Automated routing to fixed machine assets

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Automated routing to fixed machine assets

Toddnick
Hello Everyone,
I would like to automatically assign fixed assets (machine tools on a
production line) to production runs. The way ofbiz seems to be setup
requires that someone manually assign everything that gets made through the
system.

/manufacturing/control/ProductionRunFixedAssets?productionRunId=10695

Both I and a colleague have looked through the docs and there isnt an
obvious way to do this.
Is there anyway to automatically assign fixed assets to production runs? Is
there a better way to handle this?

Many thanks for your input

--
Todd Burdeinei
Web Developer
Burdeinei Corp
702-259-3273 office / fax number
702-372-9920 cell
[hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Automated routing to fixed machine assets

BJ Freeman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ofbiz has provided the framework for this. It would be up to a developer
to add this functionality.
you can use web tools to import routing info like was done for 10695
if you want to contribute back to the community:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Contributors+Best+Practices
and a tutorial
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Beginner%27s+Development+Guide+Using+Practice+Application

Todd Burdeinei sent the following on 12/23/2008 11:02 AM:

> Hello Everyone,
> I would like to automatically assign fixed assets (machine tools on a
> production line) to production runs. The way ofbiz seems to be setup
> requires that someone manually assign everything that gets made through the
> system.
>
> /manufacturing/control/ProductionRunFixedAssets?productionRunId=10695
>
> Both I and a colleague have looked through the docs and there isnt an
> obvious way to do this.
> Is there anyway to automatically assign fixed assets to production runs? Is
> there a better way to handle this?
>
> Many thanks for your input
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJUU58rP3NbaWWqE4RAkZyAJ41CUYrCNWXlkohFRvRT0ON5TVqQwCeLXdg
EO8sod9X7H0oRFahJ0JxUK0=
=eH3v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----