ASF Board Report for March 2007

[David E Jones]

The initial draft of the board report is available here:

http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/XgU

I'll probably send this off in the morning tomorrow (ie a few hours  
from now). If anyone has any feedback to express or wants to express  
support (+1) or opposition (-1) to this, please do.

There isn't a whole lot to report this month, or it doesn't seem that  
way. If I'm forgetting anything important, please let me know!

-David

[Scott Gray]

+1
-Scott

On 19/03/07, David E. Jones <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
> The initial draft of the board report is available here:
>
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/XgU
>
> I'll probably send this off in the morning tomorrow (ie a few hours
> from now). If anyone has any feedback to express or wants to express
> support (+1) or opposition (-1) to this, please do.
>
> There isn't a whole lot to report this month, or it doesn't seem that
> way. If I'm forgetting anything important, please let me know!
>
> -David
>
>
>

[Jacopo Cappellato]

+1

David E. Jones wrote:

>
> The initial draft of the board report is available here:
>
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/XgU
>
> I'll probably send this off in the morning tomorrow (ie a few hours from
> now). If anyone has any feedback to express or wants to express support
> (+1) or opposition (-1) to this, please do.
>
> There isn't a whole lot to report this month, or it doesn't seem that
> way. If I'm forgetting anything important, please let me know!
>
> -David
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

+1

Jacques

----- Message d'origine -----
De : "David E. Jones" <[hidden email]>
À : <[hidden email]>
Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 06:11
Objet : ASF Board Report for March 2007

>
> The initial draft of the board report is available here:
>
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/XgU
>
> I'll probably send this off in the morning tomorrow (ie a few hours
> from now). If anyone has any feedback to express or wants to express
> support (+1) or opposition (-1) to this, please do.
>
> There isn't a whole lot to report this month, or it doesn't seem that
> way. If I'm forgetting anything important, please let me know!
>
> -David
>
>

[Tim Ruppert]

+1

Tim

On Mar 19, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

+1

Jacques

----- Message d'origine ----- 

De : "David E. Jones" <[hidden email]>

À : <[hidden email]>

Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 06:11

Objet : ASF Board Report for March 2007

The initial draft of the board report is available here:

http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/XgU

I'll probably send this off in the morning tomorrow (ie a few hours

from now). If anyone has any feedback to express or wants to express

support (+1) or opposition (-1) to this, please do.

There isn't a whole lot to report this month, or it doesn't seem that

way. If I'm forgetting anything important, please let me know!

-David

[Walter Vaughan]

David E. Jones wrote:

> The initial draft of the board report is available here:
>
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/XgU

As an adjunct to that and as someone looking forward to a stable release, is the
  naming convention for the release mentioned in the report put to bed?

<opening can of worms>
Will it be
       Apache OFBiz 4.0
       Apache OFBiz 7.04
       Apache OFBiz 4_STABLE
       Apache OFBiz 4_RELEASE
</opening can of worms>

Coming from a OS (FreeBSD) that has development that works identical to this
project (continual, not completely dependent upon upstream
engineering/packaging), I like the _RELEASE style naming convention. I'd even
suggest we have some sort of patch nomenclature, so that all the security
patches applied to the release version be visible from a running instance, and
be [ documented | easy linked from the home page] as to what is fixed for each
patch.

Okay this is getting long.

Does this need to be a jira issue?

--
Walter