Re: FOP Issues [Solved]
Locked
Re: FOP Issues [Solved]
 
|
Re: FOP Issues [Solved]
|
|
Re: FOP Issues [Solved]
|
|
You can also change settings for specific class packages so that the logging level is not as verbose just for the fop classes. There are some examples of this in the current log4j config file. If it's not obvious after looking for a few minutes please reply and I'll throw together an example or something. -David On Dec 10, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > You're right - thanks Chris! > > Let me see if there's a way to point FOP to a different config file > so we don't have to change the project's config file. > > -Adrian > > Chris Howe wrote: >> It's choking on the log4j. If you change the root logger in >> framework/base/config/log4j.xml from ALL to INFO, back to normal. >> ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Adrian Crum <[hidden email]> >> To: [hidden email] >> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 11:39:37 AM >> Subject: Re: FOP Issues >> So much has changed between trunk and R4 that it would be a very time >> consuming task to go through a list of changed files to see which >> one caused the problem. That's why I >> suggested a profiler - it would spot the culprit right away. >> Chris Howe wrote: >>> It helps if one (me) reads before applying a solution. I had >>> applied >> Christian's patch to trunk and came up empty. I just did a c/o of >> 4.0 >> and viola...works OOTB. Adrian, I share your sentiments on the >> issue. >> That was the most draining exercise I've gone through with OFbiz >> in I >> don't know how long. Are there really that many files where the >> culprit could be? >>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Adrian Crum <[hidden email]> >>> To: [hidden email] >>> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:44:23 AM >>> Subject: Re: FOP Issues >>> >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1401 >>> >>> Chris Howe wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I am having some trouble with FOP. It appears that performance >>> >>> suffers >>> >>> >>>> exponentially for each additional page that is written in the body >>>> (overflowing to the next page). Two pages takes about a minute to >>> >>> render. >>> >>> >>>> Five pages takes about 10 minutes. Ten pages takes about a half >>>> hour. Plenty of memory available in the JVM, plenty of CPU >>> >>> available as >>> >>> >>>> well. It completes the screen renderer quickly and gets stuck in >>> >>> the FOP >>> >>> >>>> portion. Any hints or OOTB templates that would mimic the page >>>> overflow that I can test to see if it's choking on my template or >>>> if >>> >>> it's >>> >>> >>>> just choking period? I've tried it with both .93 and .94. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > |
smime.p7s (3K)
Re: FOP Issues [Solved]
|
|
Re: FOP Issues [Solved]
|
|
Re: FOP Issues [Solved]
|
|
Re: FOP Issues [Solved]
|
|
Christian Geisert is probably listening in on this list, and he is involved in that part of the ASF (as well as a committer on OFBiz now). He might have some ideas about how to handle this better in FOP, but it may just be that FOP does a LOT of logging if certain levels are turned on, and they may not want to reduce or eliminate that. If it does expose a problem with it, then hopefully it will help them improve FOP! -David On Dec 10, 2007, at 6:16 PM, Chris Howe wrote: > How is it that we're able to handle the "ALL" fail safe priority? > Perhaps we can shoot something over to Apache FOP so they can handle > it as well. > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: David E Jones <[hidden email]> > To: [hidden email] > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 6:37:53 PM > Subject: Re: FOP Issues [Solved] > > > > You can also change settings for specific class packages so that the > logging level is not as verbose just for the fop classes. > > There are some examples of this in the current log4j config file. If > it's not obvious after looking for a few minutes please reply and I'll > > throw together an example or something. > > -David > > > On Dec 10, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > >> You're right - thanks Chris! >> >> Let me see if there's a way to point FOP to a different config file >> so we don't have to change the project's config file. >> >> -Adrian >> >> Chris Howe wrote: >>> It's choking on the log4j. If you change the root logger in >>> framework/base/config/log4j.xml from ALL to INFO, back to normal. >>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Adrian Crum <[hidden email]> >>> To: [hidden email] >>> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 11:39:37 AM >>> Subject: Re: FOP Issues >>> So much has changed between trunk and R4 that it would be a very > time >>> consuming task to go through a list of changed files to see which >>> one caused the problem. That's why I >>> suggested a profiler - it would spot the culprit right away. >>> Chris Howe wrote: >>>> It helps if one (me) reads before applying a solution. I had >>>> applied >>> Christian's patch to trunk and came up empty. I just did a c/o of >>> 4.0 >>> and viola...works OOTB. Adrian, I share your sentiments on the >>> issue. >>> That was the most draining exercise I've gone through with OFbiz >>> in I >>> don't know how long. Are there really that many files where the >>> culprit could be? >>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>>> From: Adrian Crum <[hidden email]> >>>> To: [hidden email] >>>> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:44:23 AM >>>> Subject: Re: FOP Issues >>>> >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1401 >>>> >>>> Chris Howe wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I am having some trouble with FOP. It appears that performance >>>> >>>> suffers >>>> >>>> >>>>> exponentially for each additional page that is written in the body >>>>> (overflowing to the next page). Two pages takes about a minute to >>>> >>>> render. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Five pages takes about 10 minutes. Ten pages takes about a half >>>>> hour. Plenty of memory available in the JVM, plenty of CPU >>>> >>>> available as >>>> >>>> >>>>> well. It completes the screen renderer quickly and gets stuck in >>>> >>>> the FOP >>>> >>>> >>>>> portion. Any hints or OOTB templates that would mimic the page >>>>> overflow that I can test to see if it's choking on my template or > >>>>> if >>>> >>>> it's >>>> >>>> >>>>> just choking period? I've tried it with both .93 and .94. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> > > > > |
Re: FOP Issues [Solved]
|
|
Re: FOP Issues [Solved]
|
|
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |