weird behavior in reply lately

[adityasharma]

Here is the Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18768

Thanks and regards,
Aditya Sharma

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 5:39 PM Aditya Sharma <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> I went through the post shared by Mathieu, Jacques along with this post[1]
> that shows both the sides vividly and it all makes sense.
> Different people may have different preferences for it but we have to
> choose what favors the community.
> I can see many instances on lists where users replied to the personal
> email and we cannot really restrict anyone to use reply or reply-all.
> I will create a Jira at infra so that previous arrangement is restored.
>
> 1. https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Aditya Sharma
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 8:23 PM Jacques Le Roux <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Le 30/06/2019 à 16:08, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
>> > Hello Jacques
>> >
>> > Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> writes:
>> >
>> >> The question is should we vote?
>> >>
>> >> So far it all depends on me and my -0.2 added to Paul's -0.8 after
>> >> Mathieu convinced me that it would be better do to otherwise.
>> >>
>> >> If Mathieu does not want to use his veto, I'll not apply mine. It was
>> >> like that for years and it seems everybody was happy, including
>> >> Mathieu, Paul and I, we never complained.
>> > I am not familiar with Apache voting policies, However according to [1]
>> > it seems that people are not expected to use their veto for procedural
>> > issues.
>> >
>> > Most people in this conversation have already expressed their opinion in
>> > favour of the ‘reply-to’ munging and have not been convinced by my
>> > arguments, so I don't think we need to formally vote.
>> >
>> > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>
>> That's simpler indeed. We could argue that it's code and a vote could be
>> done. But it's not OFBiz code so I I guess it would be far fetched and most
>> would not agree.
>>
>> Anyway, I'll continue to use Reply-to-list, and we will not receive
>> unwanted copies, it's OK with me.
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Thanks Aditya,

Jacques

Le 18/07/2019 à 14:59, Aditya Sharma a écrit :

> Here is the Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18768
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Aditya Sharma
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 5:39 PM Aditya Sharma <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> I went through the post shared by Mathieu, Jacques along with this post[1]
>> that shows both the sides vividly and it all makes sense.
>> Different people may have different preferences for it but we have to
>> choose what favors the community.
>> I can see many instances on lists where users replied to the personal
>> email and we cannot really restrict anyone to use reply or reply-all.
>> I will create a Jira at infra so that previous arrangement is restored.
>>
>> 1. https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Aditya Sharma
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 8:23 PM Jacques Le Roux <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Le 30/06/2019 à 16:08, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
>>>> Hello Jacques
>>>>
>>>> Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> The question is should we vote?
>>>>>
>>>>> So far it all depends on me and my -0.2 added to Paul's -0.8 after
>>>>> Mathieu convinced me that it would be better do to otherwise.
>>>>>
>>>>> If Mathieu does not want to use his veto, I'll not apply mine. It was
>>>>> like that for years and it seems everybody was happy, including
>>>>> Mathieu, Paul and I, we never complained.
>>>> I am not familiar with Apache voting policies, However according to [1]
>>>> it seems that people are not expected to use their veto for procedural
>>>> issues.
>>>>
>>>> Most people in this conversation have already expressed their opinion in
>>>> favour of the ‘reply-to’ munging and have not been convinced by my
>>>> arguments, so I don't think we need to formally vote.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>> That's simpler indeed. We could argue that it's code and a vote could be
>>> done. But it's not OFBiz code so I I guess it would be far fetched and most
>>> would not agree.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I'll continue to use Reply-to-list, and we will not receive
>>> unwanted copies, it's OK with me.
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>

[taher]

Awesome, it works again. Very cool.

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019, 10:13 PM Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Thanks Aditya,
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 18/07/2019 à 14:59, Aditya Sharma a écrit :
> > Here is the Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18768
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Aditya Sharma
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 5:39 PM Aditya Sharma <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I went through the post shared by Mathieu, Jacques along with this
> post[1]
> >> that shows both the sides vividly and it all makes sense.
> >> Different people may have different preferences for it but we have to
> >> choose what favors the community.
> >> I can see many instances on lists where users replied to the personal
> >> email and we cannot really restrict anyone to use reply or reply-all.
> >> I will create a Jira at infra so that previous arrangement is restored.
> >>
> >> 1. https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html
> >>
> >> Thanks and regards,
> >> Aditya Sharma
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 8:23 PM Jacques Le Roux <
> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Le 30/06/2019 à 16:08, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
> >>>> Hello Jacques
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> writes:
> >>>>
> >>>>> The question is should we vote?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So far it all depends on me and my -0.2 added to Paul's -0.8 after
> >>>>> Mathieu convinced me that it would be better do to otherwise.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If Mathieu does not want to use his veto, I'll not apply mine. It was
> >>>>> like that for years and it seems everybody was happy, including
> >>>>> Mathieu, Paul and I, we never complained.
> >>>> I am not familiar with Apache voting policies, However according to
> [1]
> >>>> it seems that people are not expected to use their veto for procedural
> >>>> issues.
> >>>>
> >>>> Most people in this conversation have already expressed their opinion
> in
> >>>> favour of the ‘reply-to’ munging and have not been convinced by my
> >>>> arguments, so I don't think we need to formally vote.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >>> That's simpler indeed. We could argue that it's code and a vote could
> be
> >>> done. But it's not OFBiz code so I I guess it would be far fetched and
> most
> >>> would not agree.
> >>>
> >>> Anyway, I'll continue to use Reply-to-list, and we will not receive
> >>> unwanted copies, it's OK with me.
> >>>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>>
>