Hi all,
the gathering of iCLAs from past and present contributors is mostly completed now: we are waiting for the last three ones, that hopefully will be sent soon. It is time to start to deal with the license change for all the OFBiz's files. Help is needed here: we have to put the Apache License header at the top of each and every file in OFBiz (binary files excluded); the license headers for all the types of files (xml, java, ftl, properties, bsh, html) are in ofbiz/APACHE2_HEADER; these headers should replace the existing MIT headers (if they are present). Regexp, search&replace tools, perl scripts, etc... are all good, if you are an expert and are willing to help, just drop a note and then, when the work is completed, just send us a few patches (maybe one for the applications and one for the framework). In the attached file you'll find some tools (in perl, python and java) downloaded from the Apache site to migrate source files headers from the Apache License 1.1 to Apache License 2.0... maybe they could be a good starting point. PLEASE HELP, Jacopo relicense.zip (26K) Download Attachment |
Hi Jacopo
Like I've said previously I'm happy to help with this, if it's ok with you I'll start with the applications folder? One question though, what do i do with these lines: Old Headers: * @author David E. Jones ([hidden email]) * @author Andy Zeneski ([hidden email]) * @author Si Chen ([hidden email]) * @version $Rev: 418498 $ New Headers: * $Id: $ Do the author lines remain in place? And what goes on the $Id tags? Regards Scott On 13/07/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > the gathering of iCLAs from past and present contributors is mostly > completed now: we are waiting for the last three ones, that hopefully > will be sent soon. > > It is time to start to deal with the license change for all the OFBiz's > files. > > Help is needed here: > we have to put the Apache License header at the top of each and every > file in OFBiz (binary files excluded); the license headers for all the > types of files (xml, java, ftl, properties, bsh, html) are in > ofbiz/APACHE2_HEADER; these headers should replace the existing MIT > headers (if they are present). > Regexp, search&replace tools, perl scripts, etc... are all good, if you > are an expert and are willing to help, just drop a note and then, when > the work is completed, just send us a few patches (maybe one for the > applications and one for the framework). > > In the attached file you'll find some tools (in perl, python and java) > downloaded from the Apache site to migrate source files headers from the > Apache License 1.1 to Apache License 2.0... maybe they could be a good > starting point. > > PLEASE HELP, > > Jacopo > > > |
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Jacopo,
I applied for iCLA.It has been accepted by Apache Group. I am also doing my work in ofbiz. You can view my name on the following list: http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html#unlistedclas I am also interested in this work of migration. Will you assign me work or i will tell you about my interested component. How could it be possible for me to introduce my name in your's list of collected iCLAs??? Thanks Ashish Vijaywargiya Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi all, the gathering of iCLAs from past and present contributors is mostly completed now: we are waiting for the last three ones, that hopefully will be sent soon. It is time to start to deal with the license change for all the OFBiz's files. Help is needed here: we have to put the Apache License header at the top of each and every file in OFBiz (binary files excluded); the license headers for all the types of files (xml, java, ftl, properties, bsh, html) are in ofbiz/APACHE2_HEADER; these headers should replace the existing MIT headers (if they are present). Regexp, search&replace tools, perl scripts, etc... are all good, if you are an expert and are willing to help, just drop a note and then, when the work is completed, just send us a few patches (maybe one for the applications and one for the framework). In the attached file you'll find some tools (in perl, python and java) downloaded from the Apache site to migrate source files headers from the Apache License 1.1 to Apache License 2.0... maybe they could be a good starting point. PLEASE HELP, Jacopo --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. |
In reply to this post by Scott Gray
Also, there seem to be a couple of xml tags here and there like
<vendor>,<copyright> and <owner>, should these also be deleted? -Scott On 13/07/06, Scott Gray <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi Jacopo > > Like I've said previously I'm happy to help with this, if it's ok with you > I'll start with the applications folder? One question though, what do i do > with these lines: > > Old Headers: > * @author David E. Jones ([hidden email]) > * @author Andy Zeneski ([hidden email]) > * @author Si Chen ([hidden email]) > * @version $Rev: 418498 $ > > New Headers: > * $Id: $ > > Do the author lines remain in place? And what goes on the $Id tags? > > Regards > Scott > > > On 13/07/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > the gathering of iCLAs from past and present contributors is mostly > > completed now: we are waiting for the last three ones, that hopefully > > will be sent soon. > > > > It is time to start to deal with the license change for all the OFBiz's > > files. > > > > Help is needed here: > > we have to put the Apache License header at the top of each and every > > file in OFBiz (binary files excluded); the license headers for all the > > types of files (xml, java, ftl, properties, bsh, html) are in > > ofbiz/APACHE2_HEADER; these headers should replace the existing MIT > > headers (if they are present). > > Regexp, search&replace tools, perl scripts, etc... are all good, if you > > are an expert and are willing to help, just drop a note and then, when > > the work is completed, just send us a few patches (maybe one for the > > applications and one for the framework). > > > > In the attached file you'll find some tools (in perl, python and java) > > downloaded from the Apache site to migrate source files headers from the > > > > Apache License 1.1 to Apache License 2.0... maybe they could be a good > > starting point. > > > > PLEASE HELP, > > > > Jacopo > > > > > > > |
In reply to this post by Scott Gray
Scott Gray schrieb:
> Hi Jacopo > > Like I've said previously I'm happy to help with this, if it's ok with you > I'll start with the applications folder? One question though, what do i do > with these lines: > > Old Headers: > * @author David E. Jones ([hidden email]) > * @author Andy Zeneski ([hidden email]) > * @author Si Chen ([hidden email]) > * @version $Rev: 418498 $ > > New Headers: > * $Id: $ > > Do the author lines remain in place? And what goes on the $Id tags? The ASF board recommendation is to remove individual authors tag but it's up to the PMC to make the decision (to use author tags or not). See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107788069123268&w=2 for some more infomationan. -- Christian |
In reply to this post by Ashish Vijaywargiya-2
> I applied for iCLA.It has been accepted by Apache Group.
> I am also doing my work in ofbiz. > You can view my name on the following list: http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html#unlistedclas > I am also interested in this work of migration. > Will you assign me work or i will tell you about my interested component. > How could it be possible for me to introduce my name in your's list of collected iCLAs??? Hi, it's good that you're willing to help out! However, commit priviledges in most ASF (and most open source projects in general), are given, not requested. The committer role is described here: http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#roles Usually, what happens, is someone contributes to the project (via patches, tickets, documentation, etc..) for a while, until the other committers feel comfortable with letting that person have access to the repository. If you just want to help out... then you don't need an iCLA, just send in your patches to the ticket system (JIRA)! -- David N. Welton - http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/ Linux, Open Source Consulting - http://www.dedasys.com/ |
In reply to this post by Christian Geisert
I'd prefer to remove all the existing @authors tags, in fact the
"authors" of a file are determined by the svn log history. I'd also remove all the @version and $rev tags as well... but maybe we should start a vote on this subject. Jacopo Christian Geisert wrote: > Scott Gray schrieb: >> Hi Jacopo >> >> Like I've said previously I'm happy to help with this, if it's ok with you >> I'll start with the applications folder? One question though, what do i do >> with these lines: >> >> Old Headers: >> * @author David E. Jones ([hidden email]) >> * @author Andy Zeneski ([hidden email]) >> * @author Si Chen ([hidden email]) >> * @version $Rev: 418498 $ >> >> New Headers: >> * $Id: $ >> >> Do the author lines remain in place? And what goes on the $Id tags? > > The ASF board recommendation is to remove individual authors tag but > it's up to the PMC to make the decision (to use author tags or not). > > See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107788069123268&w=2 > for some more infomationan. > |
In reply to this post by Scott Gray
Hi Scott,
and thanks for your help: starting with the application folders is fine, just keep in mind that some files are already converted (e.g. the manufacturing component). Please see my comments below: Scott Gray wrote: > Hi Jacopo > > New Headers: > * $Id: $ > > Do the author lines remain in place? And what goes on the $Id tags? We will probably vote on this; however there is nothing special in the $Id tag: simply copy the license header file ($Id tag included) at the top of the files. Jacopo > > Regards > Scott > > On 13/07/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> the gathering of iCLAs from past and present contributors is mostly >> completed now: we are waiting for the last three ones, that hopefully >> will be sent soon. >> >> It is time to start to deal with the license change for all the OFBiz's >> files. >> >> Help is needed here: >> we have to put the Apache License header at the top of each and every >> file in OFBiz (binary files excluded); the license headers for all the >> types of files (xml, java, ftl, properties, bsh, html) are in >> ofbiz/APACHE2_HEADER; these headers should replace the existing MIT >> headers (if they are present). >> Regexp, search&replace tools, perl scripts, etc... are all good, if you >> are an expert and are willing to help, just drop a note and then, when >> the work is completed, just send us a few patches (maybe one for the >> applications and one for the framework). >> >> In the attached file you'll find some tools (in perl, python and java) >> downloaded from the Apache site to migrate source files headers from the >> Apache License 1.1 to Apache License 2.0... maybe they could be a good >> starting point. >> >> PLEASE HELP, >> >> Jacopo >> >> >> > |
In reply to this post by Ashish Vijaywargiya-2
Ashish,
I've added your name to the list of persons with an iCLa on file in the OFBiz page. About the work on license migration... maybe you could coordinate with Scott? I think he will start working on the application folder, so you could help him there or work on some components from the framework... Thanks, Jacopo Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > I applied for iCLA.It has been accepted by Apache Group. > I am also doing my work in ofbiz. > You can view my name on the following list: http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html#unlistedclas > I am also interested in this work of migration. > Will you assign me work or i will tell you about my interested component. > How could it be possible for me to introduce my name in your's list of collected iCLAs??? > > Thanks > Ashish Vijaywargiya > > Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi all, > > the gathering of iCLAs from past and present contributors is mostly > completed now: we are waiting for the last three ones, that hopefully > will be sent soon. > > It is time to start to deal with the license change for all the OFBiz's > files. > > Help is needed here: > we have to put the Apache License header at the top of each and every > file in OFBiz (binary files excluded); the license headers for all the > types of files (xml, java, ftl, properties, bsh, html) are in > ofbiz/APACHE2_HEADER; these headers should replace the existing MIT > headers (if they are present). > Regexp, search&replace tools, perl scripts, etc... are all good, if you > are an expert and are willing to help, just drop a note and then, when > the work is completed, just send us a few patches (maybe one for the > applications and one for the framework). > > In the attached file you'll find some tools (in perl, python and java) > downloaded from the Apache site to migrate source files headers from the > Apache License 1.1 to Apache License 2.0... maybe they could be a good > starting point. > > PLEASE HELP, > > Jacopo > > > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato
> I'd prefer to remove all the existing @authors tags, in fact the
> "authors" of a file are determined by the svn log history. > I'd also remove all the @version and $rev tags as well... but maybe we > should start a vote on this subject. > > Jacopo +1 > > Christian Geisert wrote: > > Scott Gray schrieb: > >> Hi Jacopo > >> > >> Like I've said previously I'm happy to help with this, if it's ok with you > >> I'll start with the applications folder? One question though, what do i do > >> with these lines: > >> > >> Old Headers: > >> * @author David E. Jones ([hidden email]) > >> * @author Andy Zeneski ([hidden email]) > >> * @author Si Chen ([hidden email]) > >> * @version $Rev: 418498 $ > >> > >> New Headers: > >> * $Id: $ > >> > >> Do the author lines remain in place? And what goes on the $Id tags? > > > > The ASF board recommendation is to remove individual authors tag but > > it's up to the PMC to make the decision (to use author tags or not). > > > > See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107788069123268&w=2 > > for some more infomationan. > > |
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato
+1
however would like to include these, just under the module line, in all files. This is used by code to see if the release number will be supported by all code. public static final String major_version = "1."; public static final String minor_version = "0.1.2"; public static final String sinceofbizversion = "3.2"; public static final String maxsupportedofbizversion = "3.2"; Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/13/2006 5:15 AM: > I'd prefer to remove all the existing @authors tags, in fact the > "authors" of a file are determined by the svn log history. > I'd also remove all the @version and $rev tags as well... but maybe we > should start a vote on this subject. > > Jacopo > > > Christian Geisert wrote: >> Scott Gray schrieb: >>> Hi Jacopo >>> >>> Like I've said previously I'm happy to help with this, if it's ok >>> with you >>> I'll start with the applications folder? One question though, what >>> do i do >>> with these lines: >>> >>> Old Headers: >>> * @author David E. Jones ([hidden email]) >>> * @author Andy Zeneski ([hidden email]) >>> * @author Si Chen ([hidden email]) >>> * @version $Rev: 418498 $ >>> >>> New Headers: >>> * $Id: $ >>> >>> Do the author lines remain in place? And what goes on the $Id tags? >> >> The ASF board recommendation is to remove individual authors tag but >> it's up to the PMC to make the decision (to use author tags or not). >> >> See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107788069123268&w=2 >> for some more infomationan. >> > > |
In reply to this post by Christian Geisert
This is interesting and I agree with Christian.
I'd like to start a discussion (and after it probably also a vote) on this subject: "remove individual @author tag from source files". Jacopo Christian Geisert wrote: > > The ASF board recommendation is to remove individual authors tag but > it's up to the PMC to make the decision (to use author tags or not). > > See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107788069123268&w=2 > for some more infomationan. > |
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Scott,Jacopo,
Jacopo thx for your kind support. I would like to start this apache licence migration work from /applications/party component. Can i start my work on this ??? Regards Ashish Vijaywargiya Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: Ashish, I've added your name to the list of persons with an iCLa on file in the OFBiz page. About the work on license migration... maybe you could coordinate with Scott? I think he will start working on the application folder, so you could help him there or work on some components from the framework... Thanks, Jacopo Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > I applied for iCLA.It has been accepted by Apache Group. > I am also doing my work in ofbiz. > You can view my name on the following list: http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html#unlistedclas > I am also interested in this work of migration. > Will you assign me work or i will tell you about my interested component. > How could it be possible for me to introduce my name in your's list of collected iCLAs??? > > Thanks > Ashish Vijaywargiya > > Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hi all, > > the gathering of iCLAs from past and present contributors is mostly > completed now: we are waiting for the last three ones, that hopefully > will be sent soon. > > It is time to start to deal with the license change for all the OFBiz's > files. > > Help is needed here: > we have to put the Apache License header at the top of each and every > file in OFBiz (binary files excluded); the license headers for all the > types of files (xml, java, ftl, properties, bsh, html) are in > ofbiz/APACHE2_HEADER; these headers should replace the existing MIT > headers (if they are present). > Regexp, search&replace tools, perl scripts, etc... are all good, if you > are an expert and are willing to help, just drop a note and then, when > the work is completed, just send us a few patches (maybe one for the > applications and one for the framework). > > In the attached file you'll find some tools (in perl, python and java) > downloaded from the Apache site to migrate source files headers from the > Apache License 1.1 to Apache License 2.0... maybe they could be a good > starting point. > > PLEASE HELP, > > Jacopo > > > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |