Jacques, this is what I'm thinking:
1. SVN export -- I'm not a big fan of the export for just the reason you mentioned -- they'd need to redownload the whole thing to start working directly from it -- I think that's a bigger pain than having the SVN files in there. 2. Filesize - I'll put that on there immediately 3. Version Number -- Let's add that to the filename for now -- Did you have something else in mind? 4. Text -- Fixed per Jacques instructions Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 On Jun 18, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > I prefer the 1st if it's easy to set :o) > I tested (only launched and opened front and back on Windows), not > surprinsgly they work well both (release and trunk) > BTW I see that we do an svn co instead of an svn export Jacopo > suggested (pro : less files and space from 117MB to 95 for trunk for > instance, cons : have to redo an svn co after if willing to pursuie > with OFBiz). What to you think about it folks ? > > I propose to add something like "Apache OFBiz trunk version" like > we did for release. Even without the real svn version number we will > have at least this information (maybe at this stage on the build > server it's possible to add the svn version ?) > > Jacques > > From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >> I will like the second option i.e "if we should simply add it to the >> "Nightly Builds, What Do I Get?" ". >> >> -- >> Ashish >> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Tim Ruppert <[hidden email] >> > >> wrote: >> >>> We can do whatever you like - if you just want it to show the size >>> of each >>> of the files, we can do that - or if we should simply add it to >>> the "Nightly >>> Builds, What Do I Get?" section. Let me know the preference and >>> I"ll get it >>> in there. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tim >>> -- >>> Tim Ruppert >>> HotWax Media >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> >>> o:801.649.6594 >>> f:801.649.6595 >>> >>> >>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:01 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>> >>> Jacques , >>>> >>>> (just telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) >>>>>> >>>>> Adding the details about the external jar files will be good to >>>>> put >>>> altogether. >>>> The size of both are about 100MB (External jars size included in >>>> the >>>> project >>>> is around 40MB or 50MB whatever it is) >>>> >>>> Let's see what other has to say .... its my own wish :-). >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ashish >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Tim, >>>>> >>>>> That's great. Could it be possible to have some words about the >>>>> size >>>>> (just >>>>> telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) ? >>>>> >>>>> I will try to test them both today and will update wiki >>>>> accordingly. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>>> >>>>> Just so that everyone knows, the build area is ready now and is >>>>>> accessible from the ofbiz.apache.org home page. I will post >>>>>> another >>>>>> email out to everyone whenever everyone's had a chance to test >>>>>> out the >>>>>> results. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>> >>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> > smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
Administrator
|
Tim,
First of all thanks for you work on this. I'm sure it's not as easy as it may look from outside. From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> > Jacques, this is what I'm thinking: > > 1. SVN export > -- I'm not a big fan of the export for just the reason you mentioned -- they'd need to redownload the whole thing to start > working directly from it -- I think that's a bigger pain than having the SVN files in there. Maybe we could wait for other opinion, I can't see a problem with some more MB, it's not a big cons argument and will be less and less. I'm just curious of Jacopo's thought/(arguments maybe) about that. > 2. Filesize - I'll put that on there immediately +1 > 3. Version Number > -- Let's add that to the filename for now +1 > -- Did you have something else in mind? Something very simple (harcoded) as in footer.ftl files in release4.0 TIA Jacques > 4. Text > -- Fixed per Jacques instructions > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > > On Jun 18, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> I prefer the 1st if it's easy to set :o) >> I tested (only launched and opened front and back on Windows), not surprinsgly they work well both (release and trunk) >> BTW I see that we do an svn co instead of an svn export Jacopo suggested (pro : less files and space from 117MB to 95 for trunk >> for instance, cons : have to redo an svn co after if willing to pursuie with OFBiz). What to you think about it folks ? >> >> I propose to add something like "Apache OFBiz trunk version" like we did for release. Even without the real svn version number >> we will have at least this information (maybe at this stage on the build server it's possible to add the svn version ?) >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>> I will like the second option i.e "if we should simply add it to the >>> "Nightly Builds, What Do I Get?" ". >>> >>> -- >>> Ashish >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Tim Ruppert <[hidden email] >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We can do whatever you like - if you just want it to show the size of each >>>> of the files, we can do that - or if we should simply add it to the "Nightly >>>> Builds, What Do I Get?" section. Let me know the preference and I"ll get it >>>> in there. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Tim >>>> -- >>>> Tim Ruppert >>>> HotWax Media >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> >>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:01 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>>> >>>> Jacques , >>>>> >>>>> (just telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) >>>>>>> >>>>>> Adding the details about the external jar files will be good to put >>>>> altogether. >>>>> The size of both are about 100MB (External jars size included in the >>>>> project >>>>> is around 40MB or 50MB whatever it is) >>>>> >>>>> Let's see what other has to say .... its my own wish :-). >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ashish >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Tim, >>>>>> >>>>>> That's great. Could it be possible to have some words about the size >>>>>> (just >>>>>> telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) ? >>>>>> >>>>>> I will try to test them both today and will update wiki accordingly. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>>>> >>>>>> Just so that everyone knows, the build area is ready now and is >>>>>>> accessible from the ofbiz.apache.org home page. I will post another >>>>>>> email out to everyone whenever everyone's had a chance to test out the >>>>>>> results. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> > > |
Inline
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Tim, > > First of all thanks for you work on this. I'm sure it's not as easy > as it may look from outside. > > From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >> Jacques, this is what I'm thinking: >> >> 1. SVN export >> -- I'm not a big fan of the export for just the reason you >> mentioned -- they'd need to redownload the whole thing to start >> working directly from it -- I think that's a bigger pain than >> having the SVN files in there. > > Maybe we could wait for other opinion, I can't see a problem with > some more MB, it's not a big cons argument and will be less and > less. I'm just curious of Jacopo's thought/(arguments maybe) about > that. >> 2. Filesize - I'll put that on there immediately > > +1 > >> 3. Version Number >> -- Let's add that to the filename for now > > +1 > >> -- Did you have something else in mind? > > Something very simple (harcoded) as in footer.ftl files in release4.0 anything, that we'll have an updated footer.ftl with incorrect information going forward - which in my opinion is a bad idea. Thoughts? > > > TIA > > Jacques > >> 4. Text >> -- Fixed per Jacques instructions >> >> Cheers, >> Tim >> -- >> Tim Ruppert >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> o:801.649.6594 >> f:801.649.6595 >> >> >> On Jun 18, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>> I prefer the 1st if it's easy to set :o) >>> I tested (only launched and opened front and back on Windows), >>> not surprinsgly they work well both (release and trunk) >>> BTW I see that we do an svn co instead of an svn export Jacopo >>> suggested (pro : less files and space from 117MB to 95 for trunk >>> for instance, cons : have to redo an svn co after if willing to >>> pursuie with OFBiz). What to you think about it folks ? >>> >>> I propose to add something like "Apache OFBiz trunk version" >>> like we did for release. Even without the real svn version number >>> we will have at least this information (maybe at this stage on >>> the build server it's possible to add the svn version ?) >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>> I will like the second option i.e "if we should simply add it to >>>> the >>>> "Nightly Builds, What Do I Get?" ". >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ashish >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Tim Ruppert <[hidden email] >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We can do whatever you like - if you just want it to show the >>>>> size of each >>>>> of the files, we can do that - or if we should simply add it to >>>>> the "Nightly >>>>> Builds, What Do I Get?" section. Let me know the preference >>>>> and I"ll get it >>>>> in there. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Tim >>>>> -- >>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>> HotWax Media >>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>> >>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:01 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Jacques , >>>>>> >>>>>> (just telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Adding the details about the external jar files will be good >>>>>>> to put >>>>>> altogether. >>>>>> The size of both are about 100MB (External jars size included >>>>>> in the >>>>>> project >>>>>> is around 40MB or 50MB whatever it is) >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's see what other has to say .... its my own wish :-). >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ashish >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Tim, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's great. Could it be possible to have some words about >>>>>>> the size >>>>>>> (just >>>>>>> telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will try to test them both today and will update wiki >>>>>>> accordingly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just so that everyone knows, the build area is ready now and is >>>>>>>> accessible from the ofbiz.apache.org home page. I will post >>>>>>>> another >>>>>>>> email out to everyone whenever everyone's had a chance to >>>>>>>> test out the >>>>>>>> results. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
Administrator
|
From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]>
>>> -- Did you have something else in mind? >> >> Something very simple (harcoded) as in footer.ftl files in release4.0 > > The only problem is that since this isn't based upon SVN keywords or anything, that we'll have an updated footer.ftl with > incorrect information going forward - which in my opinion is a bad idea. Thoughts? Yes you are right indeed, this would one more worry when launching a new release (I could note it somewhere but we can't rely on such a way of doing things, I agree)... OK forget it, except if someone has a better idea ? Jacques >> >> >> TIA >> >> Jacques >> >>> 4. Text >>> -- Fixed per Jacques instructions >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tim >>> -- >>> Tim Ruppert >>> HotWax Media >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> >>> o:801.649.6594 >>> f:801.649.6595 >>> >>> >>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>>> I prefer the 1st if it's easy to set :o) >>>> I tested (only launched and opened front and back on Windows), not surprinsgly they work well both (release and trunk) >>>> BTW I see that we do an svn co instead of an svn export Jacopo suggested (pro : less files and space from 117MB to 95 for >>>> trunk for instance, cons : have to redo an svn co after if willing to pursuie with OFBiz). What to you think about it folks >>>> ? >>>> >>>> I propose to add something like "Apache OFBiz trunk version" like we did for release. Even without the real svn version >>>> number we will have at least this information (maybe at this stage on the build server it's possible to add the svn version >>>> ?) >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>>> I will like the second option i.e "if we should simply add it to the >>>>> "Nightly Builds, What Do I Get?" ". >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ashish >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Tim Ruppert <[hidden email] >>>>> > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We can do whatever you like - if you just want it to show the size of each >>>>>> of the files, we can do that - or if we should simply add it to the "Nightly >>>>>> Builds, What Do I Get?" section. Let me know the preference and I"ll get it >>>>>> in there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>> >>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:01 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques , >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (just telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Adding the details about the external jar files will be good to put >>>>>>> altogether. >>>>>>> The size of both are about 100MB (External jars size included in the >>>>>>> project >>>>>>> is around 40MB or 50MB whatever it is) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let's see what other has to say .... its my own wish :-). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tim, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's great. Could it be possible to have some words about the size >>>>>>>> (just >>>>>>>> telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will try to test them both today and will update wiki accordingly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just so that everyone knows, the build area is ready now and is >>>>>>>>> accessible from the ofbiz.apache.org home page. I will post another >>>>>>>>> email out to everyone whenever everyone's had a chance to test out the >>>>>>>>> results. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > |
Everything's up there except the new filename with the SVN version
number in it - which will happen sometime later today. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>> -- Did you have something else in mind? >>> >>> Something very simple (harcoded) as in footer.ftl files in >>> release4.0 >> >> The only problem is that since this isn't based upon SVN keywords >> or anything, that we'll have an updated footer.ftl with incorrect >> information going forward - which in my opinion is a bad idea. >> Thoughts? > > Yes you are right indeed, this would one more worry when launching a > new release (I could note it somewhere but we can't rely on such a > way of doing things, I agree)... OK forget it, except if someone has > a better idea ? > > Jacques > >>> >>> >>> TIA >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>>> 4. Text >>>> -- Fixed per Jacques instructions >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Tim >>>> -- >>>> Tim Ruppert >>>> HotWax Media >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> >>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> >>>>> I prefer the 1st if it's easy to set :o) >>>>> I tested (only launched and opened front and back on Windows), >>>>> not surprinsgly they work well both (release and trunk) >>>>> BTW I see that we do an svn co instead of an svn export Jacopo >>>>> suggested (pro : less files and space from 117MB to 95 for >>>>> trunk for instance, cons : have to redo an svn co after if >>>>> willing to pursuie with OFBiz). What to you think about it >>>>> folks ? >>>>> >>>>> I propose to add something like "Apache OFBiz trunk version" >>>>> like we did for release. Even without the real svn version >>>>> number we will have at least this information (maybe at this >>>>> stage on the build server it's possible to add the svn >>>>> version ?) >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>>>> I will like the second option i.e "if we should simply add it >>>>>> to the >>>>>> "Nightly Builds, What Do I Get?" ". >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ashish >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Tim Ruppert <[hidden email] >>>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We can do whatever you like - if you just want it to show the >>>>>>> size of each >>>>>>> of the files, we can do that - or if we should simply add it >>>>>>> to the "Nightly >>>>>>> Builds, What Do I Get?" section. Let me know the preference >>>>>>> and I"ll get it >>>>>>> in there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:01 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques , >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (just telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Adding the details about the external jar files will be >>>>>>>>> good to put >>>>>>>> altogether. >>>>>>>> The size of both are about 100MB (External jars size >>>>>>>> included in the >>>>>>>> project >>>>>>>> is around 40MB or 50MB whatever it is) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let's see what other has to say .... its my own wish :-). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tim, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's great. Could it be possible to have some words about >>>>>>>>> the size >>>>>>>>> (just >>>>>>>>> telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I will try to test them both today and will update wiki >>>>>>>>> accordingly. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just so that everyone knows, the build area is ready now and >>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>> accessible from the ofbiz.apache.org home page. I will >>>>>>>>>> post another >>>>>>>>>> email out to everyone whenever everyone's had a chance to >>>>>>>>>> test out the >>>>>>>>>> results. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
