New branch is now available for upcoming releases of 10.04 series

[Bruno Busco]

I think it's better no tooltip.

2010/5/2 chris snow <[hidden email]>

> Shall we provide no tooltip if the text isn't provided? Or, even a string
> "help not found - please write me!"?
>
> On 2 May 2010 12:22, "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> To me it looked like a bug, I'm guessing it could look like the same to a
> potential user.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
>
> On 2/05/2010, at 6:15 PM, Christopher Snow wrote:
>
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > That's because a default resour...
>

[Vikas Mayur-2]

Do we need any formal vote procedure to conclude whether we should backport
unit test or not?

Regards
Vikas

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> This looks like a good idea to me and I don't see why we should not allow
> to backport automated tests.
>
> Jacopo
>
> On May 1, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jacopo for all of your hard work to make it happen.
> >
> > Btw I am not sure if this is a good question to you (and others of
> course)
> > about commit policy to the release branch.
> >
> > We all know that the main idea behind the release branch is to provide a
> > more stable version of OFBiz.
> >
> > I was just wondering if we could also change the commit policy to back
> port
> > unit test besides bug fixes.
> >
> > This way there would be more code coverage with the additional unit tests
> > resulted by backporting to the release branch.
> >
> > I am sorry if this has been already discussed in past.
> >
> > Regards
> > Vikas
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> The new release branch "10.04" is now available here:
> >>
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release10.04
> >>
> >> Checkout instructions are, as usual, here:
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Source+Repository+and+Access
> >>
> >> There is now a new version "Release Branch 10.04" in Jira that can be
> used
> >> to mark Jira tickets that contain patches (or bug reports) specifically
> >> addressed to this branch.
> >>
> >> We will only accept bug fixes for this branch and we will issue official
> >> releases over time (tentatively every quarter).
> >>
> >> To the whole community: please help to stabilize the branch with tests,
> bug
> >> reports and fixes; the quality of the upcoming releases in the 10.04
> series
> >> will be determined by the activity and contribution of the community.
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >>
> >> Jacopo
> >>
> >>
>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

I don't think so, tests could be backported IMO. Maybe discussed for each case on dev ML before?

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]>

> Do we need any formal vote procedure to conclude whether we should backport
> unit test or not?
>
> Regards
> Vikas
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> This looks like a good idea to me and I don't see why we should not allow
>> to backport automated tests.
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> On May 1, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Jacopo for all of your hard work to make it happen.
>> >
>> > Btw I am not sure if this is a good question to you (and others of
>> course)
>> > about commit policy to the release branch.
>> >
>> > We all know that the main idea behind the release branch is to provide a
>> > more stable version of OFBiz.
>> >
>> > I was just wondering if we could also change the commit policy to back
>> port
>> > unit test besides bug fixes.
>> >
>> > This way there would be more code coverage with the additional unit tests
>> > resulted by backporting to the release branch.
>> >
>> > I am sorry if this has been already discussed in past.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Vikas
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
>> > [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The new release branch "10.04" is now available here:
>> >>
>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release10.04
>> >>
>> >> Checkout instructions are, as usual, here:
>> >>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Source+Repository+and+Access
>> >>
>> >> There is now a new version "Release Branch 10.04" in Jira that can be
>> used
>> >> to mark Jira tickets that contain patches (or bug reports) specifically
>> >> addressed to this branch.
>> >>
>> >> We will only accept bug fixes for this branch and we will issue official
>> >> releases over time (tentatively every quarter).
>> >>
>> >> To the whole community: please help to stabilize the branch with tests,
>> bug
>> >> reports and fixes; the quality of the upcoming releases in the 10.04
>> series
>> >> will be determined by the activity and contribution of the community.
>> >>
>> >> Kind regards,
>> >>
>> >> Jacopo
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>

[Scott Gray-2]

I don't think anybody is going to be against adding tests and it shouldn't need to be discussed first.

BTW, we still need to ask Infra to get buildbot running the 10.04 tests if anyone wants to volunteer.

Regards
Scott

On 3/05/2010, at 10:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> I don't think so, tests could be backported IMO. Maybe discussed for each case on dev ML before?
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]>
>> Do we need any formal vote procedure to conclude whether we should backport
>> unit test or not?
>> Regards
>> Vikas
>> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>> This looks like a good idea to me and I don't see why we should not allow
>>> to backport automated tests.
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> On May 1, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks Jacopo for all of your hard work to make it happen.
>>> >
>>> > Btw I am not sure if this is a good question to you (and others of
>>> course)
>>> > about commit policy to the release branch.
>>> >
>>> > We all know that the main idea behind the release branch is to provide a
>>> > more stable version of OFBiz.
>>> >
>>> > I was just wondering if we could also change the commit policy to back
>>> port
>>> > unit test besides bug fixes.
>>> >
>>> > This way there would be more code coverage with the additional unit tests
>>> > resulted by backporting to the release branch.
>>> >
>>> > I am sorry if this has been already discussed in past.
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Vikas
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
>>> > [hidden email]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> The new release branch "10.04" is now available here:
>>> >>
>>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release10.04
>>> >>
>>> >> Checkout instructions are, as usual, here:
>>> >>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Source+Repository+and+Access
>>> >>
>>> >> There is now a new version "Release Branch 10.04" in Jira that can be
>>> used
>>> >> to mark Jira tickets that contain patches (or bug reports) specifically
>>> >> addressed to this branch.
>>> >>
>>> >> We will only accept bug fixes for this branch and we will issue official
>>> >> releases over time (tentatively every quarter).
>>> >>
>>> >> To the whole community: please help to stabilize the branch with tests,
>>> bug
>>> >> reports and fixes; the quality of the upcoming releases in the 10.04
>>> series
>>> >> will be determined by the activity and contribution of the community.
>>> >>
>>> >> Kind regards,
>>> >>
>>> >> Jacopo
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

[Vikas Mayur-3]

Yeah it looks evident from the discussion that most of the people are  
in favor of backporting unit tests (Thanks Everyone!)

and it is good to assume that one can backport a unit test from now  
onwards, right?

I am sorry but I thought generally changes in policy are concluded  
through voting.

Regards
Vikas

On May 3, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Scott Gray wrote:

> I don't think anybody is going to be against adding tests and it  
> shouldn't need to be discussed first.
>
> BTW, we still need to ask Infra to get buildbot running the 10.04  
> tests if anyone wants to volunteer.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> On 3/05/2010, at 10:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> I don't think so, tests could be backported IMO. Maybe discussed  
>> for each case on dev ML before?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]>
>>> Do we need any formal vote procedure to conclude whether we should  
>>> backport
>>> unit test or not?
>>> Regards
>>> Vikas
>>> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> This looks like a good idea to me and I don't see why we should  
>>>> not allow
>>>> to backport automated tests.
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>> On May 1, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Jacopo for all of your hard work to make it happen.
>>>>>
>>>>> Btw I am not sure if this is a good question to you (and others of
>>>> course)
>>>>> about commit policy to the release branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> We all know that the main idea behind the release branch is to  
>>>>> provide a
>>>>> more stable version of OFBiz.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was just wondering if we could also change the commit policy  
>>>>> to back
>>>> port
>>>>> unit test besides bug fixes.
>>>>>
>>>>> This way there would be more code coverage with the additional  
>>>>> unit tests
>>>>> resulted by backporting to the release branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am sorry if this has been already discussed in past.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Vikas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The new release branch "10.04" is now available here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release10.04
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Checkout instructions are, as usual, here:
>>>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Source+Repository+and+Access
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is now a new version "Release Branch 10.04" in Jira that  
>>>>>> can be
>>>> used
>>>>>> to mark Jira tickets that contain patches (or bug reports)  
>>>>>> specifically
>>>>>> addressed to this branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We will only accept bug fixes for this branch and we will issue  
>>>>>> official
>>>>>> releases over time (tentatively every quarter).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To the whole community: please help to stabilize the branch  
>>>>>> with tests,
>>>> bug
>>>>>> reports and fixes; the quality of the upcoming releases in the  
>>>>>> 10.04
>>>> series
>>>>>> will be determined by the activity and contribution of the  
>>>>>> community.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>