FAQ ecition

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

FAQ ecition

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hi Sumit, All,

It's great to see people involved in free documenting as it's a critical resource for others without much reward to writers. So I
thank you for your last contribution in FAQ.

But please take into account that the Confluence version we are using is buggy when it comes to edit in Rich Text mode.
For instance
. it adds // (new line) at end of formatted blocks like {code} or {warning}, etc.
. it also replaces spaces by   in such blocks resulting in unreadable code lines
. there are some more...

Have a look at http://docs.ofbiz.org/pages/diffpages.action?pageId=5361&originalId=5358 and you will see what I mean.

It's not a big deal to come after to clean things (though replace // is annoying as you have also to get rid off added lines where
// were put by Confluence, else you end up with totally blank browser pages full of blank lines...) but so far I have to face this
alone.
I know now that I should have better created a page for Table of Content (ToC) and pages for contents. But it's also easier to deal
with a sole page with all in it (small snippets only, else I create pages and attachments). Sometimes also people add pages there
but without references in ToC, resulting in a less usable information.

So please don't take this personnaly as there have been a lot cases before I decided to write this message. It though that by
writing a Warning in top of the page I will get rid of these drawbacks. But as ever docs are not read (even by doc writers ;o), they
are used only when you face a problem, hence the famous RTFM.

As a side note, Wiki Markup is really easy to use and without any disadvantages.

One more time, thanks Sumit (and others, you are welcome) for your help. Also it's weird, but everytime I clean the page from
Confluence garbage, I find some points to improv. This is the positive aspect (I'm an hopelessy optimistic guy ;o)

Sorry for the long post, I had to write it

Jacques

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FAQ ecition

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Some other bad cases :
* # and ^ in {code} blocks. Of course we need to keelp \* \# and \^ in standard text (not formated blocks)
These are delicate issue to fix since if it's false the code means no longer anything (think about rewrite rules for instance).
Fortunately, most of the time it's not too hard to figure it out even when it's false.

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>

> Hi Sumit, All,
>
> It's great to see people involved in free documenting as it's a critical resource for others without much reward to writers. So I
> thank you for your last contribution in FAQ.
>
> But please take into account that the Confluence version we are using is buggy when it comes to edit in Rich Text mode.
> For instance
> . it adds // (new line) at end of formatted blocks like {code} or {warning}, etc.
> . it also replaces spaces by &nbsp; in such blocks resulting in unreadable code lines
> . there are some more...
>
> Have a look at http://docs.ofbiz.org/pages/diffpages.action?pageId=5361&originalId=5358 and you will see what I mean.
>
> It's not a big deal to come after to clean things (though replace // is annoying as you have also to get rid off added lines where
> // were put by Confluence, else you end up with totally blank browser pages full of blank lines...) but so far I have to face this
> alone.
> I know now that I should have better created a page for Table of Content (ToC) and pages for contents. But it's also easier to
> deal
> with a sole page with all in it (small snippets only, else I create pages and attachments). Sometimes also people add pages there
> but without references in ToC, resulting in a less usable information.
>
> So please don't take this personnaly as there have been a lot cases before I decided to write this message. It though that by
> writing a Warning in top of the page I will get rid of these drawbacks. But as ever docs are not read (even by doc writers ;o),
> they
> are used only when you face a problem, hence the famous RTFM.
>
> As a side note, Wiki Markup is really easy to use and without any disadvantages.
>
> One more time, thanks Sumit (and others, you are welcome) for your help. Also it's weird, but everytime I clean the page from
> Confluence garbage, I find some points to improv. This is the positive aspect (I'm an hopelessy optimistic guy ;o)
>
> Sorry for the long post, I had to write it
>
> Jacques
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FAQ ecition

Sumit Pandit-3
Oh jacques,

I am sorry, I was unaware of all these thing, Even i read the warning  
message once but i ignore it due to hurry in post the contents. Also I  
don't have much practice in writing the document and what precaution  
should i follow. But now i am learning.
Thank you very much for the guideline. And next time i will take care  
of such things.

Regarding to the my mistake in the doc, i will correct it soon, when  
ever i become free i will fix it in first priority.
Sorry for inconvenience.

Again thank you very much for the appreciation.

--
Thanks and Regards
Sumit Pandit.

On Sep 19, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Some other bad cases :
> * # and ^ in {code} blocks. Of course we need to keelp \* \# and \^  
> in standard text (not formated blocks)
> These are delicate issue to fix since if it's false the code means  
> no longer anything (think about rewrite rules for instance).  
> Fortunately, most of the time it's not too hard to figure it out  
> even when it's false.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>> Hi Sumit, All,
>>
>> It's great to see people involved in free documenting as it's a  
>> critical resource for others without much reward to writers. So I
>> thank you for your last contribution in FAQ.
>>
>> But please take into account that the Confluence version we are  
>> using is buggy when it comes to edit in Rich Text mode.
>> For instance
>> . it adds // (new line) at end of formatted blocks like {code} or  
>> {warning}, etc.
>> . it also replaces spaces by &nbsp; in such blocks resulting in  
>> unreadable code lines
>> . there are some more...
>>
>> Have a look at http://docs.ofbiz.org/pages/diffpages.action?pageId=5361&originalId=5358 
>>  and you will see what I mean.
>>
>> It's not a big deal to come after to clean things (though  
>> replace // is annoying as you have also to get rid off added lines  
>> where
>> // were put by Confluence, else you end up with totally blank  
>> browser pages full of blank lines...) but so far I have to face this
>> alone.
>> I know now that I should have better created a page for Table of  
>> Content (ToC) and pages for contents. But it's also easier to
>> deal
>> with a sole page with all in it (small snippets only, else I create  
>> pages and attachments). Sometimes also people add pages there
>> but without references in ToC, resulting in a less usable  
>> information.
>>
>> So please don't take this personnaly as there have been a lot cases  
>> before I decided to write this message. It though that by
>> writing a Warning in top of the page I will get rid of these  
>> drawbacks. But as ever docs are not read (even by doc writers ;o),
>> they
>> are used only when you face a problem, hence the famous RTFM.
>>
>> As a side note, Wiki Markup is really easy to use and without any  
>> disadvantages.
>>
>> One more time, thanks Sumit (and others, you are welcome) for your  
>> help. Also it's weird, but everytime I clean the page from
>> Confluence garbage, I find some points to improv. This is the  
>> positive aspect (I'm an hopelessy optimistic guy ;o)
>>
>> Sorry for the long post, I had to write it
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FAQ ecition

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
No problemo, you are welcome ! :D

Jacques

From: "Sumit Pandit" <[hidden email]>

> Oh jacques,
>
> I am sorry, I was unaware of all these thing, Even i read the warning  
> message once but i ignore it due to hurry in post the contents. Also I  
> don't have much practice in writing the document and what precaution  
> should i follow. But now i am learning.
> Thank you very much for the guideline. And next time i will take care  
> of such things.
>
> Regarding to the my mistake in the doc, i will correct it soon, when  
> ever i become free i will fix it in first priority.
> Sorry for inconvenience.
>
> Again thank you very much for the appreciation.
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> Sumit Pandit.
>
> On Sep 19, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Some other bad cases :
>> * # and ^ in {code} blocks. Of course we need to keelp \* \# and \^  
>> in standard text (not formated blocks)
>> These are delicate issue to fix since if it's false the code means  
>> no longer anything (think about rewrite rules for instance).  
>> Fortunately, most of the time it's not too hard to figure it out  
>> even when it's false.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>> Hi Sumit, All,
>>>
>>> It's great to see people involved in free documenting as it's a  
>>> critical resource for others without much reward to writers. So I
>>> thank you for your last contribution in FAQ.
>>>
>>> But please take into account that the Confluence version we are  
>>> using is buggy when it comes to edit in Rich Text mode.
>>> For instance
>>> . it adds // (new line) at end of formatted blocks like {code} or  
>>> {warning}, etc.
>>> . it also replaces spaces by &nbsp; in such blocks resulting in  
>>> unreadable code lines
>>> . there are some more...
>>>
>>> Have a look at http://docs.ofbiz.org/pages/diffpages.action?pageId=5361&originalId=5358 
>>>  and you will see what I mean.
>>>
>>> It's not a big deal to come after to clean things (though  
>>> replace // is annoying as you have also to get rid off added lines  
>>> where
>>> // were put by Confluence, else you end up with totally blank  
>>> browser pages full of blank lines...) but so far I have to face this
>>> alone.
>>> I know now that I should have better created a page for Table of  
>>> Content (ToC) and pages for contents. But it's also easier to
>>> deal
>>> with a sole page with all in it (small snippets only, else I create  
>>> pages and attachments). Sometimes also people add pages there
>>> but without references in ToC, resulting in a less usable  
>>> information.
>>>
>>> So please don't take this personnaly as there have been a lot cases  
>>> before I decided to write this message. It though that by
>>> writing a Warning in top of the page I will get rid of these  
>>> drawbacks. But as ever docs are not read (even by doc writers ;o),
>>> they
>>> are used only when you face a problem, hence the famous RTFM.
>>>
>>> As a side note, Wiki Markup is really easy to use and without any  
>>> disadvantages.
>>>
>>> One more time, thanks Sumit (and others, you are welcome) for your  
>>> help. Also it's weird, but everytime I clean the page from
>>> Confluence garbage, I find some points to improv. This is the  
>>> positive aspect (I'm an hopelessy optimistic guy ;o)
>>>
>>> Sorry for the long post, I had to write it
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>
>