Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/...

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
14 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/...

Ashish Vijaywargiya-5
Hello Marco,

Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
I truly appreciate your efforts.

Here are few thoughts / comments :

1) We are saving password as it is.
https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/ViewGatewayConfiguration?paymentGatewayConfigId=PAYFLOWPRO_CONFIG
I think we should encrypt the password before saving it to database and
will not show the password as it is while fetching it from database.
Thoughts ?

2) We should change the name of service in the service definition and
implementation.
For example you have used "updateGatewayConfiguration" instead of this
if we use "updatePaymentGatewayConfig" then it will help developers to
easily see the referenced entity.
Same applies to other references like
updateGatewayConfigurationPayflowPro,
updateGatewayConfigurationClearCommerce .... etc.

3) We should change request map entries to follow the best practice as
well.
For ex : ViewGatewayConfigurationType, ViewGatewayConfiguration can be
changed EditPaymentGatewayConfigType & EditPaymentGatewayConfig
respectively.

I am requesting you to change this now (Refer #3 & #4 points) because
newcomers start coding and can take reference of this code.

4) Do you have some some plan to provide the form and services to create
new "PaymentGatewayConfig" & "PaymentGatewayConfigType" records ?

--
Ashish Vijaywargiya



[hidden email] wrote:

> Author: mrisaliti
> Date: Thu Apr  9 19:45:31 2009
> New Revision: 763782
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763782&view=rev
> Log:
> Move payment.properties to PaymentGatewayConfig entities (OFBIZ-2269)
>
> Added:
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/PaymentGatewayConfigServices.xml   (with props)
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/servicedef/services_paymentgateway.xml   (with props)
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/PaymentGatewayConfigurationsForms.xml   (with props)
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/PaymentGatewayConfigurationsScreens.xml   (with props)
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/WEB-INF/actions/store/EditProductStorePaySetup.groovy   (with props)
> Modified:
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/data/AccountingTypeData.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/ofbiz-component.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/servicedef/services_paymentmethod.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/PaymentGatewayServices.java
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/controller.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/Menus.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/servicedef/services_store.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/store/ProductStoreForms.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/widget/catalog/StoreScreens.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoFinAccount.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoProduct.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoRentalProduct.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoStoreGiftCertificateSettings.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/pos/data/DemoRetail.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/webpos/data/DemoPosData.xml
>
> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml?rev=763782&r1=763781&r2=763782&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml (original)
> +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml Thu Apr  9 19:45:31 2009
> @@ -5474,6 +5474,30 @@
>          <value xml:lang="th">รายการสถานะกลุ่มผู้ใช้</value>
>          <value xml:lang="zh">会员角色列表</value>
>      </property>
> +    <property key="AccountingPayflowProLoggingOff">
> +        <value xml:lang="en">Logging Off</value>
> +        <value xml:lang="it">Log disabilitato</value>
> +    </property>
>
>  


smime.p7s (4K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/...

risalitim@gmail.com
Hi Ashish,

all those requests are really make sense to me but I didn't know when  
we can implement it.

I'm now changing PayflowPro integration to support new version 4  
because from September 2009 v2 & v3 will be no more function.

In the same moment I willl support new PaymentGatewayConfig for  
PayflowPro.

I have also made same changes to support Google Checkout integration  
with PaymentGatewayConfig but there are still a lot of gateways to be  
converted to the new configuration (ClearCommerce, Authorize dot net,  
CyberSource, PcCharge, RIta, ValueLink, WorldPay).

