Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1775 posts
|
The initial draft of the board report is available here: http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/XgU I'll probably send this off in the morning tomorrow (ie a few hours from now). If anyone has any feedback to express or wants to express support (+1) or opposition (-1) to this, please do. There isn't a whole lot to report this month, or it doesn't seem that way. If I'm forgetting anything important, please let me know! -David |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
986 posts
|
+1
-Scott On 19/03/07, David E. Jones <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > The initial draft of the board report is available here: > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/XgU > > I'll probably send this off in the morning tomorrow (ie a few hours > from now). If anyone has any feedback to express or wants to express > support (+1) or opposition (-1) to this, please do. > > There isn't a whole lot to report this month, or it doesn't seem that > way. If I'm forgetting anything important, please let me know! > > -David > > > ... [show rest of quote]
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1743 posts
|
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1
David E. Jones wrote: > > The initial draft of the board report is available here: > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/XgU > > I'll probably send this off in the morning tomorrow (ie a few hours from > now). If anyone has any feedback to express or wants to express support > (+1) or opposition (-1) to this, please do. > > There isn't a whole lot to report this month, or it doesn't seem that > way. If I'm forgetting anything important, please let me know! > > -David > |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
17869 posts
|
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1
Jacques ----- Message d'origine ----- De : "David E. Jones" <[hidden email]> À : <[hidden email]> Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 06:11 Objet : ASF Board Report for March 2007 > > The initial draft of the board report is available here: > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/XgU > > I'll probably send this off in the morning tomorrow (ie a few hours > from now). If anyone has any feedback to express or wants to express > support (+1) or opposition (-1) to this, please do. > > There isn't a whole lot to report this month, or it doesn't seem that > way. If I'm forgetting anything important, please let me know! > > -David > > ... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1151 posts
|
+1
On Mar 19, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
245 posts
|
In reply to this post by David E Jones
David E. Jones wrote:
> The initial draft of the board report is available here: > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/XgU As an adjunct to that and as someone looking forward to a stable release, is the naming convention for the release mentioned in the report put to bed? <opening can of worms> Will it be Apache OFBiz 4.0 Apache OFBiz 7.04 Apache OFBiz 4_STABLE Apache OFBiz 4_RELEASE </opening can of worms> Coming from a OS (FreeBSD) that has development that works identical to this project (continual, not completely dependent upon upstream engineering/packaging), I like the _RELEASE style naming convention. I'd even suggest we have some sort of patch nomenclature, so that all the security patches applied to the release version be visible from a running instance, and be [ documented | easy linked from the home page] as to what is fixed for each patch. Okay this is getting long. Does this need to be a jira issue? -- Walter |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |