Portlet specification

[Foo Shyn Chung]

Hi all,

Just want to check, does anyone knows that whether the portlet in Ofbiz is
actually in compliance with JSR168 and/or JSR 286?

Thanx
FooShyn

[Erwan de FERRIERES-2]

2012/5/23 Foo Shyn Chung <[hidden email]>:
> Hi all,
>
> Just want to check, does anyone knows that whether the portlet in Ofbiz is
> actually in compliance with JSR168 and/or JSR 286?

As far as I know, none of them.
Back in 2009, here is what was said:
mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ofbiz-user/200906.mbox/<[hidden email]>
>
> Thanx
> FooShyn



--
Erwan de FERRIERES

[Ruth Hoffman-2]

Hi FooShyn:

There is no relationship between the OFBiz portlet and either of these
specifications. (Or any Java Portlet specification.) Hence my suggestion
(at the time) that this functionality not be named "portlet".

Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
Adaptive Enterprise Solutions, LLC.
http://www.myofbiz.com


On 5/23/12 6:21 AM, Foo Shyn Chung wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just want to check, does anyone knows that whether the portlet in Ofbiz is
> actually in compliance with JSR168 and/or JSR 286?
>
> Thanx
> FooShyn
>

[Foo Shyn Chung]

I see, thanks for the answer.

Thanx
FooShyn

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Ruth Hoffman <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi FooShyn:
>
> There is no relationship between the OFBiz portlet and either of these
> specifications. (Or any Java Portlet specification.) Hence my suggestion
> (at the time) that this functionality not be named "portlet".
>
> Best Regards,
> Ruth Hoffman
> Adaptive Enterprise Solutions, LLC.
> http://www.myofbiz.com
>
>
>
> On 5/23/12 6:21 AM, Foo Shyn Chung wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just want to check, does anyone knows that whether the portlet in Ofbiz is
>> actually in compliance with JSR168 and/or JSR 286?
>>
>> Thanx
>> FooShyn
>>
>>