This is willfully done. They are only warning. The goal is to know which problems arise and to fix them. There is a branch currently
used for that: typecheckcleanup200810. Scott is working on it.
Though reporting is warning is desirable, locally I just commented out the warnings
Index: framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/condition/EntityExpr.java
===================================================================
--- framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/condition/EntityExpr.java (revision 727747)
+++ framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/condition/EntityExpr.java (working copy)
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
if (!ObjectType.instanceOf(value, type.getJavaType())) {
String errMsg = "In entity field [" + modelEntity.getEntityName() + "." + curField.getName() + "] set the value passed
in [" + value.getClass().getName() + "] is not compatible with the Java type of the field [" + type.getJavaType() + "]";
// eventually we should do this, but for now we'll do a "soft" failure: throw new IllegalArgumentException(errMsg);
- Debug.logWarning(new Exception("Location of database type error"), "=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= DATABASE TYPE ERROR in EntityExpr
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= " + errMsg, module);
+ //Debug.logWarning(new Exception("Location of database type error"), "=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= DATABASE TYPE ERROR in
EntityExpr =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= " + errMsg, module);
}
}
Index: framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericEntity.java
===================================================================
--- framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericEntity.java (revision 727747)
+++ framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericEntity.java (working copy)
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@
if (!ObjectType.instanceOf(value, type.getJavaType())) {
String errMsg = "In entity field [" + this.getEntityName() + "." + name + "] set the value passed in [" +
value.getClass().getName() + "] is not compatible with the Java type of the field [" + type.getJavaType() + "]";
// eventually we should do this, but for now we'll do a "soft" failure: throw new
IllegalArgumentException(errMsg);
- Debug.logWarning(new Exception("Location of database type error"), "=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= DATABASE TYPE error IN
GenericEntity.set =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= " + errMsg, module);
+ //Debug.logWarning(new Exception("Location of database type error"), "=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= DATABASE TYPE error IN
GenericEntity.set =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= " + errMsg, module);
}
}
Object old = fields.put(name, value);
I tried as attachment also since it's more convenient
Jacques
----- Original Message -----
From: "madppiper" <
[hidden email]>
To: <
[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 5:27 PM
Subject: Database Type Error: not compatible with Double
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I am receiving a very strange error on the ecommerce application ever since
> I switched on the VAT feature, which reads as the following:
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= DATABASE TYPE ERROR in EntityExpr =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= In
> entity field [TaxAuthorityRateProduct.minPurchase] set the value passed in
> [java.math.BigDecimal] is not compatible with the Java type of the field
> [Double]
>
>
> Is this a known bug? I expect it to be caused by the productsummary
> screen...
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Database-Type-Error%3A-not-compatible-with-Double-tp21075962p21075962.html> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Locked
