Cleaning of accounting artifacts

Hi to all,

looking into artifact info logs I discover some requests that refers  
some views that are no more existing.
Someone of you knows if I can remove the following requests ?

ListFixedAssetParties
EditFixedAssetParties
addPartyToFixedAsset
updatePartyToFixedAsset
removePartyFromFixedAsset

ListFixedAssetRollUp
EditFixedAssetRollup
updateFixedAssetToFixedAsset
removeFixedAssetFromFixedAsset

Thanks
Marco

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi Marco,

From: <[hidden email]>
> Hi to all,
>
> looking into artifact info logs I discover some requests that refers  
> some views that are no more existing.

Maybe they are not already existing (subsequent work waiting) ?
Maybe, as there is a doubt,  we could comment then and mark them to be fixed/removed later, putting a deadline ?
As you did for instance for ListCommCustRequests in r701766
This also is thru for your commits 701763 to 701767 as well

My 2 cts

Jacques

> Someone of you knows if I can remove the following requests ?
>
> ListFixedAssetParties
> EditFixedAssetParties
> addPartyToFixedAsset
> updatePartyToFixedAsset
> removePartyFromFixedAsset
>
> ListFixedAssetRollUp
> EditFixedAssetRollup
> updateFixedAssetToFixedAsset
> removeFixedAssetFromFixedAsset
>
> Thanks
> Marco

Yes, I have declared those old request/view as "TO BE REMOVED".

Thanks
Marco

Il giorno 05/ott/08, alle ore 14:07, Jacques Le Roux ha scritto:

> Hi Marco,
>
> From: <[hidden email]>
>> Hi to all,
>> looking into artifact info logs I discover some requests that  
>> refers  some views that are no more existing.
>
> Maybe they are not already existing (subsequent work waiting) ?
> Maybe, as there is a doubt,  we could comment then and mark them to  
> be fixed/removed later, putting a deadline ?
> As you did for instance for ListCommCustRequests in r701766
> This also is thru for your commits 701763 to 701767 as well
>
> My 2 cts
>
> Jacques
>
>> Someone of you knows if I can remove the following requests ?
>> ListFixedAssetParties
>> EditFixedAssetParties
>> addPartyToFixedAsset
>> updatePartyToFixedAsset
>> removePartyFromFixedAsset
>> ListFixedAssetRollUp
>> EditFixedAssetRollup
>> updateFixedAssetToFixedAsset
>> removeFixedAssetFromFixedAsset
>> Thanks
>> Marco

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi everybody,

In the same kind of effort, I wonder if we need some "Main" menus which are redundant as they actually go to another page (with
another name in the app. menu) wich is the real main page.
On the other hand if we prefer to keep the "Main"' concept (this because in the future we may need a real "Main" page), then all
applications should have one. Even if it go to another page.
Let me know if you need examples (but I guess it's obvious)

Jacques

From: <[hidden email]>

> Yes, I have declared those old request/view as "TO BE REMOVED".
>
> Thanks
> Marco
>
> Il giorno 05/ott/08, alle ore 14:07, Jacques Le Roux ha scritto:
>
>> Hi Marco,
>>
>> From: <[hidden email]>
>>> Hi to all,
>>> looking into artifact info logs I discover some requests that  refers  some views that are no more existing.
>>
>> Maybe they are not already existing (subsequent work waiting) ?
>> Maybe, as there is a doubt,  we could comment then and mark them to  be fixed/removed later, putting a deadline ?
>> As you did for instance for ListCommCustRequests in r701766
>> This also is thru for your commits 701763 to 701767 as well
>>
>> My 2 cts
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>> Someone of you knows if I can remove the following requests ?
>>> ListFixedAssetParties
>>> EditFixedAssetParties
>>> addPartyToFixedAsset
>>> updatePartyToFixedAsset
>>> removePartyFromFixedAsset
>>> ListFixedAssetRollUp
>>> EditFixedAssetRollup
>>> updateFixedAssetToFixedAsset
>>> removeFixedAssetFromFixedAsset
>>> Thanks
>>> Marco
>

[BJ Freeman]

Ive adopted a Main as it goes to page that explains all the functions
shown in the menu(s), including the sub menu under the menu.

Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> In the same kind of effort, I wonder if we need some "Main" menus which
> are redundant as they actually go to another page (with another name in
> the app. menu) wich is the real main page.
> On the other hand if we prefer to keep the "Main"' concept (this because
> in the future we may need a real "Main" page), then all applications
> should have one. Even if it go to another page.
> Let me know if you need examples (but I guess it's obvious)
>
> Jacques
>
> From: <[hidden email]>
>> Yes, I have declared those old request/view as "TO BE REMOVED".
>>
>> Thanks
>> Marco
>>
>> Il giorno 05/ott/08, alle ore 14:07, Jacques Le Roux ha scritto:
>>
>>> Hi Marco,
>>>
>>> From: <[hidden email]>
>>>> Hi to all,
>>>> looking into artifact info logs I discover some requests that  
>>>> refers  some views that are no more existing.
>>>
>>> Maybe they are not already existing (subsequent work waiting) ?
>>> Maybe, as there is a doubt,  we could comment then and mark them to  
>>> be fixed/removed later, putting a deadline ?
>>> As you did for instance for ListCommCustRequests in r701766
>>> This also is thru for your commits 701763 to 701767 as well
>>>
>>> My 2 cts
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>> Someone of you knows if I can remove the following requests ?
>>>> ListFixedAssetParties
>>>> EditFixedAssetParties
>>>> addPartyToFixedAsset
>>>> updatePartyToFixedAsset
>>>> removePartyFromFixedAsset
>>>> ListFixedAssetRollUp
>>>> EditFixedAssetRollup
>>>> updateFixedAssetToFixedAsset
>>>> removeFixedAssetFromFixedAsset
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Marco
>>
>
>
>