Login Management

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Login Management

Bruno Busco
Hi,
I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP application.
So I am going to use the framework alone and then build the custom
applications.

My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and relative groups, permissions
and roles.

From what I can see the UserLogin entity is defined by the framework itself,
so I imagine it will work without the Party component.
But I also see that the
https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is implemented in
the Party component.
Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to implement such basic Login entity
management screen?

Thank you,
Bruno
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Login Management

Adrian Crum
I agree that there needs to be a basic user login maintenance UI in the
framework. I'm about to post another message having to do with user
logins and permissions - maybe we can have a coordinated effort on that.

-Adrian

Bruno Busco wrote:

> Hi,
> I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP application.
> So I am going to use the framework alone and then build the custom
> applications.
>
> My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and relative groups, permissions
> and roles.
>
>>From what I can see the UserLogin entity is defined by the framework itself,
> so I imagine it will work without the Party component.
> But I also see that the
> https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is implemented in
> the Party component.
> Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to implement such basic Login entity
> management screen?
>
> Thank you,
> Bruno
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Login Management

Adrian Crum-2
In reply to this post by Bruno Busco
It would be nice to have all of the security related UI in the Webtools component, then have the Party component share those artifacts. So, the Party Security UI wouldn't change, but its security-related screens and forms and such would be kept in Webtools.

-Adrian


--- On Thu, 6/19/08, Bruno Busco <[hidden email]> wrote:

> From: Bruno Busco <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Login Management
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 10:27 AM
> Hi,
> I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP application.
> So I am going to use the framework alone and then build the
> custom
> applications.
>
> My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and relative
> groups, permissions
> and roles.
>
> From what I can see the UserLogin entity is defined by the
> framework itself,
> so I imagine it will work without the Party component.
> But I also see that the
> https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is
> implemented in
> the Party component.
> Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to implement such
> basic Login entity
> management screen?
>
> Thank you,
> Bruno


     
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Login Management

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Yes, it seems to go well with the framework split

Jacques

From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>

> It would be nice to have all of the security related UI in the Webtools component, then have the Party component share those
> artifacts. So, the Party Security UI wouldn't change, but its security-related screens and forms and such would be kept in
> Webtools.
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> --- On Thu, 6/19/08, Bruno Busco <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> From: Bruno Busco <[hidden email]>
>> Subject: Login Management
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 10:27 AM
>> Hi,
>> I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP application.
>> So I am going to use the framework alone and then build the
>> custom
>> applications.
>>
>> My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and relative
>> groups, permissions
>> and roles.
>>
>> From what I can see the UserLogin entity is defined by the
>> framework itself,
>> so I imagine it will work without the Party component.
>> But I also see that the
>> https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is
>> implemented in
>> the Party component.
>> Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to implement such
>> basic Login entity
>> management screen?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Bruno
>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Login Management

David E Jones
In reply to this post by Adrian Crum-2

I agree, but I'm not sure that webtools is the place. The common  
component is a much better place.

-David


On Jun 21, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:

> It would be nice to have all of the security related UI in the  
> Webtools component, then have the Party component share those  
> artifacts. So, the Party Security UI wouldn't change, but its  
> security-related screens and forms and such would be kept in Webtools.
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> --- On Thu, 6/19/08, Bruno Busco <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> From: Bruno Busco <[hidden email]>
>> Subject: Login Management
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 10:27 AM
>> Hi,
>> I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP application.
>> So I am going to use the framework alone and then build the
>> custom
>> applications.
>>
>> My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and relative
>> groups, permissions
>> and roles.
>>
>> From what I can see the UserLogin entity is defined by the
>> framework itself,
>> so I imagine it will work without the Party component.
>> But I also see that the
>> https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is
>> implemented in
>> the Party component.
>> Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to implement such
>> basic Login entity
>> management screen?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Bruno
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Login Management

Adrian Crum-2
That's a great idea - thanks!


--- On Sat, 6/21/08, David E Jones <[hidden email]> wrote:

> From: David E Jones <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: Login Management
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Saturday, June 21, 2008, 5:21 PM
> I agree, but I'm not sure that webtools is the place.
> The common  
> component is a much better place.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Jun 21, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
> > It would be nice to have all of the security related
> UI in the  
> > Webtools component, then have the Party component
> share those  
> > artifacts. So, the Party Security UI wouldn't
> change, but its  
> > security-related screens and forms and such would be
> kept in Webtools.
> >
> > -Adrian
> >
> >
> > --- On Thu, 6/19/08, Bruno Busco
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Bruno Busco <[hidden email]>
> >> Subject: Login Management
> >> To: [hidden email]
> >> Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 10:27 AM
> >> Hi,
> >> I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP
> application.
> >> So I am going to use the framework alone and then
> build the
> >> custom
> >> applications.
> >>
> >> My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and
> relative
> >> groups, permissions
> >> and roles.
> >>
> >> From what I can see the UserLogin entity is
> defined by the
> >> framework itself,
> >> so I imagine it will work without the Party
> component.
> >> But I also see that the
> >>
> https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is
> >> implemented in
> >> the Party component.
> >> Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to
> implement such
> >> basic Login entity
> >> management screen?
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Bruno
> >
> >
> >