagos
Hello,

Ok that seems me a good idea.
But where to find these commits? and from which commit on to start.

Heidi

2012/1/31, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]>:

> if you want control of your code and want the latest and greatest I
> suggest you maintain your own code repository, and use the commits after
> reviewing them. Then run you full tests against the the complete system.
>
> Info Olagos sent the following on 1/27/2012 2:48 AM:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can anyone inform me about the latest versions of Ofbiz.
>>
>> Is version 11.4 or rather 10.4 the most stable ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Heidi
>>
>


--
Olagos bvba
http://www.olagos.eu <http://www.olagos.eu/>
http://www.olagos.com
http://www.olagos.be
http://www.olagos.nl
Olagos team
Heesterbos 5
2570 Duffel
Belgium
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: version 11.4 or 10.4 most stable?

Adrian Crum-3
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
That approach is what I like to call an internal fork. It is a good way
to maintain control of the codebase, but it is expensive to maintain.

-Adrian

On 1/31/2012 10:15 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:

> if you want control of your code and want the latest and greatest I
> suggest you maintain your own code repository, and use the commits after
> reviewing them. Then run you full tests against the the complete system.
>
> Info Olagos sent the following on 1/27/2012 2:48 AM:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can anyone inform me about the latest versions of Ofbiz.
>>
>> Is version 11.4 or rather 10.4 the most stable ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Heidi
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: version 11.4 or 10.4 most stable?

Paul Foxworthy
In reply to this post by Heidi Dehaes - Olagos
Hi Heidi,

See https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/ofbiz-source-repository-and-access.html

Fisheye will also show you a history of commits. See https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/ofbiz and https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/graph/ofbiz .

From the commit graph you can see that release 11.04 was branched on 2 May 2011 from revision r1098578 of trunk.

Cheers

Paul Foxworthy

Info Olagos wrote
Hello,

Ok that seems me a good idea.
But where to find these commits? and from which commit on to start.

Heidi

2012/1/31, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]>:
> if you want control of your code and want the latest and greatest I
> suggest you maintain your own code repository, and use the commits after
> reviewing them. Then run you full tests against the the complete system.
>
> Info Olagos sent the following on 1/27/2012 2:48 AM:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can anyone inform me about the latest versions of Ofbiz.
>>
>> Is version 11.4 or rather 10.4 the most stable ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Heidi
>>
>


--
Olagos bvba
http://www.olagos.eu <http://www.olagos.eu/>
http://www.olagos.com
http://www.olagos.be
http://www.olagos.nl
Olagos team
Heesterbos 5
2570 Duffel
Belgium
--
Coherent Software Australia Pty Ltd
http://www.coherentsoftware.com.au/

Bonsai ERP, the all-inclusive ERP system
http://www.bonsaierp.com.au/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: version 11.4 or 10.4 most stable?

Heidi Dehaes - Olagos
Thanks Paul,

Now i understand the way you work with the release and the commits.

Ok then i think to install however version 11.4 and installing the
commits everytime.

Regards,
Heidi

2012/1/31, Paul Foxworthy <[hidden email]>:

> Hi Heidi,
>
> See
> https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/ofbiz-source-repository-and-access.html
>
> Fisheye will also show you a history of commits. See
> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/ofbiz and
> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/graph/ofbiz .
>
> From the commit graph you can see that release 11.04 was branched on 2 May
> 2011 from revision r1098578 of trunk.
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul Foxworthy
>
>
> Info Olagos wrote
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Ok that seems me a good idea.
>> But where to find these commits? and from which commit on to start.
>>
>> Heidi
>>
>> 2012/1/31, BJ Freeman &lt;bjfree@&gt;:
>>> if you want control of your code and want the latest and greatest I
>>> suggest you maintain your own code repository, and use the commits after
>>> reviewing them. Then run you full tests against the the complete system.
>>>
>>> Info Olagos sent the following on 1/27/2012 2:48 AM:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone inform me about the latest versions of Ofbiz.
>>>>
>>>> Is version 11.4 or rather 10.4 the most stable ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Heidi
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Olagos bvba
>> http://www.olagos.eu &lt;http://www.olagos.eu/&gt;
>> http://www.olagos.com
>> http://www.olagos.be
>> http://www.olagos.nl
>> Olagos team
>> Heesterbos 5
>> 2570 Duffel
>> Belgium
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/version-11-4-or-10-4-most-stable-tp4333100p4344541.html
> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


--
Olagos bvba
http://www.olagos.eu <http://www.olagos.eu/>
http://www.olagos.com
http://www.olagos.be
http://www.olagos.nl
Olagos team
Heesterbos 5
2570 Duffel
Belgium
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: version 11.4 or 10.4 most stable?

BJ Freeman
In reply to this post by Heidi Dehaes - Olagos
https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/mailing-lists.html
[hidden email]
this will give you thee actual commit files.

Info Olagos sent the following on 1/31/2012 2:29 AM:

> Hello,
>
> Ok that seems me a good idea.
> But where to find these commits? and from which commit on to start.
>
> Heidi
>
> 2012/1/31, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]>:
>> if you want control of your code and want the latest and greatest I
>> suggest you maintain your own code repository, and use the commits after
>> reviewing them. Then run you full tests against the the complete system.
>>
>> Info Olagos sent the following on 1/27/2012 2:48 AM:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Can anyone inform me about the latest versions of Ofbiz.
>>>
>>> Is version 11.4 or rather 10.4 the most stable ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Heidi
>>>
>>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: version 11.4 or 10.4 most stable?

BJ Freeman
In reply to this post by Adrian Crum-3
yes, but compared to keep the code so a change does not effect custom
code is better than having to redo a large code base it depends on.

Adrian Crum sent the following on 1/31/2012 3:22 AM:

> That approach is what I like to call an internal fork. It is a good way
> to maintain control of the codebase, but it is expensive to maintain.
>
> -Adrian
>
> On 1/31/2012 10:15 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>> if you want control of your code and want the latest and greatest I
>> suggest you maintain your own code repository, and use the commits after
>> reviewing them. Then run you full tests against the the complete system.
>>
>> Info Olagos sent the following on 1/27/2012 2:48 AM:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Can anyone inform me about the latest versions of Ofbiz.
>>>
>>> Is version 11.4 or rather 10.4 the most stable ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Heidi
>>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: version 11.4 or 10.4 most stable?

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Consider also https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/SVN+Tips+-+svn_load_dirs+Vendor+Branch

Jacques

From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>

> yes, but compared to keep the code so a change does not effect custom
> code is better than having to redo a large code base it depends on.
>
> Adrian Crum sent the following on 1/31/2012 3:22 AM:
>> That approach is what I like to call an internal fork. It is a good way
>> to maintain control of the codebase, but it is expensive to maintain.
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>> On 1/31/2012 10:15 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>> if you want control of your code and want the latest and greatest I
>>> suggest you maintain your own code repository, and use the commits after
>>> reviewing them. Then run you full tests against the the complete system.
>>>
>>> Info Olagos sent the following on 1/27/2012 2:48 AM:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone inform me about the latest versions of Ofbiz.
>>>>
>>>> Is version 11.4 or rather 10.4 the most stable ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Heidi
>>>>
>>
12