Thanks
Marco

Il giorno 14/apr/09, alle ore 10:11, Ashish Vijaywargiya ha scritto:

> Hello Marco,
>
> Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
> I truly appreciate your efforts.
>
> Here are few thoughts / comments :
>
> 1) We are saving password as it is.
> https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/ViewGatewayConfiguration?paymentGatewayConfigId=PAYFLOWPRO_CONFIG
> I think we should encrypt the password before saving it to database  
> and will not show the password as it is while fetching it from  
> database.
> Thoughts ?
>
> 2) We should change the name of service in the service definition  
> and implementation.
> For example you have used "updateGatewayConfiguration" instead of  
> this if we use "updatePaymentGatewayConfig" then it will help  
> developers to easily see the referenced entity.
> Same applies to other references like  
> updateGatewayConfigurationPayflowPro,  
> updateGatewayConfigurationClearCommerce .... etc.
>
> 3) We should change request map entries to follow the best practice  
> as well.
> For ex : ViewGatewayConfigurationType, ViewGatewayConfiguration can  
> be changed EditPaymentGatewayConfigType & EditPaymentGatewayConfig  
> respectively.
>
> I am requesting you to change this now (Refer #3 & #4 points)  
> because newcomers start coding and can take reference of this code.
>
> 4) Do you have some some plan to provide the form and services to  
> create new "PaymentGatewayConfig" & "PaymentGatewayConfigType"  
> records ?
>
> --
> Ashish Vijaywargiya
>
>
>
> [hidden email] wrote:
>> Author: mrisaliti
>> Date: Thu Apr  9 19:45:31 2009
>> New Revision: 763782
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763782&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Move payment.properties to PaymentGatewayConfig entities (OFBIZ-2269)
>>
>> Added:
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/
>> payment/PaymentGatewayConfigServices.xml   (with props)
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/servicedef/
>> services_paymentgateway.xml   (with props)
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/
>> PaymentGatewayConfigurationsForms.xml   (with props)
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/
>> PaymentGatewayConfigurationsScreens.xml   (with props)
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/WEB-INF/actions/
>> store/EditProductStorePaySetup.groovy   (with props)
>> Modified:
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/data/AccountingTypeData.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/ofbiz-component.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/servicedef/
>> services_paymentmethod.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/
>> payment/PaymentGatewayServices.java
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/
>> controller.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/Menus.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/servicedef/services_store.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/store/
>> ProductStoreForms.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/widget/catalog/StoreScreens.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoFinAccount.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoProduct.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoRentalProduct.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/
>> DemoStoreGiftCertificateSettings.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/pos/data/DemoRetail.xml
>>    ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/webpos/data/DemoPosData.xml
>>
>> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/
>> AccountingUiLabels.xml
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml?rev=763782&r1=763781&r2=763782&view=diff
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =====================================================================
>> --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/
>> AccountingUiLabels.xml (original)
>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/
>> AccountingUiLabels.xml Thu Apr  9 19:45:31 2009
>> @@ -5474,6 +5474,30 @@
>>         <value xml:lang="th">รายการสถานะกà¸
>> ¥à¸¸à¹ˆà¸¡à¸œà¸¹à¹‰à¹ƒà¸Šà¹‰</value>
>>         <value xml:lang="zh">会员角色列表</value>
>>     </property>
>> +    <property key="AccountingPayflowProLoggingOff">
>> +        <value xml:lang="en">Logging Off</value>
>> +        <value xml:lang="it">Log disabilitato</value>
>> +    </property>
>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by Ashish Vijaywargiya-5
From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]>
Hello Marco,

Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
I truly appreciate your efforts.

Here are few thoughts / comments :

1) We are saving password as it is.
https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/ViewGatewayConfiguration?paymentGatewayConfigId=PAYFLOWPRO_CONFIG
I think we should encrypt the password before saving it to database and
will not show the password as it is while fetching it from database.
Thoughts ?

+1, using what we already use (also SHA that should be salted at some point in the future)

2) We should change the name of service in the service definition and
implementation.
For example you have used "updateGatewayConfiguration" instead of this
if we use "updatePaymentGatewayConfig" then it will help developers to
easily see the referenced entity.
Same applies to other references like
updateGatewayConfigurationPayflowPro,
updateGatewayConfigurationClearCommerce .... etc.

3) We should change request map entries to follow the best practice as
well.
For ex : ViewGatewayConfigurationType, ViewGatewayConfiguration can be
changed EditPaymentGatewayConfigType & EditPaymentGatewayConfig
respectively.

I am requesting you to change this now (Refer #3 & #4 points) because
newcomers start coding and can take reference of this code.

+1

Jacques

4) Do you have some some plan to provide the form and services to create
new "PaymentGatewayConfig" & "PaymentGatewayConfigType" records ?

--
Ashish Vijaywargiya



[hidden email] wrote:

> Author: mrisaliti
> Date: Thu Apr  9 19:45:31 2009
> New Revision: 763782
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763782&view=rev
> Log:
> Move payment.properties to PaymentGatewayConfig entities (OFBIZ-2269)
>
> Added:
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/PaymentGatewayConfigServices.xml   (with props)
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/servicedef/services_paymentgateway.xml   (with props)
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/PaymentGatewayConfigurationsForms.xml   (with props)
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/PaymentGatewayConfigurationsScreens.xml   (with props)
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/WEB-INF/actions/store/EditProductStorePaySetup.groovy   (with props)
> Modified:
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/data/AccountingTypeData.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/ofbiz-component.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/servicedef/services_paymentmethod.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/PaymentGatewayServices.java
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/controller.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/Menus.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/servicedef/services_store.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/store/ProductStoreForms.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/widget/catalog/StoreScreens.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoFinAccount.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoProduct.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoRentalProduct.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoStoreGiftCertificateSettings.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/pos/data/DemoRetail.xml
>     ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/webpos/data/DemoPosData.xml
>
> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml?rev=763782&r1=763781&r2=763782&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml (original)
> +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml Thu Apr  9 19:45:31 2009
> @@ -5474,6 +5474,30 @@
>          <value xml:lang="th">à ¸£à ¸²à ¸¢à ¸à ¸²à ¸£à ¸ªà ¸Â-à ¸²à ¸ÂTà ¸°à ¸à ¸¥à ¸¸à ¹Â^à ¸¡Ã
> ¸Âoà ¸¹à ¹Â?à ¹Âfà ¸ÂSà ¹Â?</value>
>          <value xml:lang="zh">ä¼ÂsÃ¥Â'Â~è§Â'èÂ?²åÂ^Â-表</value>
>      </property>
> +    <property key="AccountingPayflowProLoggingOff">
> +        <value xml:lang="en">Logging Off</value>
> +        <value xml:lang="it">Log disabilitato</value>
> +    </property>
>
>



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by risalitim@gmail.com
Yes advices are always easier than coding (at least when they are goods it helps ;o)

