JackRabbit branch

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi,

I believe the JackRabbit branch is now completely unmergeable. I suggest that we archive it in Jira. It adds only confusion there. Same for the the
Boostrap theme?

I see no problems keeping all branches even old in the repo, it does annoy there.

Thanks

Jacques

[Pierre Smits]

Your assumption and suggestion applies to many more branches than just the
2 mentioned, but only 2 were registered in JIRA.

What does that 'archive it in Jira' entail? Will associated issues be
removed from JIRA?

Best regards,


Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I believe the JackRabbit branch is now completely unmergeable. I suggest
> that we archive it in Jira. It adds only confusion there. Same for the the
> Boostrap theme?
>
> I see no problems keeping all branches even old in the repo, it does annoy
> there.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Nope, simply that we will no longer see the JackRabbit branch when filling the Fix Version/s field, which is disturbing, same for Bootstrap

Jacques


Le 18/07/2016 à 11:31, Pierre Smits a écrit :

> Your assumption and suggestion applies to many more branches than just the
> 2 mentioned, but only 2 were registered in JIRA.
>
> What does that 'archive it in Jira' entail? Will associated issues be
> removed from JIRA?
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I believe the JackRabbit branch is now completely unmergeable. I suggest
>> that we archive it in Jira. It adds only confusion there. Same for the the
>> Boostrap theme?
>>
>> I see no problems keeping all branches even old in the repo, it does annoy
>> there.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>

[taher]

+1

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Nope, simply that we will no longer see the JackRabbit branch when filling
> the Fix Version/s field, which is disturbing, same for Bootstrap
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
> Le 18/07/2016 à 11:31, Pierre Smits a écrit :
>
>> Your assumption and suggestion applies to many more branches than just the
>> 2 mentioned, but only 2 were registered in JIRA.
>>
>> What does that 'archive it in Jira' entail? Will associated issues be
>> removed from JIRA?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> Pierre Smits
>>
>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
>> OFBiz based solutions & services
>>
>> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
>> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I believe the JackRabbit branch is now completely unmergeable. I suggest
>>> that we archive it in Jira. It adds only confusion there. Same for the
>>> the
>>> Boostrap theme?
>>>
>>> I see no problems keeping all branches even old in the repo, it does
>>> annoy
>>> there.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

[Pierre Smits]

Hi Jacques,

If that is the case, I don't see any reason to object.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Nope, simply that we will no longer see the JackRabbit branch when
> filling
> > the Fix Version/s field, which is disturbing, same for Bootstrap
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> >
> >
> > Le 18/07/2016 à 11:31, Pierre Smits a écrit :
> >
> >> Your assumption and suggestion applies to many more branches than just
> the
> >> 2 mentioned, but only 2 were registered in JIRA.
> >>
> >> What does that 'archive it in Jira' entail? Will associated issues be
> >> removed from JIRA?
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >>
> >> Pierre Smits
> >>
> >> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> >> OFBiz based solutions & services
> >>
> >> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> >> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I believe the JackRabbit branch is now completely unmergeable. I
> suggest
> >>> that we archive it in Jira. It adds only confusion there. Same for the
> >>> the
> >>> Boostrap theme?
> >>>
> >>> I see no problems keeping all branches even old in the repo, it does
> >>> annoy
> >>> there.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Done

Jacques


Le 18/07/2016 à 12:09, Pierre Smits a écrit :

> Hi Jacques,
>
> If that is the case, I don't see any reason to object.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Nope, simply that we will no longer see the JackRabbit branch when
>> filling
>>> the Fix Version/s field, which is disturbing, same for Bootstrap
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 18/07/2016 à 11:31, Pierre Smits a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Your assumption and suggestion applies to many more branches than just
>> the
>>>> 2 mentioned, but only 2 were registered in JIRA.
>>>>
>>>> What does that 'archive it in Jira' entail? Will associated issues be
>>>> removed from JIRA?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pierre Smits
>>>>
>>>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
>>>> OFBiz based solutions & services
>>>>
>>>> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
>>>> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I believe the JackRabbit branch is now completely unmergeable. I
>> suggest
>>>>> that we archive it in Jira. It adds only confusion there. Same for the
>>>>> the
>>>>> Boostrap theme?
>>>>>
>>>>> I see no problems keeping all branches even old in the repo, it does
>>>>> annoy
>>>>> there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>

[Michael Brohl-3]

+1, Jacques

Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH
www.ecomify.de


Am 18.07.16 um 11:17 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:

> Hi,
>
> I believe the JackRabbit branch is now completely unmergeable. I
> suggest that we archive it in Jira. It adds only confusion there. Same
> for the the Boostrap theme?
>
> I see no problems keeping all branches even old in the repo, it does
> annoy there.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>