Should we release a bug fix release for 09.04?

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

Should we vote and release a bug fix release for the 09.04 series? This will be Apache OFBiz 10.04.01 (right?) and will supersede Apache OFBiz 09.04.
I am not personally interested in this, and of course there is no hurry for a new release, but I know that some committers spent a lot of time backporting fixes to that branch, and if we think it is a good time for a bug fix release I would be happy to start another release process.

Kind regards,

Jacopo

[Adrian Crum]

On 1/19/2011 8:38 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Should we vote and release a bug fix release for the 09.04 series? This will be Apache OFBiz 10.04.01 (right?) and will supersede Apache OFBiz 09.04.
> I am not personally interested in this, and of course there is no hurry for a new release, but I know that some committers spent a lot of time backporting fixes to that branch, and if we think it is a good time for a bug fix release I would be happy to start another release process.

We might as well get it done now, and get the release updates out of the
way. Then we can clear our desks to make room for other things... ;-)

-Adrian

[Jacques Le Roux]

Adrian Crum wrote:

> On 1/19/2011 8:38 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> Should we vote and release a bug fix release for the 09.04 series? This will be Apache OFBiz 10.04.01 (right?) and will
>> supersede Apache OFBiz 09.04.
>> I am not personally interested in this, and of course there is no hurry for a new release, but I know that some committers spent
>> a lot of time backporting fixes to that branch, and if we think it is a good time for a bug fix release I would be happy to
>> start another release process.  
>
> We might as well get it done now, and get the release updates out of the
> way. Then we can clear our desks to make room for other things... ;-)
>
> -Adrian

Yes, why not?

Jacques

[BJ Freeman]

there is a distinct difference between 10.04 and 9.04
so a bug fix release would be 9.04.01

=========================
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com  <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man


Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 1/19/2011 8:38 AM:
> Should we vote and release a bug fix release for the 09.04 series? This will be Apache OFBiz 10.04.01 (right?) and will supersede Apache OFBiz 09.04.
> I am not personally interested in this, and of course there is no hurry for a new release, but I know that some committers spent a lot of time backporting fixes to that branch, and if we think it is a good time for a bug fix release I would be happy to start another release process.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
>

[Bruno Busco]

Of course I guess Jacopo intended 09.04.01 actually.

-Bruno


2011/1/19 BJ Freeman <[hidden email]>

> there is a distinct difference between 10.04 and 9.04
> so a bug fix release would be 9.04.01
>
> =========================
> BJ Freeman
> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  <
> http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
> Specialtymarket.com  <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>
> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>
>
> Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 1/19/2011 8:38 AM:
>
>  Should we vote and release a bug fix release for the 09.04 series? This
>> will be Apache OFBiz 10.04.01 (right?) and will supersede Apache OFBiz
>> 09.04.
>> I am not personally interested in this, and of course there is no hurry
>> for a new release, but I know that some committers spent a lot of time
>> backporting fixes to that branch, and if we think it is a good time for a
>> bug fix release I would be happy to start another release process.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>>
>>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Yes, this made me wonder also, why 10.04.01?

Jacques

From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>

> there is a distinct difference between 10.04 and 9.04
> so a bug fix release would be 9.04.01
>
> =========================
> BJ Freeman
> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
> Specialtymarket.com  <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>
> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>
>
> Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 1/19/2011 8:38 AM:
>> Should we vote and release a bug fix release for the 09.04 series? This will be Apache OFBiz 10.04.01 (right?) and will supersede
>> Apache OFBiz 09.04.
>> I am not personally interested in this, and of course there is no hurry for a new release, but I know that some committers spent
>> a lot of time backporting fixes to that branch, and if we think it is a good time for a bug fix release I would be happy to start
>> another release process.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>>
>

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

Yeah,

sorry for the confusion.... of course I meant "Apache OFBiz 09.04.01"!

Jacopo

On Jan 19, 2011, at 8:42 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Yes, this made me wonder also, why 10.04.01?
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>
>> there is a distinct difference between 10.04 and 9.04
>> so a bug fix release would be 9.04.01
>>
>> =========================
>> BJ Freeman
>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
>> Specialtymarket.com  <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>>
>> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>>
>>
>> Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 1/19/2011 8:38 AM:
>>> Should we vote and release a bug fix release for the 09.04 series? This will be Apache OFBiz 10.04.01 (right?) and will supersede Apache OFBiz 09.04.
>>> I am not personally interested in this, and of course there is no hurry for a new release, but I know that some committers spent a lot of time backporting fixes to that branch, and if we think it is a good time for a bug fix release I would be happy to start another release process.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>>
>
>