Hi,
is OFBiz really XHTML 1.0 valid? Catalog component ( https://demo904.ofbiz.org/catalog ) has 25 errors and 7 warnings <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fdemo904.ofbiz.org%">http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fdemo904.ofbiz.org% 2Fcatalog%2Fcontrol%2Flogin%2Fmain%3FUSERNAME%3Ddemoadmin%26PASSWORD% 3Dofbiz&charset=%28detect+automatically% 29&doctype=Inline&ss=1&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.654 Thanks for explanation :-) ya |
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
Thanks for explanation, but Amazon.com haven't this
https://demo904.ofbiz.org/images/valid-xhtml10.png on _every_ page. And catalog is part of ofbiz, it isn't 3rd party application deployed to OFBiz. I wondered why is logo "XHTML 1.0 valid" on XHTML 1.0 non-valid page creted by ofbiz team. ya Dňa St, 2009-06-24 o 10:33 -0700, John Hays napísal: > Ján, its as valid as you make it. The XHTML is generated by the > widgets, servlets, and ftl templates that go into the page. If the > programmer who put together the "demo" catalog did not create valid > XHTML, then it won't pass the validator. Clean HTML, XHTML, etc. is a > great goal, which can be achieved through diligence by the designers > and coders, but is rarely truly necessary from a pragmatic point of > view -- for example, try running Amazon's home page through the > validator, you will see over 1500 warnings and errors in their HTML, > or over 500 XHTML errors for Overstock.com. > > OFBiz provides the framework to create valid XHTML, but it is up to > the developer/implementor to make it so, the framework cannot force > good coding. > |
In reply to this post by Ján Valkovič
at the point that ofbiz put the compliance on the footer, I was.
However there has not been in real testing with all the commits and changes in the last few years. if this is a concern of your please feel free to contribute and effort towards that end. http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Contributors+Best+Practices Ján Valkovič sent the following on 6/24/2009 9:25 AM: > Hi, > is OFBiz really XHTML 1.0 valid? Catalog component > ( https://demo904.ofbiz.org/catalog ) has 25 errors and 7 warnings > <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fdemo904.ofbiz.org%">http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fdemo904.ofbiz.org% > 2Fcatalog%2Fcontrol%2Flogin%2Fmain%3FUSERNAME%3Ddemoadmin%26PASSWORD% > 3Dofbiz&charset=%28detect+automatically% > 29&doctype=Inline&ss=1&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.654 > > Thanks for explanation :-) > ya > > > -- BJ Freeman http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation http://bjfreeman.elance.com http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro Systems Integrator. |
In reply to this post by Ján Valkovič
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
Thanks John. Very well put. -David On Jun 24, 2009, at 12:50 PM, John Hays wrote: > The point is valid that a page that wears the badge should have been > tested to make sure that it still complies. However, this is an open > source, community supported, project -- not a shrink wrapped > commercial product with a large marketing and legal department > insuring that enough disclaimers are put on everything that the > company can't be held to a standard. > > If someone is concerned about the generated XHTML enough to go in > and create a patch to fix the issues, I'm sure the committers will > review it and if it doesn't break something else, add it to the > project. The OFBiz team is everyone in the community, we can all > work to make it better. I, for example, found some extraneous > attributes in some tags in the demo, and a committer looked into it > right away. If we cannot figure out how to "fix" an issue we see, > then we can bring it to the community, as you did, and maybe someone > else will pick up the torch and run with it. > > Demo pages are "proof of concept", production is what we make it. > > On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:31 AM, Ján Valkovič wrote: > >> Thanks for explanation, but Amazon.com haven't this >> https://demo904.ofbiz.org/images/valid-xhtml10.png on _every_ page. >> And >> catalog is part of ofbiz, it isn't 3rd party application deployed to >> OFBiz. I wondered why is logo "XHTML 1.0 valid" on XHTML 1.0 non- >> valid >> page creted by ofbiz team. >> >> ya >> >> Dňa St, 2009-06-24 o 10:33 -0700, John Hays napísal: >>> Ján, its as valid as you make it. The XHTML is generated by the >>> widgets, servlets, and ftl templates that go into the page. If the >>> programmer who put together the "demo" catalog did not create valid >>> XHTML, then it won't pass the validator. Clean HTML, XHTML, etc. >>> is a >>> great goal, which can be achieved through diligence by the designers >>> and coders, but is rarely truly necessary from a pragmatic point of >>> view -- for example, try running Amazon's home page through the >>> validator, you will see over 1500 warnings and errors in their HTML, >>> or over 500 XHTML errors for Overstock.com. >>> >>> OFBiz provides the framework to create valid XHTML, but it is up to >>> the developer/implementor to make it so, the framework cannot force >>> good coding. >>> >> >> >> > > John |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |