Geo data groups

[Jacopo Cappellato-3]

I would like to create seed data for some geo groups: Asia, South  
America, Africa.
They can be useful for defining shipping estimates rules (for example).

Is it ok if I create the group members for the following three new  
groups?

<Geo abbreviation="AFR" geoCode="AFR" geoTypeId="GROUP" geoId="AFR"  
geoName="Africa"/>

<Geo abbreviation="ASI" geoCode="ASI" geoTypeId="GROUP" geoId="ASI"  
geoName="Asia"/>

<Geo abbreviation="SAM" geoCode="SAM" geoTypeId="GROUP" geoId="SAM"  
geoName="South America"/>

What do you think about the names of the above groups.

I would like to define the new groups in a new file GeoDataGroups.xml  
and move there the existing group for European Union.

Is it ok?

Jacopo

[Jacques Le Roux]

Maybe we could subdivide Asia (it's so large) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subregions_of_Asia ? At least taking apart Southeastern
Asia ?
Is Mexico part of South America ?

Jacques

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>

>I would like to create seed data for some geo groups: Asia, South  America, Africa.
> They can be useful for defining shipping estimates rules (for example).
>
> Is it ok if I create the group members for the following three new  groups?
>
> <Geo abbreviation="AFR" geoCode="AFR" geoTypeId="GROUP" geoId="AFR"  geoName="Africa"/>
>
> <Geo abbreviation="ASI" geoCode="ASI" geoTypeId="GROUP" geoId="ASI"  geoName="Asia"/>
>
> <Geo abbreviation="SAM" geoCode="SAM" geoTypeId="GROUP" geoId="SAM"  geoName="South America"/>
>
> What do you think about the names of the above groups.
>
> I would like to define the new groups in a new file GeoDataGroups.xml  and move there the existing group for European Union.
>
> Is it ok?
>
> Jacopo
>

[Adrian Crum]

Mexico is Central America.

Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Maybe we could subdivide Asia (it's so large)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subregions_of_Asia ? At least taking apart
> Southeastern Asia ?
> Is Mexico part of South America ?
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>> I would like to create seed data for some geo groups: Asia, South  
>> America, Africa.
>> They can be useful for defining shipping estimates rules (for example).
>>
>> Is it ok if I create the group members for the following three new  
>> groups?
>>
>> <Geo abbreviation="AFR" geoCode="AFR" geoTypeId="GROUP" geoId="AFR"  
>> geoName="Africa"/>
>>
>> <Geo abbreviation="ASI" geoCode="ASI" geoTypeId="GROUP" geoId="ASI"  
>> geoName="Asia"/>
>>
>> <Geo abbreviation="SAM" geoCode="SAM" geoTypeId="GROUP" geoId="SAM"  
>> geoName="South America"/>
>>
>> What do you think about the names of the above groups.
>>
>> I would like to define the new groups in a new file GeoDataGroups.xml  
>> and move there the existing group for European Union.
>>
>> Is it ok?
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Then we may consider also Central America ?

Jacques

From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>

> Mexico is Central America.
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Maybe we could subdivide Asia (it's so large)
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subregions_of_Asia ? At least taking apart
>> Southeastern Asia ?
>> Is Mexico part of South America ?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>>> I would like to create seed data for some geo groups: Asia, South  
>>> America, Africa.
>>> They can be useful for defining shipping estimates rules (for example).
>>>
>>> Is it ok if I create the group members for the following three new  
>>> groups?
>>>
>>> <Geo abbreviation="AFR" geoCode="AFR" geoTypeId="GROUP" geoId="AFR"  
>>> geoName="Africa"/>
>>>
>>> <Geo abbreviation="ASI" geoCode="ASI" geoTypeId="GROUP" geoId="ASI"  
>>> geoName="Asia"/>
>>>
>>> <Geo abbreviation="SAM" geoCode="SAM" geoTypeId="GROUP" geoId="SAM"  
>>> geoName="South America"/>
>>>
>>> What do you think about the names of the above groups.
>>>
>>> I would like to define the new groups in a new file GeoDataGroups.xml  
>>> and move there the existing group for European Union.
>>>
>>> Is it ok?
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>
>>
>