Administrator
|
Thanks Tim,
I have updated the wiki accordingly. We should not get anymore any complaints :p Jacques From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> > Everything's up there except the new filename with the SVN version > number in it - which will happen sometime later today. > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > > On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>>> -- Did you have something else in mind? >>>> >>>> Something very simple (harcoded) as in footer.ftl files in >>>> release4.0 >>> >>> The only problem is that since this isn't based upon SVN keywords >>> or anything, that we'll have an updated footer.ftl with incorrect >>> information going forward - which in my opinion is a bad idea. >>> Thoughts? >> >> Yes you are right indeed, this would one more worry when launching a >> new release (I could note it somewhere but we can't rely on such a >> way of doing things, I agree)... OK forget it, except if someone has >> a better idea ? >> >> Jacques >> >>>> >>>> >>>> TIA >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>>> 4. Text >>>>> -- Fixed per Jacques instructions >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Tim >>>>> -- >>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>> HotWax Media >>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>> >>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I prefer the 1st if it's easy to set :o) >>>>>> I tested (only launched and opened front and back on Windows), >>>>>> not surprinsgly they work well both (release and trunk) >>>>>> BTW I see that we do an svn co instead of an svn export Jacopo >>>>>> suggested (pro : less files and space from 117MB to 95 for >>>>>> trunk for instance, cons : have to redo an svn co after if >>>>>> willing to pursuie with OFBiz). What to you think about it >>>>>> folks ? >>>>>> >>>>>> I propose to add something like "Apache OFBiz trunk version" >>>>>> like we did for release. Even without the real svn version >>>>>> number we will have at least this information (maybe at this >>>>>> stage on the build server it's possible to add the svn >>>>>> version ?) >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>> I will like the second option i.e "if we should simply add it >>>>>>> to the >>>>>>> "Nightly Builds, What Do I Get?" ". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Tim Ruppert <[hidden email] >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We can do whatever you like - if you just want it to show the >>>>>>>> size of each >>>>>>>> of the files, we can do that - or if we should simply add it >>>>>>>> to the "Nightly >>>>>>>> Builds, What Do I Get?" section. Let me know the preference >>>>>>>> and I"ll get it >>>>>>>> in there. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:01 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques , >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (just telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Adding the details about the external jar files will be >>>>>>>>>> good to put >>>>>>>>> altogether. >>>>>>>>> The size of both are about 100MB (External jars size >>>>>>>>> included in the >>>>>>>>> project >>>>>>>>> is around 40MB or 50MB whatever it is) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let's see what other has to say .... its my own wish :-). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tim, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's great. Could it be possible to have some words about >>>>>>>>>> the size >>>>>>>>>> (just >>>>>>>>>> telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I will try to test them both today and will update wiki >>>>>>>>>> accordingly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Just so that everyone knows, the build area is ready now and >>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>> accessible from the ofbiz.apache.org home page. I will >>>>>>>>>>> post another >>>>>>>>>>> email out to everyone whenever everyone's had a chance to >>>>>>>>>>> test out the >>>>>>>>>>> results. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > |
Inline
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Thanks Tim, > > I have updated the wiki accordingly. We should not get anymore any > complaints :p > I am sure instead getting complaints we will get suggestions :-) Correct Jacques ? -- Ashish > > > Jacques > > From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> > >> Everything's up there except the new filename with the SVN version number >> in it - which will happen sometime later today. >> >> Cheers, >> Tim >> -- >> Tim Ruppert >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> o:801.649.6594 >> f:801.649.6595 >> >> >> On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>> >>>> -- Did you have something else in mind? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Something very simple (harcoded) as in footer.ftl files in release4.0 >>>>> >>>> >>>> The only problem is that since this isn't based upon SVN keywords or >>>> anything, that we'll have an updated footer.ftl with incorrect >>>> information going forward - which in my opinion is a bad idea. Thoughts? >>>> >>> >>> Yes you are right indeed, this would one more worry when launching a new >>> release (I could note it somewhere but we can't rely on such a way of doing >>> things, I agree)... OK forget it, except if someone has a better idea ? >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> TIA >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> 4. Text >>>>>> -- Fixed per Jacques instructions >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>> >>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I prefer the 1st if it's easy to set :o) >>>>>>> I tested (only launched and opened front and back on Windows), not >>>>>>> surprinsgly they work well both (release and trunk) >>>>>>> BTW I see that we do an svn co instead of an svn export Jacopo >>>>>>> suggested (pro : less files and space from 117MB to 95 for trunk for >>>>>>> instance, cons : have to redo an svn co after if willing to pursuie with >>>>>>> OFBiz). What to you think about it folks ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I propose to add something like "Apache OFBiz trunk version" like >>>>>>> we did for release. Even without the real svn version number we will >>>>>>> have at least this information (maybe at this stage on the build server >>>>>>> it's possible to add the svn version ?) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will like the second option i.e "if we should simply add it to >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> "Nightly Builds, What Do I Get?" ". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Tim Ruppert < >>>>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We can do whatever you like - if you just want it to show the >>>>>>>>> size of each >>>>>>>>> of the files, we can do that - or if we should simply add it to >>>>>>>>> the "Nightly >>>>>>>>> Builds, What Do I Get?" section. Let me know the preference and >>>>>>>>> I"ll get it >>>>>>>>> in there. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:01 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jacques , >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (just telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Adding the details about the external jar files will be good >>>>>>>>>>> to put >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> altogether. >>>>>>>>>> The size of both are about 100MB (External jars size included in >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> project >>>>>>>>>> is around 40MB or 50MB whatever it is) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Let's see what other has to say .... its my own wish :-). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tim, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's great. Could it be possible to have some words about the >>>>>>>>>>> size >>>>>>>>>>> (just >>>>>>>>>>> telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) ? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I will try to test them both today and will update wiki >>>>>>>>>>> accordingly. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Just so that everyone knows, the build area is ready now and is >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> accessible from the ofbiz.apache.org home page. I will post >>>>>>>>>>>> another >>>>>>>>>>>> email out to everyone whenever everyone's had a chance to test >>>>>>>>>>>> out the >>>>>>>>>>>> results. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> |
Administrator
|
We may hope, yes.
Jacques From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> > Inline > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Thanks Tim, >> >> I have updated the wiki accordingly. We should not get anymore any >> complaints :p >> > > I am sure instead getting complaints we will get suggestions :-) > Correct Jacques ? > > -- > Ashish > > > >> >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >> >>> Everything's up there except the new filename with the SVN version number >>> in it - which will happen sometime later today. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tim >>> -- >>> Tim Ruppert >>> HotWax Media >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> >>> o:801.649.6594 >>> f:801.649.6595 >>> >>> >>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>> >>>>> -- Did you have something else in mind? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Something very simple (harcoded) as in footer.ftl files in release4.0 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The only problem is that since this isn't based upon SVN keywords or >>>>> anything, that we'll have an updated footer.ftl with incorrect >>>>> information going forward - which in my opinion is a bad idea. Thoughts? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes you are right indeed, this would one more worry when launching a new >>>> release (I could note it somewhere but we can't rely on such a way of doing >>>> things, I agree)... OK forget it, except if someone has a better idea ? >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> TIA >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> 4. Text >>>>>>> -- Fixed per Jacques instructions >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I prefer the 1st if it's easy to set :o) >>>>>>>> I tested (only launched and opened front and back on Windows), not >>>>>>>> surprinsgly they work well both (release and trunk) >>>>>>>> BTW I see that we do an svn co instead of an svn export Jacopo >>>>>>>> suggested (pro : less files and space from 117MB to 95 for trunk for >>>>>>>> instance, cons : have to redo an svn co after if willing to pursuie with >>>>>>>> OFBiz). What to you think about it folks ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I propose to add something like "Apache OFBiz trunk version" like >>>>>>>> we did for release. Even without the real svn version number we will >>>>>>>> have at least this information (maybe at this stage on the build server >>>>>>>> it's possible to add the svn version ?) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I will like the second option i.e "if we should simply add it to >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> "Nightly Builds, What Do I Get?" ". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Tim Ruppert < >>>>>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We can do whatever you like - if you just want it to show the >>>>>>>>>> size of each >>>>>>>>>> of the files, we can do that - or if we should simply add it to >>>>>>>>>> the "Nightly >>>>>>>>>> Builds, What Do I Get?" section. Let me know the preference and >>>>>>>>>> I"ll get it >>>>>>>>>> in there. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:01 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jacques , >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (just telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Adding the details about the external jar files will be good >>>>>>>>>>>> to put >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> altogether. >>>>>>>>>>> The size of both are about 100MB (External jars size included in >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> project >>>>>>>>>>> is around 40MB or 50MB whatever it is) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Let's see what other has to say .... its my own wish :-). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tim, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's great. Could it be possible to have some words about the >>>>>>>>>>>> size >>>>>>>>>>>> (just >>>>>>>>>>>> telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) ? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to test them both today and will update wiki >>>>>>>>>>>> accordingly. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just so that everyone knows, the build area is ready now and is >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> accessible from the ofbiz.apache.org home page. I will post >>>>>>>>>>>>> another >>>>>>>>>>>>> email out to everyone whenever everyone's had a chance to test >>>>>>>>>>>>> out the >>>>>>>>>>>>> results. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> > |
Administrator
|
Hey Ashish,
You were right, here is one : could we not use the work done in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700 ? I think, Tim is the man who can answer... Thanks Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > We may hope, yes. > > Jacques > > From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >> Inline >> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Tim, >>> >>> I have updated the wiki accordingly. We should not get anymore any >>> complaints :p >>> >> >> I am sure instead getting complaints we will get suggestions :-) >> Correct Jacques ? >> >> -- >> Ashish >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>> >>>> Everything's up there except the new filename with the SVN version number >>>> in it - which will happen sometime later today. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Tim >>>> -- >>>> Tim Ruppert >>>> HotWax Media >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> >>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> >>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>>> >>>>>> -- Did you have something else in mind? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Something very simple (harcoded) as in footer.ftl files in release4.0 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The only problem is that since this isn't based upon SVN keywords or >>>>>> anything, that we'll have an updated footer.ftl with incorrect >>>>>> information going forward - which in my opinion is a bad idea. Thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes you are right indeed, this would one more worry when launching a new >>>>> release (I could note it somewhere but we can't rely on such a way of doing >>>>> things, I agree)... OK forget it, except if someone has a better idea ? >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> TIA >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 4. Text >>>>>>>> -- Fixed per Jacques instructions >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I prefer the 1st if it's easy to set :o) >>>>>>>>> I tested (only launched and opened front and back on Windows), not >>>>>>>>> surprinsgly they work well both (release and trunk) >>>>>>>>> BTW I see that we do an svn co instead of an svn export Jacopo >>>>>>>>> suggested (pro : less files and space from 117MB to 95 for trunk for >>>>>>>>> instance, cons : have to redo an svn co after if willing to pursuie with >>>>>>>>> OFBiz). What to you think about it folks ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I propose to add something like "Apache OFBiz trunk version" like >>>>>>>>> we did for release. Even without the real svn version number we will >>>>>>>>> have at least this information (maybe at this stage on the build server >>>>>>>>> it's possible to add the svn version ?) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I will like the second option i.e "if we should simply add it to >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> "Nightly Builds, What Do I Get?" ". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Tim Ruppert < >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We can do whatever you like - if you just want it to show the >>>>>>>>>>> size of each >>>>>>>>>>> of the files, we can do that - or if we should simply add it to >>>>>>>>>>> the "Nightly >>>>>>>>>>> Builds, What Do I Get?" section. Let me know the preference and >>>>>>>>>>> I"ll get it >>>>>>>>>>> in there. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:01 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jacques , >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (just telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adding the details about the external jar files will be good >>>>>>>>>>>>> to put >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> altogether. >>>>>>>>>>>> The size of both are about 100MB (External jars size included in >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> project >>>>>>>>>>>> is around 40MB or 50MB whatever it is) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let's see what other has to say .... its my own wish :-). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tim, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great. Could it be possible to have some words about the >>>>>>>>>>>>> size >>>>>>>>>>>>> (just >>>>>>>>>>>>> telling people that's both are about 100MB to donwload) ? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to test them both today and will update wiki >>>>>>>>>>>>> accordingly. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just so that everyone knows, the build area is ready now and is >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> accessible from the ofbiz.apache.org home page. I will post >>>>>>>>>>>>>> another >>>>>>>>>>>>>> email out to everyone whenever everyone's had a chance to test >>>>>>>>>>>>>> out the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> results. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |