*Rational:*
The special purpose/jetty component has been intended as a specific variation on the special purpose/appserver component that we decided to move to OFBiz Attic recently. As this is a specific purpose component that shares the same faith as appserver (with respect to working with current versions and no contributor feeling the itch to improve) it is time to decide whether or not we keep this in our trunk. *Proposal:* - Have this special purpose/jetty component moved from trunk to attic, and - don't include it in future releases (including the upcoming r14.x branch release r14.12.01) For this proposal the normal 72 hour rule applies. Best regards Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com |
Administrator
|
+1
Jacques Le 23/03/2015 12:23, Pierre Smits a écrit : > *Rational:* > The special purpose/jetty component has been intended as a specific > variation on the special purpose/appserver component that we decided to > move to OFBiz Attic recently. As this is a specific purpose component that > shares the same faith as appserver (with respect to working with current > versions and no contributor feeling the itch to improve) it is time to > decide whether or not we keep this in our trunk. > > *Proposal:* > > - Have this special purpose/jetty component moved from trunk to attic, > and > - don't include it in future releases (including the upcoming r14.x > branch release r14.12.01) > > For this proposal the normal 72 hour rule applies. > > Best regards > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > |
In reply to this post by Pierre Smits
+1
Michael Brohl www.ecomify.de Am 23.03.15 um 12:23 schrieb Pierre Smits: > *Rational:* > The special purpose/jetty component has been intended as a specific > variation on the special purpose/appserver component that we decided to > move to OFBiz Attic recently. As this is a specific purpose component that > shares the same faith as appserver (with respect to working with current > versions and no contributor feeling the itch to improve) it is time to > decide whether or not we keep this in our trunk. > > *Proposal:* > > - Have this special purpose/jetty component moved from trunk to attic, > and > - don't include it in future releases (including the upcoming r14.x > branch release r14.12.01) > > For this proposal the normal 72 hour rule applies. > > Best regards > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > |
In reply to this post by Pierre Smits
+1
Gil On 23/03/2015 12:23, Pierre Smits wrote: > *Rational:* > The special purpose/jetty component has been intended as a specific > variation on the special purpose/appserver component that we decided to > move to OFBiz Attic recently. As this is a specific purpose component that > shares the same faith as appserver (with respect to working with current > versions and no contributor feeling the itch to improve) it is time to > decide whether or not we keep this in our trunk. > > *Proposal:* > > - Have this special purpose/jetty component moved from trunk to attic, > and > - don't include it in future releases (including the upcoming r14.x > branch release r14.12.01) > > For this proposal the normal 72 hour rule applies. > > Best regards > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > |
In reply to this post by Pierre Smits
+1
Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 3/23/2015 11:23 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > *Rational:* > The special purpose/jetty component has been intended as a specific > variation on the special purpose/appserver component that we decided to > move to OFBiz Attic recently. As this is a specific purpose component that > shares the same faith as appserver (with respect to working with current > versions and no contributor feeling the itch to improve) it is time to > decide whether or not we keep this in our trunk. > > *Proposal:* > > - Have this special purpose/jetty component moved from trunk to attic, > and > - don't include it in future releases (including the upcoming r14.x > branch release r14.12.01) > > For this proposal the normal 72 hour rule applies. > > Best regards > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > |
In reply to this post by Pierre Smits
+1
Le 23/03/2015 12:23, Pierre Smits a écrit : > *Rational:* > The special purpose/jetty component has been intended as a specific > variation on the special purpose/appserver component that we decided to > move to OFBiz Attic recently. As this is a specific purpose component that > shares the same faith as appserver (with respect to working with current > versions and no contributor feeling the itch to improve) it is time to > decide whether or not we keep this in our trunk. > > *Proposal:* > > - Have this special purpose/jetty component moved from trunk to attic, > and > - don't include it in future releases (including the upcoming r14.x > branch release r14.12.01) > > For this proposal the normal 72 hour rule applies. > > Best regards > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > |
In reply to this post by Pierre Smits
+1
