Code quality
Locked
 
Administrator
|
It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit error.log on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to report them.
Jacques |
|
This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all that well for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and have automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how we'd go about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on the way, I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and put something rudimentary in place.
Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: > It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit error.log > on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to report them. > > Jacques |
|
Administrator
|
I suggest to have a look at http://logging.apache.org/chainsaw/index.html but I did not look into details yet. There are maybe
better solutions... Jacques From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all that well for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and have > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how we'd go about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on the way, > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and put something rudimentary in place. > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit error.log >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to report them. >> >> Jacques > |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tim Ruppert
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Possible have a script that copies the days error.log to a common place that can be download by those interested. create a static page with link or just an open folder. Tim Ruppert sent the following on 4/5/2009 12:00 PM: > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all that well for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and have automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how we'd go about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on the way, I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and put something rudimentary in place. > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit error.log >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to report them. >> >> Jacques > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ2SUcrP3NbaWWqE4RAqtbAJ9WJCeYxV6mnzzWT6IxIqBmryXDZwCdEoF+ fllpgxVXasflNqfT9rJTaAg= =Er3G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tim Ruppert
The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a little setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all ERROR and FATAL level messages. Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really wanted people to get on these then having them go to the dev list would do the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even hundreds a day. -David On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all that well > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and have > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how we'd go > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on the way, > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and put > something rudimentary in place. > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit error.log >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to report them. >> >> Jacques |
|
|
Could we create another mailing list for these types of things that people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? Something like [hidden email]? I imagine that the errors will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - but it could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous days log file available to people who want to scan it as well.
I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very thing at the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs - will loop you in David. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> wrote: > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a little > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all ERROR and > FATAL level messages. > > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really wanted > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list would do > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even hundreds > > a day. > > -David > > > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all that well > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and have > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how we'd go > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on the way, > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and put > > something rudimentary in place. > > > > Cheers, > > Tim > > -- > > Tim Ruppert > > HotWax Media > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > > > o:801.649.6594 > > f:801.649.6595 > > > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit > error.log > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to report them. > >> > >> Jacques |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available for viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send them to a place where we can pluck them off.
Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's keep chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the next day makes good sense to me. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Could we create another mailing list for these types of things that > people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? > Something like [hidden email]? I imagine that the errors > will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - but it > could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous days > log file available to people who want to scan it as well. > > I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very thing at > the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs - will > loop you in David. > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a little > > > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all ERROR and > > FATAL level messages. > > > > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really wanted > > > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list would do > > > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even > hundreds > > > > a day. > > > > -David > > > > > > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > > > > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all that well > > > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and have > > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how we'd go > > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on the way, > > > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and put > > > > something rudimentary in place. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Tim > > > -- > > > Tim Ruppert > > > HotWax Media > > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > > > > > o:801.649.6594 > > > f:801.649.6595 > > > > > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit > > error.log > > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to report > them. > > >> > > >> Jacques |
|
Administrator
|
I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull.
Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix experience Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. There are also MindTree Insight http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we need a such tools for now... Jacques From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do >build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available for >viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send >them to a place where we can pluck them off. > > Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's keep chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the next > day makes good sense to me. > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things that >> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? >> Something like [hidden email]? I imagine that the errors >> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - but it >> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous days >> log file available to people who want to scan it as well. >> >> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very thing at >> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs - will >> loop you in David. >> >> Cheers, >> Tim >> -- >> Tim Ruppert >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> o:801.649.6594 >> f:801.649.6595 >> >> ----- "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a little >> >> > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all ERROR and >> > FATAL level messages. >> > >> > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really wanted >> >> > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list would do >> >> > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even >> hundreds >> > >> > a day. >> > >> > -David >> > >> > >> > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >> > >> > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all that well >> >> > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and have >> > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how we'd go >> > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on the way, >> >> > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and put >> >> > > something rudimentary in place. >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Tim >> > > -- >> > > Tim Ruppert >> > > HotWax Media >> > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> > > >> > > o:801.649.6594 >> > > f:801.649.6595 >> > > >> > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit >> > error.log >> > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to report >> them. >> > >> >> > >> Jacques > |
|
|
Hello,
Please take a look on the following link. http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger To me details can be of some help for us. -- Ashish Vijaywargiya Jacques Le Roux wrote: > I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull. > Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix experience > Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. > There are also MindTree Insight > http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 > and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we need a > such tools for now... > > Jacques > > From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >> I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day >> available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do >> build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like >> logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available for >> viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the >> route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send >> them to a place where we can pluck them off. >> >> Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's keep >> chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the next >> day makes good sense to me. >> >> Cheers, >> Tim >> -- >> Tim Ruppert >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> o:801.649.6594 >> f:801.649.6595 >> >> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things that >>> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? >>> Something like [hidden email]? I imagine that the errors >>> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - but it >>> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous days >>> log file available to people who want to scan it as well. >>> >>> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very thing at >>> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs - will >>> loop you in David. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tim >>> -- >>> Tim Ruppert >>> HotWax Media >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> >>> o:801.649.6594 >>> f:801.649.6595 >>> >>> ----- "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a little >>> >>> > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all ERROR and >>> > FATAL level messages. >>> > >>> > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really wanted >>> >>> > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list would do >>> >>> > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even >>> hundreds >>> > >>> > a day. >>> > >>> > -David >>> > >>> > >>> > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >>> > >>> > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all that well >>> >>> > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and have >>> > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how we'd go >>> > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on the way, >>> >>> > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and put >>> >>> > > something rudimentary in place. >>> > > >>> > > Cheers, >>> > > Tim >>> > > -- >>> > > Tim Ruppert >>> > > HotWax Media >>> > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> > > >>> > > o:801.649.6594 >>> > > f:801.649.6595 >>> > > >>> > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit >>> > error.log >>> > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to report >>> them. >>> > >> >>> > >> Jacques >> > > |
smime.p7s (4K) |
Administrator
|
Hi Ashish,
I'm more looking for errors generated after build, by users online. But yes, these ones colud be interesting too... Jacques From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> > Hello, > > Please take a look on the following link. > http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger > > To me details can be of some help for us. > > -- > Ashish Vijaywargiya > > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull. >> Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix experience >> Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. >> There are also MindTree Insight >> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 >> and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we need a >> such tools for now... >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>> I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day >>> available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do >>> build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like >>> logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available for >>> viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the >>> route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send >>> them to a place where we can pluck them off. >>> >>> Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's keep >>> chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the next >>> day makes good sense to me. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tim >>> -- >>> Tim Ruppert >>> HotWax Media >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> >>> o:801.649.6594 >>> f:801.649.6595 >>> >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things that >>>> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? >>>> Something like [hidden email]? I imagine that the errors >>>> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - but it >>>> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous days >>>> log file available to people who want to scan it as well. >>>> >>>> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very thing at >>>> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs - will >>>> loop you in David. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Tim >>>> -- >>>> Tim Ruppert >>>> HotWax Media >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> >>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>> >>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a little >>>> >>>> > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all ERROR and >>>> > FATAL level messages. >>>> > >>>> > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really wanted >>>> >>>> > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list would do >>>> >>>> > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even >>>> hundreds >>>> > >>>> > a day. >>>> > >>>> > -David >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all that well >>>> >>>> > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and have >>>> > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how we'd go >>>> > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on the way, >>>> >>>> > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and put >>>> >>>> > > something rudimentary in place. >>>> > > >>>> > > Cheers, >>>> > > Tim >>>> > > -- >>>> > > Tim Ruppert >>>> > > HotWax Media >>>> > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> > > >>>> > > o:801.649.6594 >>>> > > f:801.649.6595 >>>> > > >>>> > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit >>>> > error.log >>>> > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to report >>>> them. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Jacques >>> >> >> > |
|
|
I've got everything in place to have log files available to the community. Will be trying to release it officially tomorrow.
Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Ashish, > > I'm more looking for errors generated after build, by users online. > But yes, these ones colud be interesting too... > > Jacques > > From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> > > Hello, > > > > Please take a look on the following link. > > http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger > > > > To me details can be of some help for us. > > > > -- > > Ashish Vijaywargiya > > > > > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull. > >> Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix experience > > >> Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. > >> There are also MindTree Insight > >> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 > >> and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we > need a > >> such tools for now... > >> > >> Jacques > >> > >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> > >>> I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day > >>> available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do > >>> build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like > >>> logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available for > >>> viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the > >>> route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send > >>> them to a place where we can pluck them off. > >>> > >>> Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's keep > > >>> chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the next > >>> day makes good sense to me. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Tim > >>> -- > >>> Tim Ruppert > >>> HotWax Media > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>> > >>> o:801.649.6594 > >>> f:801.649.6595 > >>> > >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things > that > >>>> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? > >>>> Something like [hidden email]? I imagine that the > errors > >>>> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - but > it > >>>> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous > days > >>>> log file available to people who want to scan it as well. > >>>> > >>>> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very thing > at > >>>> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs - > will > >>>> loop you in David. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Tim > >>>> -- > >>>> Tim Ruppert > >>>> HotWax Media > >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>> > >>>> o:801.649.6594 > >>>> f:801.649.6595 > >>>> > >>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a > little > >>>> > >>>> > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all ERROR > and > >>>> > FATAL level messages. > >>>> > > >>>> > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really > wanted > >>>> > >>>> > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list > would do > >>>> > >>>> > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even > >>>> hundreds > >>>> > > >>>> > a day. > >>>> > > >>>> > -David > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all that > well > >>>> > >>>> > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and > have > >>>> > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how we'd > go > >>>> > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on the > way, > >>>> > >>>> > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and > put > >>>> > >>>> > > something rudimentary in place. > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Cheers, > >>>> > > Tim > >>>> > > -- > >>>> > > Tim Ruppert > >>>> > > HotWax Media > >>>> > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>> > > > >>>> > > o:801.649.6594 > >>>> > > f:801.649.6595 > >>>> > > > >>>> > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >>>> > > > >>>> > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit > >>>> > error.log > >>>> > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to > report > >>>> them. > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> Jacques > >>> > >> > >> > > |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
http://log.ofbiz.org should have the previous days demo logs all zipped up in case there are multiple files. Please keep checking it out as it's still in BETA :)
Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: > I've got everything in place to have log files available to the > community. Will be trying to release it officially tomorrow. > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi Ashish, > > > > I'm more looking for errors generated after build, by users online. > > But yes, these ones colud be interesting too... > > > > Jacques > > > > From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> > > > Hello, > > > > > > Please take a look on the following link. > > > http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger > > > > > > To me details can be of some help for us. > > > > > > -- > > > Ashish Vijaywargiya > > > > > > > > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > >> I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull. > > >> Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix > experience > > > > >> Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. > > >> There are also MindTree Insight > > >> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 > > >> and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we > > need a > > >> such tools for now... > > >> > > >> Jacques > > >> > > >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> > > >>> I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day > > >>> available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do > > >>> build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like > > >>> logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available > for > > >>> viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the > > > >>> route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send > > >>> them to a place where we can pluck them off. > > >>> > > >>> Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's > keep > > > > >>> chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the > next > > >>> day makes good sense to me. > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> Tim > > >>> -- > > >>> Tim Ruppert > > >>> HotWax Media > > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > >>> > > >>> o:801.649.6594 > > >>> f:801.649.6595 > > >>> > > >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things > > that > > >>>> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? > > >>>> Something like [hidden email]? I imagine that the > > errors > > >>>> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - > but > > it > > >>>> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous > > days > > >>>> log file available to people who want to scan it as well. > > >>>> > > >>>> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very > thing > > at > > >>>> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs > - > > will > > >>>> loop you in David. > > >>>> > > >>>> Cheers, > > >>>> Tim > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Tim Ruppert > > >>>> HotWax Media > > >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > >>>> > > >>>> o:801.649.6594 > > >>>> f:801.649.6595 > > >>>> > > >>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a > > little > > >>>> > > >>>> > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all > ERROR > > and > > >>>> > FATAL level messages. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really > > wanted > > >>>> > > >>>> > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list > > would do > > >>>> > > >>>> > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even > > >>>> hundreds > > >>>> > > > >>>> > a day. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > -David > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all > that > > well > > >>>> > > >>>> > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and > > have > > >>>> > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how > we'd > > go > > >>>> > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on > the > > way, > > >>>> > > >>>> > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try > and > > put > > >>>> > > >>>> > > something rudimentary in place. > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > Cheers, > > >>>> > > Tim > > >>>> > > -- > > >>>> > > Tim Ruppert > > >>>> > > HotWax Media > > >>>> > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > o:801.649.6594 > > >>>> > > f:801.649.6595 > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should > exploit > > >>>> > error.log > > >>>> > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to > > report > > >>>> them. > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> Jacques > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 thanks. Tim Ruppert sent the following on 4/8/2009 9:33 AM: > http://log.ofbiz.org should have the previous days demo logs all zipped up in case there are multiple files. Please keep checking it out as it's still in BETA :) > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I've got everything in place to have log files available to the >> community. Will be trying to release it officially tomorrow. >> >> Cheers, >> Tim >> -- >> Tim Ruppert >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> o:801.649.6594 >> f:801.649.6595 >> >> ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ashish, >>> >>> I'm more looking for errors generated after build, by users online. >>> But yes, these ones colud be interesting too... >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Please take a look on the following link. >>>> http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger >>>> >>>> To me details can be of some help for us. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ashish Vijaywargiya >>>> >>>> >>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>> I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull. >>>>> Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix >> experience >>>>> Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. >>>>> There are also MindTree Insight >>>>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 >>>>> and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we >>> need a >>>>> such tools for now... >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>>>> I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day >>>>>> available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do >>>>>> build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like >>>>>> logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available >> for >>>>>> viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the >>>>>> route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send >>>>>> them to a place where we can pluck them off. >>>>>> >>>>>> Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's >> keep >>>>>> chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the >> next >>>>>> day makes good sense to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>> >>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things >>> that >>>>>>> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? >>>>>>> Something like [hidden email]? I imagine that the >>> errors >>>>>>> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - >> but >>> it >>>>>>> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous >>> days >>>>>>> log file available to people who want to scan it as well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very >> thing >>> at >>>>>>> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs >> - >>> will >>>>>>> loop you in David. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a >>> little >>>>>>>> setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all >> ERROR >>> and >>>>>>>> FATAL level messages. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really >>> wanted >>>>>>>> people to get on these then having them go to the dev list >>> would do >>>>>>>> the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even >>>>>>> hundreds >>>>>>>> a day. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -David >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all >> that >>> well >>>>>>>>> for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and >>> have >>>>>>>>> automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how >> we'd >>> go >>>>>>>>> about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on >> the >>> way, >>>>>>>>> I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try >> and >>> put >>>>>>>>> something rudimentary in place. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should >> exploit >>>>>>>> error.log >>>>>>>>>> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to >>> report >>>>>>> them. >>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>> > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ3RL1rP3NbaWWqE4RAhqyAJoDbwrUaEeixN4M9paTELwDvFyuMwCeMrmW oSx/js8ui2+GTo9wre75TUo= =7QFK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Tim Ruppert
Thanks Tim,
Another request, could we have also the error.log file in the archive ? It's much more easier to use before diving in details... TIA Jacques From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> > http://log.ofbiz.org should have the previous days demo logs all zipped up in case there are multiple files. Please keep checking > it out as it's still in BETA :) > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I've got everything in place to have log files available to the >> community. Will be trying to release it officially tomorrow. >> >> Cheers, >> Tim >> -- >> Tim Ruppert >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> o:801.649.6594 >> f:801.649.6595 >> >> ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> > Hi Ashish, >> > >> > I'm more looking for errors generated after build, by users online. >> > But yes, these ones colud be interesting too... >> > >> > Jacques >> > >> > From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > Please take a look on the following link. >> > > http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger >> > > >> > > To me details can be of some help for us. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Ashish Vijaywargiya >> > > >> > > >> > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> > >> I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull. >> > >> Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix >> experience >> > >> > >> Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. >> > >> There are also MindTree Insight >> > >> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 >> > >> and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we >> > need a >> > >> such tools for now... >> > >> >> > >> Jacques >> > >> >> > >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >> > >>> I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day >> > >>> available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do >> > >>> build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like >> > >>> logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available >> for >> > >>> viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the >> >> > >>> route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send >> > >>> them to a place where we can pluck them off. >> > >>> >> > >>> Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's >> keep >> > >> > >>> chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the >> next >> > >>> day makes good sense to me. >> > >>> >> > >>> Cheers, >> > >>> Tim >> > >>> -- >> > >>> Tim Ruppert >> > >>> HotWax Media >> > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> > >>> >> > >>> o:801.649.6594 >> > >>> f:801.649.6595 >> > >>> >> > >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things >> > that >> > >>>> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? >> > >>>> Something like [hidden email]? I imagine that the >> > errors >> > >>>> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - >> but >> > it >> > >>>> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous >> > days >> > >>>> log file available to people who want to scan it as well. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very >> thing >> > at >> > >>>> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs >> - >> > will >> > >>>> loop you in David. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Cheers, >> > >>>> Tim >> > >>>> -- >> > >>>> Tim Ruppert >> > >>>> HotWax Media >> > >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> > >>>> >> > >>>> o:801.649.6594 >> > >>>> f:801.649.6595 >> > >>>> >> > >>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a >> > little >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all >> ERROR >> > and >> > >>>> > FATAL level messages. >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really >> > wanted >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list >> > would do >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even >> > >>>> hundreds >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > a day. >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > -David >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all >> that >> > well >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and >> > have >> > >>>> > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how >> we'd >> > go >> > >>>> > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on >> the >> > way, >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try >> and >> > put >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > > something rudimentary in place. >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > Cheers, >> > >>>> > > Tim >> > >>>> > > -- >> > >>>> > > Tim Ruppert >> > >>>> > > HotWax Media >> > >>>> > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > o:801.649.6594 >> > >>>> > > f:801.649.6595 >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >> > wrote: >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should >> exploit >> > >>>> > error.log >> > >>>> > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to >> > report >> > >>>> them. >> > >>>> > >> >> > >>>> > >> Jacques >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > > |
|
Administrator
|
Thanks Tim,
For those interested http://log.ofbiz.org/ have a look a trunk error.log For everybody, don't you think this log should be empty or near empty ? In 2 days we have already 2MB of log... Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > Thanks Tim, > > Another request, could we have also the error.log file in the archive ? It's much more easier to use before diving in details... > > TIA > > Jacques > > From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >> http://log.ofbiz.org should have the previous days demo logs all zipped up in case there are multiple files. Please keep >> checking it out as it's still in BETA :) >> >> Cheers, >> Tim >> -- >> Tim Ruppert >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> o:801.649.6594 >> f:801.649.6595 >> >> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> I've got everything in place to have log files available to the >>> community. Will be trying to release it officially tomorrow. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tim >>> -- >>> Tim Ruppert >>> HotWax Media >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> >>> o:801.649.6594 >>> f:801.649.6595 >>> >>> ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi Ashish, >>> > >>> > I'm more looking for errors generated after build, by users online. >>> > But yes, these ones colud be interesting too... >>> > >>> > Jacques >>> > >>> > From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>> > > Hello, >>> > > >>> > > Please take a look on the following link. >>> > > http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger >>> > > >>> > > To me details can be of some help for us. >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Ashish Vijaywargiya >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> > >> I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull. >>> > >> Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix >>> experience >>> > >>> > >> Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. >>> > >> There are also MindTree Insight >>> > >> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 >>> > >> and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we >>> > need a >>> > >> such tools for now... >>> > >> >>> > >> Jacques >>> > >> >>> > >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>> > >>> I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day >>> > >>> available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do >>> > >>> build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like >>> > >>> logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available >>> for >>> > >>> viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the >>> >>> > >>> route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send >>> > >>> them to a place where we can pluck them off. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's >>> keep >>> > >>> > >>> chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the >>> next >>> > >>> day makes good sense to me. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Cheers, >>> > >>> Tim >>> > >>> -- >>> > >>> Tim Ruppert >>> > >>> HotWax Media >>> > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> > >>> >>> > >>> o:801.649.6594 >>> > >>> f:801.649.6595 >>> > >>> >>> > >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>>> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things >>> > that >>> > >>>> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? >>> > >>>> Something like [hidden email]? I imagine that the >>> > errors >>> > >>>> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - >>> but >>> > it >>> > >>>> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous >>> > days >>> > >>>> log file available to people who want to scan it as well. >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very >>> thing >>> > at >>> > >>>> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs >>> - >>> > will >>> > >>>> loop you in David. >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Cheers, >>> > >>>> Tim >>> > >>>> -- >>> > >>>> Tim Ruppert >>> > >>>> HotWax Media >>> > >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> o:801.649.6594 >>> > >>>> f:801.649.6595 >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a >>> > little >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all >>> ERROR >>> > and >>> > >>>> > FATAL level messages. >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really >>> > wanted >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list >>> > would do >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even >>> > >>>> hundreds >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > a day. >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > -David >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all >>> that >>> > well >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and >>> > have >>> > >>>> > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how >>> we'd >>> > go >>> > >>>> > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on >>> the >>> > way, >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try >>> and >>> > put >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> > > something rudimentary in place. >>> > >>>> > > >>> > >>>> > > Cheers, >>> > >>>> > > Tim >>> > >>>> > > -- >>> > >>>> > > Tim Ruppert >>> > >>>> > > HotWax Media >>> > >>>> > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> > >>>> > > >>> > >>>> > > o:801.649.6594 >>> > >>>> > > f:801.649.6595 >>> > >>>> > > >>> > >>>> > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>>> > > >>> > >>>> > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should >>> exploit >>> > >>>> > error.log >>> > >>>> > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to >>> > report >>> > >>>> them. >>> > >>>> > >> >>> > >>>> > >> Jacques >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > >> > > |
|
Administrator
|
Mmm, I had a closer look. Most of the errors so far seems to xome from bots, or unlikely mad users, trying creasy things. So It's no
as bad as I thought at 1st glance :D Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > Thanks Tim, > > For those interested http://log.ofbiz.org/ have a look a trunk error.log > For everybody, don't you think this log should be empty or near empty ? In 2 days we have already 2MB of log... > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >> Thanks Tim, >> >> Another request, could we have also the error.log file in the archive ? It's much more easier to use before diving in details... >> >> TIA >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>> http://log.ofbiz.org should have the previous days demo logs all zipped up in case there are multiple files. Please keep >>> checking it out as it's still in BETA :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tim >>> -- >>> Tim Ruppert >>> HotWax Media >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> >>> o:801.649.6594 >>> f:801.649.6595 >>> >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> I've got everything in place to have log files available to the >>>> community. Will be trying to release it officially tomorrow. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Tim >>>> -- >>>> Tim Ruppert >>>> HotWax Media >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> >>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>> >>>> ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi Ashish, >>>> > >>>> > I'm more looking for errors generated after build, by users online. >>>> > But yes, these ones colud be interesting too... >>>> > >>>> > Jacques >>>> > >>>> > From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>> > > Hello, >>>> > > >>>> > > Please take a look on the following link. >>>> > > http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger >>>> > > >>>> > > To me details can be of some help for us. >>>> > > >>>> > > -- >>>> > > Ashish Vijaywargiya >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> > >> I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull. >>>> > >> Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix >>>> experience >>>> > >>>> > >> Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. >>>> > >> There are also MindTree Insight >>>> > >> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 >>>> > >> and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we >>>> > need a >>>> > >> such tools for now... >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Jacques >>>> > >> >>>> > >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>> > >>> I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day >>>> > >>> available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do >>>> > >>> build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like >>>> > >>> logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available >>>> for >>>> > >>> viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the >>>> >>>> > >>> route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send >>>> > >>> them to a place where we can pluck them off. >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's >>>> keep >>>> > >>>> > >>> chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the >>>> next >>>> > >>> day makes good sense to me. >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Cheers, >>>> > >>> Tim >>>> > >>> -- >>>> > >>> Tim Ruppert >>>> > >>> HotWax Media >>>> > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> o:801.649.6594 >>>> > >>> f:801.649.6595 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>>> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things >>>> > that >>>> > >>>> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? >>>> > >>>> Something like [hidden email]? I imagine that the >>>> > errors >>>> > >>>> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - >>>> but >>>> > it >>>> > >>>> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous >>>> > days >>>> > >>>> log file available to people who want to scan it as well. >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very >>>> thing >>>> > at >>>> > >>>> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs >>>> - >>>> > will >>>> > >>>> loop you in David. >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> Cheers, >>>> > >>>> Tim >>>> > >>>> -- >>>> > >>>> Tim Ruppert >>>> > >>>> HotWax Media >>>> > >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>> > >>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a >>>> > little >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all >>>> ERROR >>>> > and >>>> > >>>> > FATAL level messages. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really >>>> > wanted >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list >>>> > would do >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even >>>> > >>>> hundreds >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > a day. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -David >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all >>>> that >>>> > well >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and >>>> > have >>>> > >>>> > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how >>>> we'd >>>> > go >>>> > >>>> > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on >>>> the >>>> > way, >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try >>>> and >>>> > put >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> > > something rudimentary in place. >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > > Cheers, >>>> > >>>> > > Tim >>>> > >>>> > > -- >>>> > >>>> > > Tim Ruppert >>>> > >>>> > > HotWax Media >>>> > >>>> > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > > o:801.649.6594 >>>> > >>>> > > f:801.649.6595 >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should >>>> exploit >>>> > >>>> > error.log >>>> > >>>> > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to >>>> > report >>>> > >>>> them. >>>> > >>>> > >> >>>> > >>>> > >> Jacques >>>> > >>> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > > >>> >> >> > > |
«
Return to OFBiz - Dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |