InvoiceItemType both as seed and demo data?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

InvoiceItemType both as seed and demo data?

hans_bakker
Invoiceitemtype's and PaymentMethodType's are defined in :
AccountingTypeData.xml and in DemoGlSetupData.xml as seed AND demo data.

Looks like it should be deleted as seed?

however InvoiceItemTypeMap is seed only and need invoiceItemType?

any opinions?

Regards,
Hans
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: InvoiceItemType both as seed and demo data?

Malin Nicolas
I prefer keep on seed and use <delete> element on customer site data to
remove unneeded type.

But remove on demo :)

Nicolas

Le 22/05/2013 16:47, Hans Bakker a écrit :

> Invoiceitemtype's and PaymentMethodType's are defined in :
> AccountingTypeData.xml and in DemoGlSetupData.xml as seed AND demo data.
>
> Looks like it should be deleted as seed?
>
> however InvoiceItemTypeMap is seed only and need invoiceItemType?
>
> any opinions?
>
> Regards,
> Hans


--
Nicolas MALIN
Consultant
Tél : 06.17.66.40.06
Site projet : http://www.neogia.org/
-------
Société LibrenBerry
Tél : 02.48.02.56.12
Site : http://www.librenberry.net/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: InvoiceItemType both as seed and demo data?

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
I agree with Nicolas,

Without thinking much at it, just throwing a general rule: why removing types from seed? They can still be usefull.
I'd rather remove from demo since demo is a higher level than seed and can always relies on it

Jacques

From: "Nicolas Malin" <[hidden email]>

>I prefer keep on seed and use <delete> element on customer site data to
> remove unneeded type.
>
> But remove on demo :)
>
> Nicolas
>
> Le 22/05/2013 16:47, Hans Bakker a écrit :
>> Invoiceitemtype's and PaymentMethodType's are defined in :
>> AccountingTypeData.xml and in DemoGlSetupData.xml as seed AND demo data.
>>
>> Looks like it should be deleted as seed?
>>
>> however InvoiceItemTypeMap is seed only and need invoiceItemType?
>>
>> any opinions?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hans
>
>
> --
> Nicolas MALIN
> Consultant
> Tél : 06.17.66.40.06
> Site projet : http://www.neogia.org/
> -------
> Société LibrenBerry
> Tél : 02.48.02.56.12
> Site : http://www.librenberry.net/
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: InvoiceItemType both as seed and demo data?

hans_bakker
Jacques, Nicolas,

Did some investigation and I see I was mistaken, although they are in
both files, the fields are different: defined in seed data, and the
assignment to GLAccounts in the demo data....

so the system is fine as it is......

Regards,
Hans

On 05/22/2013 10:07 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> I agree with Nicolas,
> `
> Without thinking much at it, just throwing a general rule: why removing types from seed? They can still be usefull.
> I'd rather remove from demo since demo is a higher level than seed and can always relies on it
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Nicolas Malin" <[hidden email]>
>> I prefer keep on seed and use <delete> element on customer site data to
>> remove unneeded type.
>>
>> But remove on demo :)
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>> Le 22/05/2013 16:47, Hans Bakker a écrit :
>>> Invoiceitemtype's and PaymentMethodType's are defined in :
>>> AccountingTypeData.xml and in DemoGlSetupData.xml as seed AND demo data.
>>>
>>> Looks like it should be deleted as seed?
>>>
>>> however InvoiceItemTypeMap is seed only and need invoiceItemType?
>>>
>>> any opinions?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hans
>>
>> --
>> Nicolas MALIN
>> Consultant
>> Tél : 06.17.66.40.06
>> Site projet : http://www.neogia.org/
>> -------
>> Société LibrenBerry
>> Tél : 02.48.02.56.12
>> Site : http://www.librenberry.net/
>>