Thanks & Regards — Deepak Dixit > On Mar 23, 2015, at 4:53 PM, Pierre Smits <[hidden email]> wrote: > > *Rational:* > The special purpose/jetty component has been intended as a specific > variation on the special purpose/appserver component that we decided to > move to OFBiz Attic recently. As this is a specific purpose component that > shares the same faith as appserver (with respect to working with current > versions and no contributor feeling the itch to improve) it is time to > decide whether or not we keep this in our trunk. > > *Proposal:* > > - Have this special purpose/jetty component moved from trunk to attic, > and > - don't include it in future releases (including the upcoming r14.x > branch release r14.12.01) > > For this proposal the normal 72 hour rule applies. > > Best regards > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com |
In reply to this post by Pierre Smits
+1
Jacopo PS: a small clarification: the "jetty" component, rather than being a variation of the "appserver" component, is an alternative to the "catalina" component. On Mar 23, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Pierre Smits <[hidden email]> wrote: > *Rational:* > The special purpose/jetty component has been intended as a specific > variation on the special purpose/appserver component that we decided to > move to OFBiz Attic recently. As this is a specific purpose component that > shares the same faith as appserver (with respect to working with current > versions and no contributor feeling the itch to improve) it is time to > decide whether or not we keep this in our trunk. > > *Proposal:* > > - Have this special purpose/jetty component moved from trunk to attic, > and > - don't include it in future releases (including the upcoming r14.x > branch release r14.12.01) > > For this proposal the normal 72 hour rule applies. > > Best regards > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com |
Thanks for the clarification Jacopo. I would say another reason to have
descriptive pages per component as described in issue OFBIZ-5838 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5838>. Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < [hidden email]> wrote: > +1 > > Jacopo > > PS: a small clarification: the "jetty" component, rather than being a > variation of the "appserver" component, is an alternative to the "catalina" > component. > > On Mar 23, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Pierre Smits <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > *Rational:* > > The special purpose/jetty component has been intended as a specific > > variation on the special purpose/appserver component that we decided to > > move to OFBiz Attic recently. As this is a specific purpose component > that > > shares the same faith as appserver (with respect to working with current > > versions and no contributor feeling the itch to improve) it is time to > > decide whether or not we keep this in our trunk. > > > > *Proposal:* > > > > - Have this special purpose/jetty component moved from trunk to attic, > > and > > - don't include it in future releases (including the upcoming r14.x > > branch release r14.12.01) > > > > For this proposal the normal 72 hour rule applies. > > > > Best regards > > > > Pierre Smits > > > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > > Based Manufacturing, Professional > > Services and Retail & Trade > > http://www.orrtiz.com > > |
Hi all,
Thanks for the votes. This proposal passed, according to following results: - Binding: 5 positive (+1) votes (Adrian, Deepak, Jacopo, Jacques and Nicolas), 0 negative (-1) votes, 0 neutral (+0) votes - Non-Binding: 2 positive (+1) votes (Michael and), 0 negative (-1) votes, 0 neutral (+0) votes I will create an appropriate JIRA issue to track progress moving the special purpose/appserver component from trunk to attic. This will enable us to include it in release notes. Thank you for your participation. Best regards Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Pierre Smits <[hidden email]> wrote: > Thanks for the clarification Jacopo. I would say another reason to have > descriptive pages per component as described in issue OFBIZ-5838 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5838>. > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Jacopo >> >> PS: a small clarification: the "jetty" component, rather than being a >> variation of the "appserver" component, is an alternative to the "catalina" >> component. >> >> On Mar 23, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Pierre Smits <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >> > *Rational:* >> > The special purpose/jetty component has been intended as a specific >> > variation on the special purpose/appserver component that we decided to >> > move to OFBiz Attic recently. As this is a specific purpose component >> that >> > shares the same faith as appserver (with respect to working with current >> > versions and no contributor feeling the itch to improve) it is time to >> > decide whether or not we keep this in our trunk. >> > >> > *Proposal:* >> > >> > - Have this special purpose/jetty component moved from trunk to attic, >> > and >> > - don't include it in future releases (including the upcoming r14.x >> > branch release r14.12.01) >> > >> > For this proposal the normal 72 hour rule applies. >> > >> > Best regards >> > >> > Pierre Smits >> > >> > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >> > Services & Solutions for Cloud- >> > Based Manufacturing, Professional >> > Services and Retail & Trade >> > http://www.orrtiz.com >> >> > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |