Freemarker 2.3.20 is released

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Freemarker 2.3.20 is released

Jacopo Cappellato-4
Current situation: in OFBiz we are currently using/distributing a patched version of Freemarker 2.3.19; the patch version addresses the bugs reported below.

News: the new version of Freemarker (2.3.20) has been finally released and it is available for download:

http://freemarker.org/docs/versions_2_3_20.html

Good News: the deadlock issue that was affecting OFBiz (under special conditions) that we have reported and helped to fix, has been resolved:

http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/361/

Bad News: the "Wrong overloaded method" issue, for which Adam Heat submitted a patch to the Freemarker community and patched the 2.3.19 release we are using, was not resolved in this release:

http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/

Adam, could you please check this comment from Daniel and possibly follow up with him?

http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?limit=10&page=1#bb98

"I'm looking into the overloaded method related parts (I don't mean the patch) and... there are other issues as well. Certainly I will have to *try* redesign/rewrite this stuff pretty much (it's tricky because of FM object wrapping), and of course, I will have to add switch where you can chose between old and the new implementation, globally or per template. Now this 100% won't be finished in two days, so I guess 2.3.20 will be release without this, but then I continue working on this, and release 2.3.21 when this and some other smaller things are done..."

Thanks,

Jacopo

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Freemarker 2.3.20 is released

Jacopo Cappellato-4
If there are no objections I would like to upgrade the trunk with the latest official 2.3.20 release; then after some time, if we will not face any issues related to the overloaded methods in templates I will backport the jar to the 13.07 branch: in this way we will distribute the official Freemarker jars, and it will be easy to stay updated with the new bug fix releases from the Freemarker community.

Jacopo


On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Current situation: in OFBiz we are currently using/distributing a patched version of Freemarker 2.3.19; the patch version addresses the bugs reported below.
>
> News: the new version of Freemarker (2.3.20) has been finally released and it is available for download:
>
> http://freemarker.org/docs/versions_2_3_20.html
>
> Good News: the deadlock issue that was affecting OFBiz (under special conditions) that we have reported and helped to fix, has been resolved:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/361/
>
> Bad News: the "Wrong overloaded method" issue, for which Adam Heat submitted a patch to the Freemarker community and patched the 2.3.19 release we are using, was not resolved in this release:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/
>
> Adam, could you please check this comment from Daniel and possibly follow up with him?
>
> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?limit=10&page=1#bb98
>
> "I'm looking into the overloaded method related parts (I don't mean the patch) and... there are other issues as well. Certainly I will have to *try* redesign/rewrite this stuff pretty much (it's tricky because of FM object wrapping), and of course, I will have to add switch where you can chose between old and the new implementation, globally or per template. Now this 100% won't be finished in two days, so I guess 2.3.20 will be release without this, but then I continue working on this, and release 2.3.21 when this and some other smaller things are done..."
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jacopo
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Freemarker 2.3.20 is released

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
+1

Jacques

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: Freemarker 2.3.20 is released


> If there are no objections I would like to upgrade the trunk with the latest official 2.3.20 release; then after some time, if we will not face any issues related to the overloaded methods in templates I will backport the jar to the 13.07 branch: in this way we will distribute the official Freemarker jars, and it will be easy to stay updated with the new bug fix releases from the Freemarker community.
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Current situation: in OFBiz we are currently using/distributing a patched version of Freemarker 2.3.19; the patch version addresses the bugs reported below.
>>
>> News: the new version of Freemarker (2.3.20) has been finally released and it is available for download:
>>
>> http://freemarker.org/docs/versions_2_3_20.html
>>
>> Good News: the deadlock issue that was affecting OFBiz (under special conditions) that we have reported and helped to fix, has been resolved:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/361/
>>
>> Bad News: the "Wrong overloaded method" issue, for which Adam Heat submitted a patch to the Freemarker community and patched the 2.3.19 release we are using, was not resolved in this release:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/
>>
>> Adam, could you please check this comment from Daniel and possibly follow up with him?
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?limit=10&page=1#bb98
>>
>> "I'm looking into the overloaded method related parts (I don't mean the patch) and... there are other issues as well. Certainly I will have to *try* redesign/rewrite this stuff pretty much (it's tricky because of FM object wrapping), and of course, I will have to add switch where you can chose between old and the new implementation, globally or per template. Now this 100% won't be finished in two days, so I guess 2.3.20 will be release without this, but then I continue working on this, and release 2.3.21 when this and some other smaller things are done..."
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Freemarker 2.3.20 is released

Deepak Dixit-2
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
+1


Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit

On Aug 14, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> If there are no objections I would like to upgrade the trunk with the latest official 2.3.20 release; then after some time, if we will not face any issues related to the overloaded methods in templates I will backport the jar to the 13.07 branch: in this way we will distribute the official Freemarker jars, and it will be easy to stay updated with the new bug fix releases from the Freemarker community.
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Current situation: in OFBiz we are currently using/distributing a patched version of Freemarker 2.3.19; the patch version addresses the bugs reported below.
>>
>> News: the new version of Freemarker (2.3.20) has been finally released and it is available for download:
>>
>> http://freemarker.org/docs/versions_2_3_20.html
>>
>> Good News: the deadlock issue that was affecting OFBiz (under special conditions) that we have reported and helped to fix, has been resolved:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/361/
>>
>> Bad News: the "Wrong overloaded method" issue, for which Adam Heat submitted a patch to the Freemarker community and patched the 2.3.19 release we are using, was not resolved in this release:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/
>>
>> Adam, could you please check this comment from Daniel and possibly follow up with him?
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?limit=10&page=1#bb98
>>
>> "I'm looking into the overloaded method related parts (I don't mean the patch) and... there are other issues as well. Certainly I will have to *try* redesign/rewrite this stuff pretty much (it's tricky because of FM object wrapping), and of course, I will have to add switch where you can chose between old and the new implementation, globally or per template. Now this 100% won't be finished in two days, so I guess 2.3.20 will be release without this, but then I continue working on this, and release 2.3.21 when this and some other smaller things are done..."
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>


smime.p7s (6K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Freemarker 2.3.20 is released

Ashish Vijaywargiya
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
+1

--
Kind Regards
Ashish Vijaywargiya


On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> If there are no objections I would like to upgrade the trunk with the
> latest official 2.3.20 release; then after some time, if we will not face
> any issues related to the overloaded methods in templates I will backport
> the jar to the 13.07 branch: in this way we will distribute the official
> Freemarker jars, and it will be easy to stay updated with the new bug fix
> releases from the Freemarker community.
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Current situation: in OFBiz we are currently using/distributing a
> patched version of Freemarker 2.3.19; the patch version addresses the bugs
> reported below.
> >
> > News: the new version of Freemarker (2.3.20) has been finally released
> and it is available for download:
> >
> > http://freemarker.org/docs/versions_2_3_20.html
> >
> > Good News: the deadlock issue that was affecting OFBiz (under special
> conditions) that we have reported and helped to fix, has been resolved:
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/361/
> >
> > Bad News: the "Wrong overloaded method" issue, for which Adam Heat
> submitted a patch to the Freemarker community and patched the 2.3.19
> release we are using, was not resolved in this release:
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/
> >
> > Adam, could you please check this comment from Daniel and possibly
> follow up with him?
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?limit=10&page=1#bb98
> >
> > "I'm looking into the overloaded method related parts (I don't mean the
> patch) and... there are other issues as well. Certainly I will have to
> *try* redesign/rewrite this stuff pretty much (it's tricky because of FM
> object wrapping), and of course, I will have to add switch where you can
> chose between old and the new implementation, globally or per template. Now
> this 100% won't be finished in two days, so I guess 2.3.20 will be release
> without this, but then I continue working on this, and release 2.3.21 when
> this and some other smaller things are done..."
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jacopo
> >
>
>