Product Configuration - PC001

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Product Configuration - PC001

james-2
Banned User
This post was updated on .
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Product Configuration - PC001

Pierre Smits-3
Hi James,

The mindset behind it is that a configurable product will lead to a
specific identifiable new end product (think legal requirement), that can
be followed through its life-cycle (maintenance, support, etc.).

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President*
*Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
*Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer


On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:42 AM <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I have been playing around with adding PC001(Configured Item) to a sales
> order which gets configured.  I noticed that it creates a new product ID
> every time you create a configured order.  Is this correct?  Wouldn't
> this fill up the Catalog with hundreds of obsolete product IDs?
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Product Configuration - PC001

Julien NICOLAS
I agree with Pierre. It's important for traceability.

In other hand, if you create exactly the same configuration, I remember
that it doesn't create a new product. Could you confirm ?

Regards,

Julien.

Le 06/12/2018 à 09:08, Pierre Smits a écrit :

> Hi James,
>
> The mindset behind it is that a configurable product will lead to a
> specific identifiable new end product (think legal requirement), that can
> be followed through its life-cycle (maintenance, support, etc.).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President*
> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
> since 2008*
> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:42 AM <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> I have been playing around with adding PC001(Configured Item) to a sales
>> order which gets configured.  I noticed that it creates a new product ID
>> every time you create a configured order.  Is this correct?  Wouldn't
>> this fill up the Catalog with hundreds of obsolete product IDs?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> James
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Product Configuration - PC001

Shi Jinghai-3
In reply to this post by james-2
Yes, Pierre is right, it's a great sample for many use cases, such as each citizen card has a unique RFID number, each mobile phone has one or two IMEI, each marriage ring has its own words, each wall painting ...


-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Pierre Smits [mailto:[hidden email]]
发送时间: 2018年12月6日 16:09
收件人: [hidden email]
主题: Re: Product Configuration - PC001

Hi James,

The mindset behind it is that a configurable product will lead to a
specific identifiable new end product (think legal requirement), that can
be followed through its life-cycle (maintenance, support, etc.).

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President*
*Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
*Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer


On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:42 AM <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I have been playing around with adding PC001(Configured Item) to a sales
> order which gets configured.  I noticed that it creates a new product ID
> every time you create a configured order.  Is this correct?  Wouldn't
> this fill up the Catalog with hundreds of obsolete product IDs?
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>