Adrian, David, thanks for your input, I've made the relevant change in
rev. 678116
Regards
Scott
2008/7/19 David Jones <
[hidden email]>:
>
> Well, when you put it that way...
>
> Yes I think we should change the behavior and have it set the value to null if the list is null or empty. That seems totally reasonable.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:23:38 +1200, "Scott Gray" <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I noticed the <first-from-list> element does nothing if the list is
>> either null or empty (i.e. the field retains it's current value), I
>> was expecting that it would set the field to null. I would like to do
>> one of two things, either change the behaviour of the element or
>> document the element so that people are aware of its current
>> behaviour.
>>
>> Any opinions on which?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Scott
>
>