Is there a reason to keep the sourceforge logo around on the web site?
-- David N. Welton - http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/ Linux, Open Source Consulting - http://www.dedasys.com/ |
I guess the java.net logo has the same issue... We've kept these around because we do still have accounts on sf.net and java.net because ofbiz was previously hosted on both of them. Is there any policy about removing such things, ie either the logos/ links or the actual projects? It might be a good idea to clean up these old accounts, ie get rid of them... -David On Sep 11, 2006, at 5:35 AM, David Welton wrote: > Is there a reason to keep the sourceforge logo around on the web site? > > -- > David N. Welton > - http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/ > > Linux, Open Source Consulting > - http://www.dedasys.com/ |
> We've kept these around because we do still have accounts on sf.net
> and java.net because ofbiz was previously hosted on both of them. The java.net one doesn't link anywhere specific. Were it me, I think I would eliminate it just to reduce clutter. The SF one in particular, though, links to the project, which might lead some people astray... > Is there any policy about removing such things, ie either the logos/ > links or the actual projects? It might be a good idea to clean up > these old accounts, ie get rid of them... I don't think they're really a problem - I'd just put prominent links on both to the current location of OFBiz, and perhaps shut down those portions of their services that they allow you to. -- David N. Welton - http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/ Linux, Open Source Consulting - http://www.dedasys.com/ |
Thanks for your feedback on this David. We hadn't even posted news entries on sf.net or java.net about the ASF move, but that is now fixed. I updated the web site pages to remove the header links and just include side bar links on the home page and make it clear that they are old listings. Hopefully now if anyone finds OFBiz through sf.net or java.net it will push them to the ASF ofbiz site, and for now the incubator status page as well. I have removed or disabled most of the resources on the sf.net and java.net sites, but the java.net site project edit page seems to be bugging out now, so I'll play with that later. The information there is fairly simple, but if anyone has a chance to take a look at it I'd appreciate feedback or notice of anything that's wrong or a bit dumb... ;) -David On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:56 AM, David Welton wrote: >> We've kept these around because we do still have accounts on sf.net >> and java.net because ofbiz was previously hosted on both of them. > > The java.net one doesn't link anywhere specific. Were it me, I think > I would eliminate it just to reduce clutter. The SF one in > particular, though, links to the project, which might lead some people > astray... > >> Is there any policy about removing such things, ie either the logos/ >> links or the actual projects? It might be a good idea to clean up >> these old accounts, ie get rid of them... > > I don't think they're really a problem - I'd just put prominent links > on both to the current location of OFBiz, and perhaps shut down those > portions of their services that they allow you to. > > -- > David N. Welton > - http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/ > > Linux, Open Source Consulting > - http://www.dedasys.com/ |
Administrator
|
Maybe we could create an "Old Stuffs" boxe to group together all these old stuffs ?
Jacques > > Thanks for your feedback on this David. We hadn't even posted news > entries on sf.net or java.net about the ASF move, but that is now fixed. > > I updated the web site pages to remove the header links and just > include side bar links on the home page and make it clear that they > are old listings. Hopefully now if anyone finds OFBiz through sf.net > or java.net it will push them to the ASF ofbiz site, and for now the > incubator status page as well. > > I have removed or disabled most of the resources on the sf.net and > java.net sites, but the java.net site project edit page seems to be > bugging out now, so I'll play with that later. > > The information there is fairly simple, but if anyone has a chance to > take a look at it I'd appreciate feedback or notice of anything > that's wrong or a bit dumb... ;) > > -David > > > On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:56 AM, David Welton wrote: > > >> We've kept these around because we do still have accounts on sf.net > >> and java.net because ofbiz was previously hosted on both of them. > > > > The java.net one doesn't link anywhere specific. Were it me, I think > > I would eliminate it just to reduce clutter. The SF one in > > particular, though, links to the project, which might lead some people > > astray... > > > >> Is there any policy about removing such things, ie either the logos/ > >> links or the actual projects? It might be a good idea to clean up > >> these old accounts, ie get rid of them... > > > > I don't think they're really a problem - I'd just put prominent links > > on both to the current location of OFBiz, and perhaps shut down those > > portions of their services that they allow you to. > > > > -- > > David N. Welton > > - http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/ > > > > Linux, Open Source Consulting > > - http://www.dedasys.com/ |
In reply to this post by David E Jones-2
> I updated the web site pages to remove the header links and just
> include side bar links on the home page and make it clear that they > are old listings. Hopefully now if anyone finds OFBiz through sf.net > or java.net it will push them to the ASF ofbiz site, and for now the > incubator status page as well. What with 200-some (*) odd links on the front page, were it me, I think I would just erase them entirely. -- David N. Welton - http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/ Linux, Open Source Consulting - http://www.dedasys.com/ (*) davidw@salem:/tmp$ grep -c href index.html 223 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |