Backport Mini-language Overhaul To Release 12 Branch

[Adrian Crum-3]

This subject has been mentioned in other threads, but I'm making it a
separate thread so everyone has a chance to comment.

I would like to backport the Mini-language overhaul in its entirety to
the Release 12 branch. The overhaul contains some new features (<break>,
<continue>, <trace> elements, and element validation), but most of the
work was bug fixes (the model classes were not thread-safe, many bits of
code did not work). So, the backport is not purely a bug fix. Separating
the code so that only bug fixes are backported would be difficult -
because the overhaul represents 6 MB of changes.

I have backported the overhaul to Release 12 on my local machine and
everything works fine. If there are no objections in the next few days,
I would like to commit those changes.

-Adrian

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

+1

On Jul 8, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:

> This subject has been mentioned in other threads, but I'm making it a separate thread so everyone has a chance to comment.
>
> I would like to backport the Mini-language overhaul in its entirety to the Release 12 branch. The overhaul contains some new features (<break>, <continue>, <trace> elements, and element validation), but most of the work was bug fixes (the model classes were not thread-safe, many bits of code did not work). So, the backport is not purely a bug fix. Separating the code so that only bug fixes are backported would be difficult - because the overhaul represents 6 MB of changes.
>
> I have backported the overhaul to Release 12 on my local machine and everything works fine. If there are no objections in the next few days, I would like to commit those changes.
>
> -Adrian
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

+1, continuing to backport in R12.04 from trunk in case of Minilang bug fixes, of course (to everybody)

Jacques

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>

> +1
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
>> This subject has been mentioned in other threads, but I'm making it a separate thread so everyone has a chance to comment.
>>
>> I would like to backport the Mini-language overhaul in its entirety to the Release 12 branch. The overhaul contains some new
>> features (<break>, <continue>, <trace> elements, and element validation), but most of the work was bug fixes (the model classes
>> were not thread-safe, many bits of code did not work). So, the backport is not purely a bug fix. Separating the code so that only
>> bug fixes are backported would be difficult - because the overhaul represents 6 MB of changes.
>>
>> I have backported the overhaul to Release 12 on my local machine and everything works fine. If there are no objections in the
>> next few days, I would like to commit those changes.
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>
>

[Anil Patel-3]

+1

Anil Patel



On Jul 8, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Adrian Crum <[hidden email]> wrote:

> This subject has been mentioned in other threads, but I'm making it a separate thread so everyone has a chance to comment.
>
> I would like to backport the Mini-language overhaul in its entirety to the Release 12 branch. The overhaul contains some new features (<break>, <continue>, <trace> elements, and element validation), but most of the work was bug fixes (the model classes were not thread-safe, many bits of code did not work). So, the backport is not purely a bug fix. Separating the code so that only bug fixes are backported would be difficult - because the overhaul represents 6 MB of changes.
>
> I have backported the overhaul to Release 12 on my local machine and everything works fine. If there are no objections in the next few days, I would like to commit those changes.
>
> -Adrian
>

[Erwan de FERRIERES]

+1

Le 08/07/2012 12:25, Adrian Crum a écrit :

> This subject has been mentioned in other threads, but I'm making it a
> separate thread so everyone has a chance to comment.
>
> I would like to backport the Mini-language overhaul in its entirety to
> the Release 12 branch. The overhaul contains some new features (<break>,
> <continue>, <trace> elements, and element validation), but most of the
> work was bug fixes (the model classes were not thread-safe, many bits of
> code did not work). So, the backport is not purely a bug fix. Separating
> the code so that only bug fixes are backported would be difficult -
> because the overhaul represents 6 MB of changes.
>
> I have backported the overhaul to Release 12 on my local machine and
> everything works fine. If there are no objections in the next few days,
> I would like to commit those changes.
>
> -Adrian
>
>

--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz

[Ashish Vijaywargiya]

+1

--
Ashish

On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adrian Crum <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> This subject has been mentioned in other threads, but I'm making it a
> separate thread so everyone has a chance to comment.
>
> I would like to backport the Mini-language overhaul in its entirety to the
> Release 12 branch. The overhaul contains some new features (<break>,
> <continue>, <trace> elements, and element validation), but most of the work
> was bug fixes (the model classes were not thread-safe, many bits of code
> did not work). So, the backport is not purely a bug fix. Separating the
> code so that only bug fixes are backported would be difficult - because the
> overhaul represents 6 MB of changes.
>
> I have backported the overhaul to Release 12 on my local machine and
> everything works fine. If there are no objections in the next few days, I
> would like to commit those changes.
>
> -Adrian
>
>

[Tim Ruppert-2]

+1

Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
c:801.557.5695

On Jul 8, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:

> This subject has been mentioned in other threads, but I'm making it a separate thread so everyone has a chance to comment.
>
> I would like to backport the Mini-language overhaul in its entirety to the Release 12 branch. The overhaul contains some new features (<break>, <continue>, <trace> elements, and element validation), but most of the work was bug fixes (the model classes were not thread-safe, many bits of code did not work). So, the backport is not purely a bug fix. Separating the code so that only bug fixes are backported would be difficult - because the overhaul represents 6 MB of changes.
>
> I have backported the overhaul to Release 12 on my local machine and everything works fine. If there are no objections in the next few days, I would like to commit those changes.
>
> -Adrian
>

[Pierre Smits]

+1

2012/7/8 Tim Ruppert <[hidden email]>

> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Ruppert
> --
> Tim Ruppert
>
> o:801.649.6594
> f:801.649.6595
> c:801.557.5695
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
> > This subject has been mentioned in other threads, but I'm making it a
> separate thread so everyone has a chance to comment.
> >
> > I would like to backport the Mini-language overhaul in its entirety to
> the Release 12 branch. The overhaul contains some new features (<break>,
> <continue>, <trace> elements, and element validation), but most of the work
> was bug fixes (the model classes were not thread-safe, many bits of code
> did not work). So, the backport is not purely a bug fix. Separating the
> code so that only bug fixes are backported would be difficult - because the
> overhaul represents 6 MB of changes.
> >
> > I have backported the overhaul to Release 12 on my local machine and
> everything works fine. If there are no objections in the next few days, I
> would like to commit those changes.
> >
> > -Adrian
> >
>
>