Jacques

From: <[hidden email]>

> Hi Ashish,
>
> all those requests are really make sense to me but I didn't know when  we can implement it.
>
> I'm now changing PayflowPro integration to support new version 4  because from September 2009 v2 & v3 will be no more function.
>
> In the same moment I willl support new PaymentGatewayConfig for  PayflowPro.
>
> I have also made same changes to support Google Checkout integration  with PaymentGatewayConfig but there are still a lot of
> gateways to be  converted to the new configuration (ClearCommerce, Authorize dot net,  CyberSource, PcCharge, RIta, ValueLink,
> WorldPay).
>
> Thanks
> Marco
>
> Il giorno 14/apr/09, alle ore 10:11, Ashish Vijaywargiya ha scritto:
>
>> Hello Marco,
>>
>> Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
>> I truly appreciate your efforts.
>>
>> Here are few thoughts / comments :
>>
>> 1) We are saving password as it is.
>> https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/ViewGatewayConfiguration?paymentGatewayConfigId=PAYFLOWPRO_CONFIG
>> I think we should encrypt the password before saving it to database  and will not show the password as it is while fetching it
>> from  database.
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> 2) We should change the name of service in the service definition  and implementation.
>> For example you have used "updateGatewayConfiguration" instead of  this if we use "updatePaymentGatewayConfig" then it will help
>> developers to easily see the referenced entity.
>> Same applies to other references like  updateGatewayConfigurationPayflowPro,  updateGatewayConfigurationClearCommerce .... etc.
>>
>> 3) We should change request map entries to follow the best practice  as well.
>> For ex : ViewGatewayConfigurationType, ViewGatewayConfiguration can  be changed EditPaymentGatewayConfigType &
>> EditPaymentGatewayConfig  respectively.
>>
>> I am requesting you to change this now (Refer #3 & #4 points)  because newcomers start coding and can take reference of this
>> code.
>>
>> 4) Do you have some some plan to provide the form and services to  create new "PaymentGatewayConfig" & "PaymentGatewayConfigType"
>> records ?
>>
>> --
>> Ashish Vijaywargiya
>>
>>
>>
>> [hidden email] wrote:
>>> Author: mrisaliti
>>> Date: Thu Apr  9 19:45:31 2009
>>> New Revision: 763782
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763782&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Move payment.properties to PaymentGatewayConfig entities (OFBIZ-2269)
>>>
>>> Added:
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/ payment/PaymentGatewayConfigServices.xml   (with props)
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/servicedef/ services_paymentgateway.xml   (with props)
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/ PaymentGatewayConfigurationsForms.xml   (with props)
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/ PaymentGatewayConfigurationsScreens.xml   (with props)
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/WEB-INF/actions/ store/EditProductStorePaySetup.groovy   (with props)
>>> Modified:
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/data/AccountingTypeData.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/ofbiz-component.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/servicedef/ services_paymentmethod.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/ payment/PaymentGatewayServices.java
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/ controller.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/Menus.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/servicedef/services_store.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/store/ ProductStoreForms.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/widget/catalog/StoreScreens.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoFinAccount.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoProduct.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/DemoRentalProduct.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ecommerce/data/ DemoStoreGiftCertificateSettings.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/pos/data/DemoRetail.xml
>>>    ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/webpos/data/DemoPosData.xml
>>>
>>> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/ AccountingUiLabels.xml
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml?rev=763782&r1=763781&r2=763782&view=diff
>>> = = = = = = = = = =====================================================================
>>> --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/ AccountingUiLabels.xml (original)
>>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/ AccountingUiLabels.xml Thu Apr  9 19:45:31 2009
>>> @@ -5474,6 +5474,30 @@
>>>         <value xml:lang="th">รายการสà¸-าà¸Tะกภ¥à¸¸à¹^มà¸oูà¹?à¹fà¸Sà¹?</value>
>>>         <value xml:lang="zh">ä¼så'~è§'è?²å^-表</value>
>>>     </property>
>>> +    <property key="AccountingPayflowProLoggingOff">
>>> +        <value xml:lang="en">Logging Off</value>
>>> +        <value xml:lang="it">Log disabilitato</value>
>>> +    </property>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/

David E Jones-3
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux

On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]>
> Hello Marco,
>
> Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
> I truly appreciate your efforts.
>
> Here are few thoughts / comments :
>
> 1) We are saving password as it is.
> https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/ViewGatewayConfiguration?paymentGatewayConfigId=PAYFLOWPRO_CONFIG
> I think we should encrypt the password before saving it to database  
> and
> will not show the password as it is while fetching it from database.
> Thoughts ?
>
> +1, using what we already use (also SHA that should be salted at  
> some point in the future)

These are all good changes, so thanks to Jacques and especially Ashish  
for the comments.

For the gateway password encryption we'll want to use the Entity  
Engine's built-in two-way encryption. We can't use SHA/hash encryption  
because we have to be able to decrypt these passwords to send them to  
the payment gateway (ie they would never accept a hashed form of the  
password, that is a big security hole and basically nullifies most of  
the benefit of the hash, which is why by default we don't allow that  
in OFBiz either).

-David

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>

> On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]>
>> Hello Marco,
>>
>> Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
>> I truly appreciate your efforts.
>>
>> Here are few thoughts / comments :
>>
>> 1) We are saving password as it is.
>> https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/ViewGatewayConfiguration?paymentGatewayConfigId=PAYFLOWPRO_CONFIG
>> I think we should encrypt the password before saving it to database  and
>> will not show the password as it is while fetching it from database.
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> +1, using what we already use (also SHA that should be salted at  some point in the future)
>
> These are all good changes, so thanks to Jacques and especially Ashish  for the comments.
>
> For the gateway password encryption we'll want to use the Entity  Engine's built-in two-way encryption. We can't use SHA/hash
> encryption  because we have to be able to decrypt these passwords to send them to  the payment gateway (ie they would never accept
> a hashed form of the  password, that is a big security hole and basically nullifies most of  the benefit of the hash, which is why
> by default we don't allow that  in OFBiz either).
>
> -David

Hi David,

I understand that we need a 2 ways encryption for a payment gateway.
But about SHA I'm not quite sure to understand. SHA means Secure Hash Algorithm, so why do you add /ash after SHA ?
I know we use SHA for login password, so I'm no sure of what you mean. Do you mean that we should not use salted SHA  in OFBiz at
all ?

Jacques



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/

David E Jones-3

On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>
>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]>
>>> Hello Marco,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
>>> I truly appreciate your efforts.
>>>
>>> Here are few thoughts / comments :
>>>
>>> 1) We are saving password as it is.
>>> https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/ViewGatewayConfiguration?paymentGatewayConfigId=PAYFLOWPRO_CONFIG
>>> I think we should encrypt the password before saving it to  
>>> database  and
>>> will not show the password as it is while fetching it from database.
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>> +1, using what we already use (also SHA that should be salted at  
>>> some point in the future)
>>
>> These are all good changes, so thanks to Jacques and especially  
>> Ashish  for the comments.
>>
>> For the gateway password encryption we'll want to use the Entity  
>> Engine's built-in two-way encryption. We can't use SHA/hash  
>> encryption  because we have to be able to decrypt these passwords  
>> to send them to  the payment gateway (ie they would never accept a  
>> hashed form of the  password, that is a big security hole and  
>> basically nullifies most of  the benefit of the hash, which is why  
>> by default we don't allow that  in OFBiz either).
>>
>> -David
>
> Hi David,
>
> I understand that we need a 2 ways encryption for a payment gateway.
> But about SHA I'm not quite sure to understand. SHA means Secure  
> Hash Algorithm, so why do you add /ash after SHA ?
> I know we use SHA for login password, so I'm no sure of what you  
> mean. Do you mean that we should not use salted SHA  in OFBiz at all ?

SHA is a hash algorithm, but there are other hash algorithms and that  
is why I wrote "SHA/hash".

My main point is that a normal password hash algorithm is not relevant  
here as it can't be used when 2-way encryption is needed, that's all.

-David

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Thanks for the clarification David

Jacques

From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>

> On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>
>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]>
>>>> Hello Marco,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
>>>> I truly appreciate your efforts.
>>>>
>>>> Here are few thoughts / comments :
>>>>
>>>> 1) We are saving password as it is.
>>>> https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/ViewGatewayConfiguration?paymentGatewayConfigId=PAYFLOWPRO_CONFIG
>>>> I think we should encrypt the password before saving it to  
>>>> database  and
>>>> will not show the password as it is while fetching it from database.
>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>> +1, using what we already use (also SHA that should be salted at  
>>>> some point in the future)
>>>
>>> These are all good changes, so thanks to Jacques and especially  
>>> Ashish  for the comments.
>>>
>>> For the gateway password encryption we'll want to use the Entity  
>>> Engine's built-in two-way encryption. We can't use SHA/hash  
>>> encryption  because we have to be able to decrypt these passwords  
>>> to send them to  the payment gateway (ie they would never accept a  
>>> hashed form of the  password, that is a big security hole and  
>>> basically nullifies most of  the benefit of the hash, which is why  
>>> by default we don't allow that  in OFBiz either).
>>>
>>> -David
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I understand that we need a 2 ways encryption for a payment gateway.
>> But about SHA I'm not quite sure to understand. SHA means Secure  
>> Hash Algorithm, so why do you add /ash after SHA ?
>> I know we use SHA for login password, so I'm no sure of what you  
>> mean. Do you mean that we should not use salted SHA  in OFBiz at all ?
>
> SHA is a hash algorithm, but there are other hash algorithms and that  
> is why I wrote "SHA/hash".
>
> My main point is that a normal password hash algorithm is not relevant  
> here as it can't be used when 2-way encryption is needed, that's all.
>
> -David
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/

Ashish Vijaywargiya-5
Thanks Jacques & David.

--
Ashish

Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Thanks for the clarification David
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>
>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>
>>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Hello Marco,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
>>>>> I truly appreciate your efforts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are few thoughts / comments :
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) We are saving password as it is.
>>>>> https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/ViewGatewayConfiguration?paymentGatewayConfigId=PAYFLOWPRO_CONFIG 
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we should encrypt the password before saving it to  
>>>>> database  and
>>>>> will not show the password as it is while fetching it from database.
>>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>>
>>>>> +1, using what we already use (also SHA that should be salted at  
>>>>> some point in the future)
>>>>
>>>> These are all good changes, so thanks to Jacques and especially  
>>>> Ashish  for the comments.
>>>>
>>>> For the gateway password encryption we'll want to use the Entity  
>>>> Engine's built-in two-way encryption. We can't use SHA/hash  
>>>> encryption  because we have to be able to decrypt these passwords  
>>>> to send them to  the payment gateway (ie they would never accept a  
>>>> hashed form of the  password, that is a big security hole and  
>>>> basically nullifies most of  the benefit of the hash, which is why  
>>>> by default we don't allow that  in OFBiz either).
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> I understand that we need a 2 ways encryption for a payment gateway.
>>> But about SHA I'm not quite sure to understand. SHA means Secure  
>>> Hash Algorithm, so why do you add /ash after SHA ?
>>> I know we use SHA for login password, so I'm no sure of what you  
>>> mean. Do you mean that we should not use salted SHA  in OFBiz at all ?
>>
>> SHA is a hash algorithm, but there are other hash algorithms and
>> that  is why I wrote "SHA/hash".
>>
>> My main point is that a normal password hash algorithm is not
>> relevant  here as it can't be used when 2-way encryption is needed,
>> that's all.
>>
>> -David
>>
>

smime.p7s (4K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Actualluy we should better thank Marco! ;o)

Jacques

From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]>

> Thanks Jacques & David.
>
> --
> Ashish
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Thanks for the clarification David
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>
>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>
>>>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>> Hello Marco,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
>>>>>> I truly appreciate your efforts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are few thoughts / comments :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) We are saving password as it is.
>>>>>> https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/ViewGatewayConfiguration?paymentGatewayConfigId=PAYFLOWPRO_CONFIG 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we should encrypt the password before saving it to  
>>>>>> database  and
>>>>>> will not show the password as it is while fetching it from database.
>>>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1, using what we already use (also SHA that should be salted at  
>>>>>> some point in the future)
>>>>>
>>>>> These are all good changes, so thanks to Jacques and especially  
>>>>> Ashish  for the comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the gateway password encryption we'll want to use the Entity  
>>>>> Engine's built-in two-way encryption. We can't use SHA/hash  
>>>>> encryption  because we have to be able to decrypt these passwords  
>>>>> to send them to  the payment gateway (ie they would never accept a  
>>>>> hashed form of the  password, that is a big security hole and  
>>>>> basically nullifies most of  the benefit of the hash, which is why  
>>>>> by default we don't allow that  in OFBiz either).
>>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>> Hi David,
>>>>
>>>> I understand that we need a 2 ways encryption for a payment gateway.
>>>> But about SHA I'm not quite sure to understand. SHA means Secure  
>>>> Hash Algorithm, so why do you add /ash after SHA ?
>>>> I know we use SHA for login password, so I'm no sure of what you  
>>>> mean. Do you mean that we should not use salted SHA  in OFBiz at all ?
>>>
>>> SHA is a hash algorithm, but there are other hash algorithms and
>>> that  is why I wrote "SHA/hash".
>>>
>>> My main point is that a normal password hash algorithm is not
>>> relevant  here as it can't be used when 2-way encryption is needed,
>>> that's all.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/

mrisaliti@libero.it
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
Hi to all,

if I understand correctly it's enough to use the encrypt attribute on the password fields.

for example in PaymentGatewayPayfloPro could be :

<field name="pwd" type="short-varchar" encrypt="true">

Have I understood correctly ?

