-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Please start referring to entities and fields also point out the use of the webtools entity maintanence. need to get away from database terminology. thanks. - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Datasource vs Database Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:43:02 +0100 From: Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> +1 Could you compile a list of changes needed please ? Thks Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> > I would like our documentation of refer only to Datasources and entities > and remove references to Databases and Tables. > The only exception would be when we are talking about a Datasource that > is a Database the files that relate directly to a Database like the > fieldtype > My reason is that people like me, that come from a database centric > background, have a tendency to relate to references to databases that > takes them down the wrong path. > > We need to make a strong statement that the Database is simply a > type datasource for Storing Data, nothing else. > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJhjjprP3NbaWWqE4RAp4aAKCJP1NncGr4r9hi7OnKlFNJSK5RFACfWAly 7lu/TD04LPrPk1A/JWdB3P0= =q2ci -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Administrator
|
You mean in wiki FAQ for instance, or in wiki at large ?
Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Please start referring to entities and fields > also point out the use of the webtools entity maintanence. > need to get away from database terminology. > thanks. > > - -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Datasource vs Database > Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:43:02 +0100 > From: Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> > > +1 > > Could you compile a list of changes needed please ? > > Thks > > Jacques > > From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >> I would like our documentation of refer only to Datasources and entities >> and remove references to Databases and Tables. >> The only exception would be when we are talking about a Datasource that >> is a Database the files that relate directly to a Database like the >> fieldtype >> My reason is that people like me, that come from a database centric >> background, have a tendency to relate to references to databases that >> takes them down the wrong path. >> >> We need to make a strong statement that the Database is simply a >> type datasource for Storing Data, nothing else. >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFJhjjprP3NbaWWqE4RAp4aAKCJP1NncGr4r9hi7OnKlFNJSK5RFACfWAly > 7lu/TD04LPrPk1A/JWdB3P0= > =q2ci > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 I mean documentation about ofbiz or am I out of line. Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 2/2/2009 12:32 AM: > You mean in wiki FAQ for instance, or in wiki at large ? > > Jacques > > From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> > Please start referring to entities and fields > also point out the use of the webtools entity maintanence. > need to get away from database terminology. > thanks. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Datasource vs Database > Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:43:02 +0100 > From: Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> > > +1 > > Could you compile a list of changes needed please ? > > Thks > > Jacques > > From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >>>> I would like our documentation of refer only to Datasources and entities >>>> and remove references to Databases and Tables. >>>> The only exception would be when we are talking about a Datasource that >>>> is a Database the files that relate directly to a Database like the >>>> fieldtype >>>> My reason is that people like me, that come from a database centric >>>> background, have a tendency to relate to references to databases that >>>> takes them down the wrong path. >>>> >>>> We need to make a strong statement that the Database is simply a >>>> type datasource for Storing Data, nothing else. >>>> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJhsLvrP3NbaWWqE4RAmSvAKC1xCPBUMqMcZIEsPe7lNGrXj+tdQCgku4s Hzk/UtEt3QAGilQ6vij8Otk= =aXlR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Administrator
|
OK, looking forwad for you help on this topic :p
Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I mean documentation about ofbiz or am I out of line. > > > Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 2/2/2009 12:32 AM: >> You mean in wiki FAQ for instance, or in wiki at large ? >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >> Please start referring to entities and fields >> also point out the use of the webtools entity maintanence. >> need to get away from database terminology. >> thanks. >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: Datasource vs Database >> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:43:02 +0100 >> From: Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> >> >> +1 >> >> Could you compile a list of changes needed please ? >> >> Thks >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >>>>> I would like our documentation of refer only to Datasources and entities >>>>> and remove references to Databases and Tables. >>>>> The only exception would be when we are talking about a Datasource that >>>>> is a Database the files that relate directly to a Database like the >>>>> fieldtype >>>>> My reason is that people like me, that come from a database centric >>>>> background, have a tendency to relate to references to databases that >>>>> takes them down the wrong path. >>>>> >>>>> We need to make a strong statement that the Database is simply a >>>>> type datasource for Storing Data, nothing else. >>>>> >>> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFJhsLvrP3NbaWWqE4RAmSvAKC1xCPBUMqMcZIEsPe7lNGrXj+tdQCgku4s > Hzk/UtEt3QAGilQ6vij8Otk= > =aXlR > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |