[Fwd: Re: Datasource vs Database]

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Fwd: Re: Datasource vs Database]

BJ Freeman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Please start referring to entities and fields
also point out the use of the webtools entity maintanence.
need to get away from database terminology.
thanks.

- -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Datasource vs Database
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:43:02 +0100
From: Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>

+1

Could you compile a list of changes needed please ?

Thks

Jacques

From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>

> I would like our documentation of refer only to Datasources and entities
> and remove references to Databases and Tables.
> The only exception would be when we are talking about a Datasource that
> is a Database the files that relate directly to a Database like the
> fieldtype
> My reason is that people like me, that come from a database centric
> background, have a tendency to relate to references to databases that
> takes them down the wrong path.
>
> We need to make a strong statement that the Database is simply a
> type datasource for Storing Data, nothing else.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJhjjprP3NbaWWqE4RAp4aAKCJP1NncGr4r9hi7OnKlFNJSK5RFACfWAly
7lu/TD04LPrPk1A/JWdB3P0=
=q2ci
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: Datasource vs Database]

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
You mean in wiki FAQ for instance, or in wiki at large ?

Jacques

From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Please start referring to entities and fields
> also point out the use of the webtools entity maintanence.
> need to get away from database terminology.
> thanks.
>
> - -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Datasource vs Database
> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:43:02 +0100
> From: Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>
> +1
>
> Could you compile a list of changes needed please ?
>
> Thks
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>
>> I would like our documentation of refer only to Datasources and entities
>> and remove references to Databases and Tables.
>> The only exception would be when we are talking about a Datasource that
>> is a Database the files that relate directly to a Database like the
>> fieldtype
>> My reason is that people like me, that come from a database centric
>> background, have a tendency to relate to references to databases that
>> takes them down the wrong path.
>>
>> We need to make a strong statement that the Database is simply a
>> type datasource for Storing Data, nothing else.
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFJhjjprP3NbaWWqE4RAp4aAKCJP1NncGr4r9hi7OnKlFNJSK5RFACfWAly
> 7lu/TD04LPrPk1A/JWdB3P0=
> =q2ci
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Datasource vs Database]

BJ Freeman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I mean documentation about ofbiz or am I out of line.


Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 2/2/2009 12:32 AM:

> You mean in wiki FAQ for instance, or in wiki at large ?
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>
> Please start referring to entities and fields
> also point out the use of the webtools entity maintanence.
> need to get away from database terminology.
> thanks.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Datasource vs Database
> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:43:02 +0100
> From: Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>
> +1
>
> Could you compile a list of changes needed please ?
>
> Thks
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>
>>>> I would like our documentation of refer only to Datasources and entities
>>>> and remove references to Databases and Tables.
>>>> The only exception would be when we are talking about a Datasource that
>>>> is a Database the files that relate directly to a Database like the
>>>> fieldtype
>>>> My reason is that people like me, that come from a database centric
>>>> background, have a tendency to relate to references to databases that
>>>> takes them down the wrong path.
>>>>
>>>> We need to make a strong statement that the Database is simply a
>>>> type datasource for Storing Data, nothing else.
>>>>
>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJhsLvrP3NbaWWqE4RAmSvAKC1xCPBUMqMcZIEsPe7lNGrXj+tdQCgku4s
Hzk/UtEt3QAGilQ6vij8Otk=
=aXlR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Datasource vs Database]

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
OK, looking forwad for you help on this topic :p

Jacques

From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I mean documentation about ofbiz or am I out of line.
>
>
> Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 2/2/2009 12:32 AM:
>> You mean in wiki FAQ for instance, or in wiki at large ?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>
>> Please start referring to entities and fields
>> also point out the use of the webtools entity maintanence.
>> need to get away from database terminology.
>> thanks.
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: Datasource vs Database
>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:43:02 +0100
>> From: Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Could you compile a list of changes needed please ?
>>
>> Thks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>
>>>>> I would like our documentation of refer only to Datasources and entities
>>>>> and remove references to Databases and Tables.
>>>>> The only exception would be when we are talking about a Datasource that
>>>>> is a Database the files that relate directly to a Database like the
>>>>> fieldtype
>>>>> My reason is that people like me, that come from a database centric
>>>>> background, have a tendency to relate to references to databases that
>>>>> takes them down the wrong path.
>>>>>
>>>>> We need to make a strong statement that the Database is simply a
>>>>> type datasource for Storing Data, nothing else.
>>>>>
>>>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFJhsLvrP3NbaWWqE4RAmSvAKC1xCPBUMqMcZIEsPe7lNGrXj+tdQCgku4s
> Hzk/UtEt3QAGilQ6vij8Otk=
> =aXlR
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>