Thanks
Marco


>
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
> > From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>
> >> On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]>
> >>> Hello Marco,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
> >>> I truly appreciate your efforts.
> >>>
> >>> Here are few thoughts / comments :
> >>>
> >>> 1) We are saving password as it is.
> >>> https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/ViewGatewayConfiguration?paymentGatewayConfigId=PAYFLOWPRO_CONFIG
> >>> I think we should encrypt the password before saving it to
> >>> database  and
> >>> will not show the password as it is while fetching it from database.
> >>> Thoughts ?
> >>>
> >>> +1, using what we already use (also SHA that should be salted at  
> >>> some point in the future)
> >>
> >> These are all good changes, so thanks to Jacques and especially
> >> Ashish  for the comments.
> >>
> >> For the gateway password encryption we'll want to use the Entity
> >> Engine's built-in two-way encryption. We can't use SHA/hash
> >> encryption  because we have to be able to decrypt these passwords
> >> to send them to  the payment gateway (ie they would never accept a  
> >> hashed form of the  password, that is a big security hole and
> >> basically nullifies most of  the benefit of the hash, which is why  
> >> by default we don't allow that  in OFBiz either).
> >>
> >> -David
> >
> > Hi David,
> >
> > I understand that we need a 2 ways encryption for a payment gateway.
> > But about SHA I'm not quite sure to understand. SHA means Secure
> > Hash Algorithm, so why do you add /ash after SHA ?
> > I know we use SHA for login password, so I'm no sure of what you
> > mean. Do you mean that we should not use salted SHA  in OFBiz at all ?
>
> SHA is a hash algorithm, but there are other hash algorithms and that  
> is why I wrote "SHA/hash".
>
> My main point is that a normal password hash algorithm is not relevant
> here as it can't be used when 2-way encryption is needed, that's all.
>
> -David
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/

Ashish Vijaywargiya-5
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
 >> Hello Marco,

 >> Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
 >> I truly appreciate your efforts.

In my initial email I have given thanks to Marco ... and he deserve for
that.
I think you have missed that  .... may be due to your super fast working
style ;0).

I had given thanks to you and David because you guys have shared your
thoughts on my comment.

Thanks once again Marco, Jacques & David ! (I guess now the order of
included person in this line solves our purpose :-) )

--
Ashish

Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Actualluy we should better thank Marco! ;o)
>
> Jacques
>
>

smime.p7s (4K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/

Ashish Vijaywargiya-5
In reply to this post by mrisaliti@libero.it
AFAIK you understood it right Marco.
Here is the example for credit card :

      <field name="cardNumber" type="long-varchar" encrypt="true"></field>

--
Ashish


[hidden email] wrote:

> Hi to all,
>
> if I understand correctly it's enough to use the encrypt attribute on the password fields.
>
> for example in PaymentGatewayPayfloPro could be :
>
> <field name="pwd" type="short-varchar" encrypt="true">
>
> Have I understood correctly ?
>
> Thanks
> Marco
>
>
>  

smime.p7s (4K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r763782 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/entitydef/ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/ applications/accounting/

mrisaliti@libero.it
I have implemented most of requested improvements on Payment Gateway  
Config into issue OFBIZ-2297.
Could you please take a look at it ?

Thanks
Marco

Il giorno 15/apr/09, alle ore 14:18, Ashish Vijaywargiya ha scritto:

> AFAIK you understood it right Marco.
> Here is the example for credit card :
>
>     <field name="cardNumber" type="long-varchar" encrypt="true"></
> field>
>
> --
> Ashish
>
>
> [hidden email] wrote:
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> if I understand correctly it's enough to use the encrypt attribute  
>> on the password fields.
>>
>> for example in PaymentGatewayPayfloPro could be :
>>
>> <field name="pwd" type="short-varchar" encrypt="true">
>>
>> Have I understood correctly ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Marco
>>
>>
>>