Why was dojo left als the prefered Javascript toolkit?
A comparison between several Javascript toolkits has been made (see
following links) and is seems that dojo has performance advantages. It is
also used in other Apache and other mayor open source projects (e.g.
intalio). It seems that dojo is more widely used than prototype and backed
by mayor Open Source contributors in their products (e.g. IBM).
http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/dojo-vs-jquery-vs-mootools-vs-prototype-performance-comparisonhttp://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/UP3/Javascript+Toolkit+ComparisonRegards,
Pierre
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Anil Patel <
[hidden email]>wrote:
> Its just a co-incidence. I had to work on small improvement for one of our
> Ofbiz deployment that uses QuickAnonCheckoutProcess. That's when I thought
> of migrating QuickAnonCheckoutProcess out of using Dojo and instead use
> Prototype.js.
>
> Use of Dojo in eCommerce is minimal. Its used for handling Ajax request.
> Since then we adopted Prototype.js and and is widely used in Ofbiz.
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Anil Patel
>
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2008, at 5:22 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
> Is this related to the changes Abhishake Agarwal spoke about ?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <
[hidden email]>
>> Hi Anil,
>>
>> Just curious looking at
>>
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/eCommerce+Enhancements?#comments.
>> I did nto follow closely Dojo use in eCommerce, what is(are) the
>> problem(s) with Dojo ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>
>